The company has
provided DOTmed News
with an informative
backgrounder on
dementia diagnosis

Technology Backgrounder From Philips on Dementia

October 29, 2008
Dementia currently affects well over 25 million people worldwide and with the demographic shift to older populations it is set to reach epidemic proportions unless effective treatments can be found. The cost of today's treatment is already putting massive burdens on healthcare authorities and the societal impact on patients and their caregivers is immense.

Dementia is the end result of a number of progressive degenerative diseases of the brain. These diseases are associated with changes in brain chemistry that are thought to begin many years before patients suffer symptoms of cognitive impairment. The most common neurodegenerative diseases are Alzheimer's Disease, Lewy-body Dementia and Frontotemporal Dementia - accounting for around 60%, 15% and 10% of all dementia cases respectively. At the moment they are incurable. Current treatments, such as Cholinesterase inhibitors, provide symptomatic relief in the mild to moderate stages of the disease but do not arrest its progression. Alternative therapeutic options, currently under development, attempt to interrupt the disease process at an earlier stage. There is therefore a growing need for the early detection of neurodegenerative disease and reliable diagnosis of its underlying type.

Differential diagnosis
Currently, one of the most effective ways of diagnosing dementia in its earlier stages is by performing an FDG-PET brain scan - a Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scan carried out after injecting a Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) radio-active tracer into the patient's bloodstream. Being an analog of glucose, the FDG tracer tracks the localized uptake of glucose in the patient's brain. Areas of the brain causing dementia typically exhibit reduced glucose uptake - a condition known as hypometabolism. For Alzheimer's disease and Lewy Body Dementia, the areas affected are at the back of the brain, with only subtle differences in the distribution of these areas for the two diseases. For Frontotemporal Dementia, the area of the brain affected is normally towards the front.

Unfortunately, identifying hypometabolic areas in FDG-PET brain scan images requires a great deal of skill, because these areas only show up as subtly different shades of gray. This is why reliable interpretation of FDG-PET brain scans can normally only be done by a highly experienced expert.

Decision support
The decision support software that has been developed by Philips Research in collaboration with the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (Hamburg, Germany), aims to assist in the interpretation of the images to the point where accurate diagnoses can be made by less experienced physicians. This could make diagnostic services for the differential diagnosis of dementia much more widely available.

The Philips/University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf software works by performing three different steps. The first step is to spatially normalize the patient's brain-scan image by selecting, rotating and scaling the appropriate image slice in order to align it with a standard template. The second step is to compare this normalized image, voxel-by-voxel, with a library of normal (un-diseased) brain scans in order to identify hypometabolic regions in the patient's brain. After identifying and color highlighting these hypometabolic regions, the final step is to compare their size, shape and distribution against a set of disease-specific patterns for each type of dementia. The software then quantifies, in the form of a percentage value, the degree to which the patient's scan matches each disease-specific pattern. Ultimately, the diagnosing physician could take the percentages into account when arriving at his or her diagnosis.

Retrospective studies
In addition to being evaluated for feasibility and usability in a clinical setting by University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf's nuclear medicine department, with positive results, the accuracy with which the software can quantify a match between the patient's brain-scan images and disease-specific patterns has been tested in two retrospective studies.

Both of these studies involved using a library of brain scan images, each image having been previously examined by a clinical expert in order to arrive at a differential diagnosis. During the study, each of these images was analyzed by the software and a diagnostic conclusion drawn from its results, based on the disease-specific match percentages generated. These diagnostic conclusions were then compared to the differential diagnoses made previously by the clinical expert. Both studies employed a so-called 'leave-one-out cross-validation scheme', in which each patient's brain scan (the validation data) was compared to the disease-specific patterns in all the other brain scans (the training data). This is a well-known scheme for minimizing bias in tests where the data set size is limited.

In the first study, based on a University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf library of FDG-PET scans from 83 patients, the software achieved better than 98% correspondence with the clinical expert's interpretation, when programmed to differentiate between brain scans showing no signs of dementia, those showing characteristics of Alzheimer's disease and those showing characteristics of Frontotemporal Dementia.

In the second, 48-patient study using FDG-PET images provided by the Austin Hospital (Melbourne, Australia), the software achieved better than 80% correspondence when differentiating between scans that had been expert assessed as being un-diseased, suffering from Alzheimer's, suffering from Frontotemporal Dementia or suffering from Lewy Body Dementia. This second study, involving the differential diagnosis of four disease classes, was a greater test for the software than the first study, because indications of Alzheimer's and Lewy Body Dementia occur in similar areas of the brain. Nevertheless, the software was able to differentiate between them.

Following on from the encouraging results of these studies, Philips Research is conducting additional studies involving the software in collaboration with the University of Washington (Seattle, USA).

Reprinted with permission.

See a related story in DOTmed News:
https://www.dotmed.com/news/story/7182/