SEARCH
Current Location:
>
> This Story


Log in or Register to rate this News Story
Forward Printable StoryPrint Comment

Never Miss a Story

Sign up for email alerts

 

More Industry Headlines

AFT calls for improved Ebola hospital protocols Meanwhile, 43 people in Texas are removed from Ebola watch list

Americans with insurance still not going to doctor Will making cost and quality information transparent be the solution?

Mass. health care cost transparency law underperforming Pricing still murky after transparency law introduced

FDA approves Siemens' ultrasound with true volume 3-D TEE probe The system offers real-time blood flow and valve measurements in seconds

Robotic MR-guided needle performs brain surgery through cheek No need to drill through patient's skull

MEDICA's education conference: where innovations merge The four-day conference will discuss relationships between science and medical technology

Barco launches new diagnostic display system The system may provide radiologists with some needed relief

Konica Minolta gets FDA clearance for AeroDR XE Portable radiography panel is specially designed for use under ER and ICU conditions

ESR calls for safer and more appropriate use of imaging Campaign intends to limit number of radiological exams performed

Hafner heads to Varian The former senior director of Global Sales and Marketing for Philips/Dunlee makes a move

Are CT exams a great risk for young adults?

by Loren Bonner , DOTmed News Online Editor
The benefits of CT scanning outweigh the risks of radiation exposure in sick young adults, according to a study published in the journal Radiology this month.

As the public becomes more concerned about radiation-induced cancers from CT scanning, researchers from Massachusetts General Hospital wanted to try to better understand the risks and benefits of CT scanning in young adults who are sick and need CT scanning as part of their medical treatment.

Story Continues Below Advertisement

Delivering on Dose Reduction Promises

Dr. Steven Mendelsohn of Zwanger-Pesiri Radiology, explains his commitment to dose reduction and why he believes a change in attitudes will be driven by patients rather than radiology professionals. Click to read more>>>



"My patients come to me with genuine concern [about radiation dose] and I wanted to look at the bigger picture to see past the scan and more to the fact that they have lymphoma or were hit by a car," Dr. Susanna Lee, chief of women's imaging at MGH, told DOTmed News.

Lee and her colleagues started out by looking at young adult patients who were scanned most frequently. These tended to be cancer patients, and the research team quickly realized that these patients were actually dying from their cancers before any of the concerns about the effects of long-term radiation could factor in.

Models predict that as humans age, cells become less sensitive to the mutagenic effects of radiation. In other words, the rate of radiation-induced cancer is higher in children and young adults. If they survive, they are more likely to live 10-20 years, which is the time it normally takes to develop a post-radiation malignancy.

For the study, Lee and her team decided to look at imaging records of every patient between 18 and 35 years old who had a chest or abdominopelvic CT scan at one of three university-affiliated hospitals in Boston between 2003-2007. Chest CT exams were most commonly ordered for cancer and trauma; and abdominal pain, trauma and cancer for abdominopelvic CT scans.

"What was surprising is that these patients are pretty sick. If you think about it the general risk of death in that age group after the five year follow-up period is like 1 percent, these people have a 4 to 7 percent risk of dying," said Lee.

These figures — 7.1 percent for chest CT and 3.9 percent for abdominopelvic CT — were much greater than the 1 percent long-term risk of death from radiation-induced cancer predicted by statistical models in both groups.

Lee also said that it was not just cancer patients who presented the greater risk because of their bleak prognosis. Patients getting scanned for trauma and abdominal pain, for example, still had a risk of death well above the risk in the general population. When they subtracted out cancer patients from the data set, the risk of death for the other groups ranged from 2.5 to 5 percent.

Given more recent efforts to reduce radiation dose with programs like Image Wisely and Image Gently, Lee said a follow-up study using more recent data would probably make the difference in mortality even more pronounced.

"We use half the dose at our institution now than we did for this study, so the risk has gone down now. For me that's reassuring because if you look at our study, most patients are only getting one to two scans. These efforts for dose reduction are an important thing for us to be doing," said Lee.

Related:


Interested in Medical Industry News? Subscribe to DOTmed's weekly news email and always be informed. Click here, it takes just 30 seconds.

You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment

Access and use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions of our LEGAL NOTICE & PRIVACY NOTICE
Property of and Proprietary to DOTmed.com, Inc. Copyright ©2001-2014 DOTmed.com, Inc.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED