SEARCH
Current Location:
>
> This Story


Log in or Register to rate this News Story
Forward Printable StoryPrint Comment

Never Miss a Story

Sign up for email alerts

 

More Magazine Features

RTLS/RFID points to life-saving potential that may surprise From the Jan/Feb issue of HCB News magazine

Best of the Year 2015 The health care professionals honored in their respective fields

When do OEMs use special logistics and rigging companies, and when should you? From the December issue of HCB News magazine

How to make renting a crane an uplifting experience 10 tips on making light work of heavy lifting

Charity – Communities making a difference for local hospitals The Boston Marathon Jimmy Fund Walk and BRA Day Pittsburgh

See All Magazine Features  

More Voices

Accountable Care – How information mobility can help achieve meaningful results Insights from Ricoh Americas Corporation's Ron Nielson

$200 big data reward The Jacobus Report

Is there a future for the patient portal? Insights from Raj Amin, Mana Health co-founder and executive chairman

Q&A with Todd Ketch, CEO of the National Association for Proton Therapy Getting to know the new head of the NAPT

Q&A with Gernot Ringling, managing director of Messe Dusseldorf Asia Medical Fair Asia is growing rapidly, should you be attending this year's event?

IT Integration: Navigating challenges and finding the path forward As HIMSS approaches, we define - and explore - the obstacles facing health IT

My lunch with Jim Spearman The Jacobus Report

Discussing the state of the medical device market in Europe Q&A with Ed Sloan and Stephen Hodgson

Ultrasound at the point of care: who's in charge?

This first appeared in the June 2011 issue of DOTmed HealthCare Business News
This report originally appeared in the June 2011 issue of DOTmed Business News

By David Willis

One in three hospitalized patients may suffer medical errors or other adverse events, a rate ten times higher than previous estimates, according to a new study published in the April issue of Health Affairs. Another study in the same issue reported medical errors cost the US health care system $17.1 billion in 2008. Taken together, these findings offer powerful evidence that administrators and physicians need to work harder to improve the quality and safety of health care.

Ultrasound at the point of care may be part of the solution. Yet as the use of ultrasound becomes more integrated into medical specialties, it also becomes more of a flashpoint in the long-simmering turf war between radiologists and non-radiologists.

Story Continues Below Advertisement

Innovating Health & Wellness Within Your World

Industry Leading Warranty and Service. Clinical safety and Ergonomics. Patient Safety and Comfort. Schedule a meeting with one of our sales professionals at 717-235-6807 to establish Oakworks as your table contract supplier.



Turf wars
According to an August, 2010 special report in Emergency Medicine News, ”Radiologists and Emergency Physicians Still Debating Who Should Hold the Ultrasound Probe,” the new turf war is unlike the old. A driving force seems to be the evolving applications of the technology that have lead to misunderstandings on the part of some radiologists, leading them to perceive an encroachment on their traditional domain when there is actually an opportunity for radiologists and non-radiologists to work together in new ways to improve the quality and safety of health care. The report pointed out that better understanding of the benefits of emergency ultrasound, for example, would be “a win-win for the hospital system.”

So how do we achieve this solution? Let’s examine the facts about ultrasound at the point of care. Advances in ultrasound equipment have made it possible to use this powerful, safe technology around the world –and beyond--in settings as diverse as the International Space Station (where astronauts were trained, with expert medical guidance, to perform ultrasound examinations) to the Mount Everest base camp (where ultrasound has been used to diagnose high-altitude pulmonary edema) and battlefield medicine (where portable ultrasound devices can be employed to rapidly check wounded soldiers for internal bleeding and other potentially life-threatening conditions.)

Some radiologists have contended other physicians lack the necessary expertise to use ultrasound visualization, The May/June 2009 issue of Health Imaging & IT reported, “Some radiologists remain concerned about the efficacy of the growing use of ultrasound in the [emergency department],” due to the need for seasoned reading skills required to properly diagnose the patient and recommend a treatment plan. A similar disagreement erupted in 2010, in the online publication Medscape Radiology, with radiologists and emergency physicians debating whether non-radiologists should perform ultrasonography.

Continue reading Ultrasound at the point of care: who's in charge?...
  Pages: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 >>

Related:


Interested in Medical Industry News? Subscribe to DOTmed's weekly news email and always be informed. Click here, it takes just 30 seconds.

You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment

Advertise
Increase Your
Brand Awareness
Auctions + Private Sales
Get The
Best Price
Buy Equipment/Parts
Find The
Lowest Price
Daily News
Read The
Latest News
Directory
Browse All
DOTmed Users
Ethics on DOTmed
View Our
Ethics Program
Gold Parts Vendor Program
Receive PH
Requests
Gold Service Dealer Program
Receive RFP/PS
Requests
Healthcare Providers
See all
HCP Tools
Jobs/Training
Find/Fill
A Job
Parts Hunter +EasyPay
Get Parts
Quotes
Recently Certified
View Recently
Certified Users
Recently Rated
View Recently
Certified Users
Rental Central
Rent Equipment
For Less
Sell Equipment/Parts
Get The
Most Money
Service Technicians Forum
Find Help
And Advice
Simple RFP
Get Equipment
Quotes
Virtual Trade Show
Find Service
For Equipment
Access and use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions of our LEGAL NOTICE & PRIVACY NOTICE
Property of and Proprietary to DOTmed.com, Inc. Copyright ©2001-2016 DOTmed.com, Inc.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED