SEARCH
Current Location:
>
> This Story


Log in or Register to rate this News Story
Forward Printable StoryPrint Send us your Comments

Never Miss a Story

Sign up for email alerts

 

More Industry Headlines

Pacemaker and ICD battery life needs to be extended to last 25 years Replacing batteries can lead to life-threatening infections

New telehealth legislation getting support from all angles CONNECT for Health Act gaining bipartisan, industry traction

Calling for a more personalized approach to preventing breast and ovarian cancers Psychological and medical risks need to be considered

Exposing the secrets of voodoo dolls through X-ray Virtual autopsy yields forensic insights in Haitian voodoo crimes

Portable seizure device yields unexpected mood benefits to PTSD patients Reduced sleeplessness, depression and nightmares by 30 percent

MR-compatible cardiac device implants add significant value to patient care A first-of-its-kind study finds value providers may be drawn to

Proton therapy is best for the most common pediatric brain tumor: study Medulloblastoma side effects diminished relative to conventional therapy

PET/CT beats CT and bone scans for detecting metastatic prostate cancer: study PET imaging of prostate has 'exploded' over last two years

Stryker to buy Sage for $2.8 billion HAI prevention product line expected to complement Stryker's offerings

Mathematical tool for MR may predict chance of migraines in concussion patients Shannon entropy may be more accurate than fractional anistropy

Price disclosure doesn't
always work, researchers find

Will Mandatory Medical Technology Price Disclosure Actually Increase Prices?

by Barbara Kram , Editor
A new study found that pending congressional legislation seeking the mandatory disclosure of prices for certain medical technologies would likely result in increased prices and "provide no tangible benefits to patients."

The study by Robert W. Hahn, senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and Hal J. Singer, president of Criterion Economics, examines the potential economic impact of the Transparency in Medical Device Pricing Act of 2007 (S. 2221), recently introduced in the U.S. Senate.

Story Continues Below Advertisement

CONNECT AS IF LIFE DEPENDS ON IT! Because in many ways it does

And we can help. Conserus™ offers a flexible, vendor-neutral suite of imaging solutions that help orchestrate interoperability between existing systems and among specialists while helping to simplify the transition from volume to value-based care.



In the report, the researchers review previous attempts by governments to impose price disclosure rules in a number of other industries including cell phones, groceries, cement, barges, railroads and long-distance telephone services. The authors use evidence from case studies and other sources to identify four conditions that, if satisfied, imply that mandatory price disclosure would provide large benefits to consumers or other purchasers.

"We found that mandatory price disclosure, as proposed in S.2221 is unlikely to benefit patients or hospitals and worse, will likely increase costs," said Hahn.

The authors write that in order for price disclosure to have a favorable effect, there must be large search costs that are reduced substantially, and that the pricing information disclosed be current. The industry-specific market conditions essential for lower prices to occur would require that any savings be passed on to end users, and that there is a large variation in the price paid by purchasers and consumers.

The report finds that the conditions that would likely result in large cost increases as the result of pricing disclosure are met.

Specifically, the report finds that:

* The medical device industry is concentrated among a few firms.
* There are few, if any, economical substitutes for many medical devices.
* Competitors repeatedly interact in the marketplace.
* Some medical devices are standardized whereas other devices are differentiated.
* Firms do not already know their rivals' prices.

The report's findings conclude that:

* Significant search costs for hospitals and patients would remain.
* Disclosure would not provide current price information since the data would be at least three months old.
* The structure of the healthcare industry would not ensure that hospitals pass cost savings on to consumers.

"Applying these conditions to the medical device industry, we conclude that mandatory price disclosure policy would likely increase prices hospitals pay for these products and provide no tangible benefit to patients," said the authors.

The study was supported by the Advanced Medical Technology Association.

More information and the full report are available at: www.criterioneconomics.com.





Related:


Interested in Medical Industry News? Subscribe to DOTmed's weekly news email and always be informed. Click here, it takes just 30 seconds.
Advertise
Increase Your
Brand Awareness
Auctions + Private Sales
Get The
Best Price
Buy Equipment/Parts
Find The
Lowest Price
Daily News
Read The
Latest News
Directory
Browse All
DOTmed Users
Ethics on DOTmed
View Our
Ethics Program
Gold Parts Vendor Program
Receive PH
Requests
Gold Service Dealer Program
Receive RFP/PS
Requests
Healthcare Providers
See all
HCP Tools
Jobs/Training
Find/Fill
A Job
Parts Hunter +EasyPay
Get Parts
Quotes
Recently Certified
View Recently
Certified Users
Recently Rated
View Recently
Certified Users
Rental Central
Rent Equipment
For Less
Sell Equipment/Parts
Get The
Most Money
Service Technicians Forum
Find Help
And Advice
Simple RFP
Get Equipment
Quotes
Virtual Trade Show
Find Service
For Equipment
Access and use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions of our LEGAL NOTICE & PRIVACY NOTICE
Property of and Proprietary to DOTmed.com, Inc. Copyright ©2001-2016 DOTmed.com, Inc.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED