dismiss

Be DOTmed’s Guest at FIME 2014 in Miami Beach Aug 6th-8th -- Get your Free Pass here

SEARCH
Current Location:
>
> This Story


Log in or Register to rate this News Story
Forward Printable StoryPrint Comment

Never Miss a Story

Sign up for email alerts

 

More Industry Headlines

Surgery better than endoscopy for some early esophageal cancers Leads to better outcomes

Medtronic acquires Visualase Expands neuroscience offerings

No anxiety over false positive CT lung cancer results May influence CMS's coverage decision

FDA approves Philips' mobile ultrasound Product for the globe

ACR calls for tomo coverage CMS will decide in October

Dunlee to introduce new tube at RSNA Company confirms continued commitment to tube manufacturing

Radiotherapy steps outside of cancer treatment Shows promise for heart disease

Setting the Standard: XR-29 and the Importance of CT Dose Optimization Next step to reducing dose

Data collection system personalizes cancer treatment Predicts possible side effects

Hidden info in PET images aids cancer treatment Largest study of its kind

Medical device manufacturers still seek 'clarity' on device tax for refurbished equipment, donations

by Brendon Nafziger , DOTmed News Associate Editor
The controversial 2.3 percent excise tax on medical device sales has already been in effect for a few months, but it's still causing confusion among manufacturers, a lobbyist group said.

In comments sent to the Internal Revenue Service last week, AdvaMed, a trade group, said they still lacked "clarity" on some issues, such as whether repaired or refurbished equipment were truly exempt from the tax. The group also wants to make sure that devices donated to doctors traveling on medical missions or providing disaster relief aren't taxed.

Story Continues Below Advertisement

Click to see a vision of improved quality of care in the OR

A mobile C-arm with low power can cause a unit to overheat, leaving your team waiting as valuable minutes tick by. Click to learn about the new Cios Alpha - delivering the most powerful generator available in a mobile C-arm



AdvaMed's letter comes at the close of the comment period for the IRS' final rules on the tax, which the agency released along with guidance for manufacturers in early December only a few weeks before the tax took effect on Jan. 1.

"It's a very challenging environment," Chris White, AdvaMed's general counsel and executive vice president, told DOTmed News. "To implement this tax has been extremely burdensome to our companies."

Murky legal precedent

Although federal attorneys had previously indicated in talks with IAMERS, a trade group for imaging equipment resellers, that most refurbished equipment would not be subject to the tax, AdvaMed said the status of repaired, modified or refurbished devices is still ultimately murky because of the legal history of excise taxes.

"Legally the interpretation of the medical device excise tax relies not just on specific guidance, but also all of those earlier decades of tax court decisions and other regulations in the excise tax area," White said. "Upon reflection and review of that body of precedent, it was our view that there wasn't sufficient clarity on how refurbishment and repairing would be treated under the law."

Because of that, the group is asking the IRS to do one of two things. Under one proposal, the IRS would spell out that the tax would only apply to new components separately listed with the Food and Drug Administration. (The tax itself only applies to medical devices listed with the FDA.)

White indicated this would most likely apply to capital equipment. Although he wouldn't name a specific category it would apply to, he said there could be a "component or element that needs to be repaired or refurbished, and to the extent that component is replaced and itself qualifies as a separately listed medical device, the tax would apply to the value of that component."

"This is a fair resolution. It avoids double taxation," he added.

The second solution would be what AdvaMed calls a "bright line safe harbor". In this proposal, the group wants the IRS to not tax repairs or modifications that represent less than, say, 75 percent of the value of the device. AdvaMed said there's precedent for such exemptions in truck remanufacturing, where truck and tractor bodies are also subject to a first-sale excise tax.

Medical missions

AdvaMed is also asking the IRS not to tax devices donated to doctors going on medical missions or disaster relief trips. White said in the IRS guidance for charitable exemptions, only specified entities — largely tax-exempt organizations, such as non-profits — appear to be eligible for the exemption, not private individuals.

"However, it's a bona fide charitable purpose," White said. "A company shouldn't be taxed for providing (a device) for a hurricane site or disaster area."

Device manufacturers had other requests, too. They're asking the IRS to reduce their paperwork burden by allowing those buying equipment for export or remanufacture to estimate total quarterly orders rather than provide information for each article. And they also want equipment loaned or given to doctors merely for demonstrations, and not for patient use, not to be subject to the tax.

White said they had no timeline on when they expect a response from the IRS.

Related:


Interested in Medical Industry News? Subscribe to DOTmed's weekly news email and always be informed. Click here, it takes just 30 seconds.

You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment

Access and use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions of our LEGAL NOTICE & PRIVACY NOTICE
Property of and Proprietary to DOTmed.com, Inc. Copyright ©2001-2014 DOTmed.com, Inc.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED