SEARCH
Current Location:
>
> This Story

starstarstarstarstar (1)
Log in or Register to rate this News Story
Forward Printable StoryPrint Comment

Never Miss a Story

Sign up for email alerts

 

More Industry Headlines

Federal government weighs in on antibiotic resistance Issues national strategy and calls for alternative treatments

A protein can speed up recovery after radiation and chemo Shows promise in animal experiments

Patient engagement solutions market expected to soar Will hit $13.7 billion by 2019

Big data platform designed for new value-based model Helps physicians improve outcomes while reducing costs

Hospitals saving billions on charity care ACA may save expansion state hospitals up to $4.2 billion in 2014

FDA approves GE's new PET/CT Higher sensitivity and field-of-view

Consensys joins forces with Oncology Services International A strategic alliance among ISOs

Checking in with the first installed MEVION S250 Assessing nine months of single room proton therapy

MEDICA 2014: IT Matters at MEDICA Health IT takes center stage at a number of presentations

Scripps' pencil-beam proton center had "exceptional results" Treated more tumor sites in seven months than others have

Researchers question pay-for-performance schemes

by Brendon Nafziger , DOTmed News Associate Editor
Rewarding doctors for doing good things and cutting out bad ones seems like a no-brainer, but researchers writing in the current issue of the British Medical Journal say pay-for-performance schemes might undermine physician motivation and are often based on flimsy evidence.

Pay-for-performance schemes, which tie financial incentives to meeting certain quality objectives, are becoming more popular, according to the authors. At least 170 initiatives have been started in the United States. Similar programs exist in the United Kingdom and Australia.

Story Continues Below Advertisement

Click to see a vision of improved quality of care in the OR

A mobile C-arm with low power can cause a unit to overheat, leaving your team waiting as valuable minutes tick by. Click to learn about the new Cios Alpha - delivering the most powerful generator available in a mobile C-arm



But in their paper, the researchers say that there's often little reliable evidence that most programs work over the long-term, save health systems money, or actually better patient outcomes.

"The evidence on whether financial incentives are more effective than other interventions is often weak and poorly reported," wrote the researchers, led by Paul P. Glasziou, a professor with the Center for Research in Evidence-Based Practice at Bond University in Queensland, Australia.

Gaming the system

A big worry is that instead of resulting in better patient outcomes, such programs merely encourage doctors to game the system. For instance, in programs that reward doctors for risk-adjusted mortality and morbidity results, doctors could engage in "upcoding," massaging the reimbursement codes to make patients seem sicker than they are to qualify for higher payments.

Outright data manipulation is another concern. A 2005 study cited by the researchers found that 16 percent of English emergency rooms studied directly tweaked their ER data to make it seem like they met a four-hour discharge target.

In an accompanying editorial, a trio of U.S. economists and public health experts warn that possibly the bigger problem with pay-for-performance schemes is that they rest on "flawed assumptions" of human motivation.

"Performance based pay may increase output for straightforward manual tasks," wrote Steffie Woolhandler, a professor at City University of New York, Dan Ariely a professor of psychology and behavioral economics at Duke University, and David U. Himmelstein, also a professor at City University. "However, a growing body of evidence from behavioral economics and social psychology indicates that rewards can undermine motivation and worsen performance on complex cognitive tasks, especially when motivation is high to begin with."

The checklist

Still, if policymakers are going to go ahead with pay-for-performance schemes, the Australian economists developed a nine-point checklist to help them avoid some of the pitfalls inherent in these programs.

Continue reading Researchers question pay-for-performance schemes...
  Pages: 1 - 2 >>

Related:


Interested in Medical Industry News? Subscribe to DOTmed's weekly news email and always be informed. Click here, it takes just 30 seconds.

You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment

Access and use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions of our LEGAL NOTICE & PRIVACY NOTICE
Property of and Proprietary to DOTmed.com, Inc. Copyright ©2001-2014 DOTmed.com, Inc.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED