Current Location:
> This Story

Log in or Register to rate this News Story
Forward Printable StoryPrint Comment

Never Miss a Story

Sign up for email alerts


More Industry Headlines

UCLA not responsible for patient record release, could set legal precedent Doctors sharing access against facility rules not fault of institution

Texas MakerHealth Space will facilitate the creation of care solutions by nurses Providing tools from 3-D printers to Velcro

International institutions agree on standard for using MR to diagnose prostate cancer Cuts overdiagnosis by 89 percent

Siemens Healthcare selects David Pacitti as new head of North America business Pacitti will take over the position on October 19

Konica Minolta acquires Viztek Cites primary imaging solutions that provide more economic value as incentive to completing deal

228 lawmakers urge Congress to rethink proposed cuts to radiation therapy Prostate, breast could be cut by 25 and 19 percent respectively

Philips and MIT collaborate on better way to evaluate brain injuries Bringing the measurement of intracranial pressure out of the ICU

New wearable “e-patch” cuts health monitoring costs, improves quality Up to eight vital signs in a $10 disposable patch the size of a credit card

Annual mammo screening should start at 40, ACR reiterates Recognizing the benefits is critical to saving lives

Planned Dallas Proton Treatment Center files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy Billionaire investor is calling for new project leadership

Why new payment schemes will challenge nuclear medicine

By Peter J. Webner RT(N),CNMT with Tamar Thompson, MS, CCS-CCS-P

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued its proposed payment policy rules and regulations for Calendar Year 2014 on July 8, 2013. Upon initial review of the proposed regulations, my reaction was positive. The Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) rates for SPECT and PET, as well as Oncologic PET, received substantial proposed payment increase over CY 2013 payment rates.

Story Continues Below Advertisement

Servicing GE Nuclear Medicine equipment with OEM trained engineers

We offer full service contracts, PM contracts, rapid response, time and material, camera relocation. Nuclear medicine equipment service provider since 1975. Click or call now for more information 800 96 NUMED

However, as I read on, I quickly realized that the CMS is really proposing policies that ultimately lead to comprehensive Ambulatory Payment Classifications (APC) bundling for not only the 29 devices mentioned in the rule but, in effect, for almost all services provided in the OPPS care setting. The removal of status indicator X and the addition of status indicator Q1 along with the bundling of drugs that function as supplies (including stress agents), the collapse of five levels of Evaluation and Management (E/M) codes into one "G" nomenclature code, bundling of add-on procedure codes, and the bundling of laboratory services, could have devastating effects for the hospital community.

Although the bundling proposals are significant, the most concerning issue is that for the first time since the inception of the OPPS, CMS failed to release the data files to compliment their proposals, leaving the public with no way to replicate the proposal to determine the true value of the positive increases in payment or determine the negative impacts of the seven categories proposed for greater bundling.

Some of the immediate issues that I considered for the nuclear medicine community were:

—Bundling of the stress agents detracts focus from clinical decisions (i.e. efficiency and side effects) and instead limits provider and patient choice based upon financial incentives. Previously a hospital had the option to choose the most appropriate stress agent and be reimbursed for the full cost (plus 6% for pharmacy overhead) for that choice in addition to payment for supervision/interpretation of the stress study. Under this proposal, the agency will bundle all of these services into a single payment.

—The elimination of radiopharmaceutical to procedure edits means that hospitals are less likely to continue to fully report cost associated with nuclear medicine procedures thereby resulting in payment erosion over time.

—Packaging policies drive toward the use of generic drug products, and this concept might seem reasonable when you consider that the Technetium based SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging is off-patent and now generic or PET-based FDG or NAF. One notable exception to the bundling concept for a product that is no longer on patent is Rb82, where manufacturing, distribution, or cost recovery is a challenge since every site bears fixed costs for the generator but has variable volumes.

Continue reading Why new payment schemes will challenge nuclear medicine...
  Pages: 1 - 2 - 3 >>


Interested in Medical Industry News? Subscribe to DOTmed's weekly news email and always be informed. Click here, it takes just 30 seconds.

You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment

Increase Your
Brand Awareness
Auctions + Private Sales
Get The
Best Price
Buy Equipment/Parts
Find The
Lowest Price
Daily News
Read The
Latest News
Browse All
DOTmed Users
Ethics on DOTmed
View Our
Ethics Program
Gold Parts Vendor Program
Receive PH
Gold Service Dealer Program
Receive RFP/PS
Healthcare Providers
See all
HCP Tools
A Job
Parts Hunter +EasyPay
Get Parts
Recently Certified
View Recently
Certified Users
Recently Rated
View Recently
Certified Users
Rental Central
Rent Equipment
For Less
Sell Equipment/Parts
Get The
Most Money
Service Technicians Forum
Find Help
And Advice
Simple RFP
Get Equipment
Virtual Trade Show
Find Service
For Equipment
Access and use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions of our LEGAL NOTICE & PRIVACY NOTICE
Property of and Proprietary to, Inc. Copyright ©2001-2015, Inc.