Pre-Bid now on 2000+ items! Our live auction is happening next Wednesday, November 2nd!

Current Location:
> This Story

Log in or Register to rate this News Story
Forward Printable StoryPrint Comment

Never Miss a Story

Sign Up For Weekly Top Stories


More Industry Headlines

FDA refurb docket workshop day one: no easy answers A range of valid viewpoints were brought to the podium in Silver Springs, Maryland today

Low-intensity ultrasound doesn’t improve recovery after surgery: international clinical trial Will this be the end of this popular treatment?

Baystate Health hit by 'phishing' attack Information on 13,000 patients was exposed to the cyber-invaders

Philips submits study to FDA to expand indications for its digital pathology solution Only one percent difference between digital and optical diagnosis

Can MR detect Alzheimer's before symptoms have even appeared? MGH team combines analytics and imaging to make brain asymmetry a dementia biomarker

FDA to radiologists: stop using any Multidata Systems devices At least two devices distributed in U.S. without FDA approval

FDA announces effort to 'modernize' device malfunction and injury reporting Curbing 'limited' reporting of adverse incidents

NJ law mandating dense breasts ultrasound and MR finds more cancer, reduces biopsies Requires insurance companies to pay for supplemental screening

How affordable toxicology, testing fight the drug epidemic More than 28,000 people died from opioid overdose in 2014

Precision medicine is having a big impact on breast cancer chemo decisions: study Test distinguishes high risk of recurrence from low risk

Are CT exams a great risk for young adults?

by Loren Bonner , DOTmed News Online Editor
The benefits of CT scanning outweigh the risks of radiation exposure in sick young adults, according to a study published in the journal Radiology this month.

As the public becomes more concerned about radiation-induced cancers from CT scanning, researchers from Massachusetts General Hospital wanted to try to better understand the risks and benefits of CT scanning in young adults who are sick and need CT scanning as part of their medical treatment.

Story Continues Below Advertisement

qualiTEE - reliabiliTEE - repairabiliTEE - we guaranTEE

Bayer HealthCare Multi Vendor Service will repair your probe with the same precision and care you provide to your patients. Call us at 1-844-MVS-5100 (1-844-687-5100) or visit www.ri.bayer.com

"My patients come to me with genuine concern [about radiation dose] and I wanted to look at the bigger picture to see past the scan and more to the fact that they have lymphoma or were hit by a car," Dr. Susanna Lee, chief of women's imaging at MGH, told DOTmed News.

Lee and her colleagues started out by looking at young adult patients who were scanned most frequently. These tended to be cancer patients, and the research team quickly realized that these patients were actually dying from their cancers before any of the concerns about the effects of long-term radiation could factor in.

Models predict that as humans age, cells become less sensitive to the mutagenic effects of radiation. In other words, the rate of radiation-induced cancer is higher in children and young adults. If they survive, they are more likely to live 10-20 years, which is the time it normally takes to develop a post-radiation malignancy.

For the study, Lee and her team decided to look at imaging records of every patient between 18 and 35 years old who had a chest or abdominopelvic CT scan at one of three university-affiliated hospitals in Boston between 2003-2007. Chest CT exams were most commonly ordered for cancer and trauma; and abdominal pain, trauma and cancer for abdominopelvic CT scans.

"What was surprising is that these patients are pretty sick. If you think about it the general risk of death in that age group after the five year follow-up period is like 1 percent, these people have a 4 to 7 percent risk of dying," said Lee.

These figures — 7.1 percent for chest CT and 3.9 percent for abdominopelvic CT — were much greater than the 1 percent long-term risk of death from radiation-induced cancer predicted by statistical models in both groups.

Lee also said that it was not just cancer patients who presented the greater risk because of their bleak prognosis. Patients getting scanned for trauma and abdominal pain, for example, still had a risk of death well above the risk in the general population. When they subtracted out cancer patients from the data set, the risk of death for the other groups ranged from 2.5 to 5 percent.

Given more recent efforts to reduce radiation dose with programs like Image Wisely and Image Gently, Lee said a follow-up study using more recent data would probably make the difference in mortality even more pronounced.

"We use half the dose at our institution now than we did for this study, so the risk has gone down now. For me that's reassuring because if you look at our study, most patients are only getting one to two scans. These efforts for dose reduction are an important thing for us to be doing," said Lee.


Interested in Medical Industry News? Subscribe to DOTmed's weekly news email and always be informed. Click here, it takes just 30 seconds.

You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment

Increase Your
Brand Awareness
Auctions + Private Sales
Get The
Best Price
Buy Equipment/Parts
Find The
Lowest Price
Daily News
Read The
Latest News
Browse All
DOTmed Users
Ethics on DOTmed
View Our
Ethics Program
Gold Parts Vendor Program
Receive PH
Gold Service Dealer Program
Receive RFP/PS
Healthcare Providers
See all
HCP Tools
A Job
Parts Hunter +EasyPay
Get Parts
Recently Certified
View Recently
Certified Users
Recently Rated
View Recently
Certified Users
Rental Central
Rent Equipment
For Less
Sell Equipment/Parts
Get The
Most Money
Service Technicians Forum
Find Help
And Advice
Simple RFP
Get Equipment
Virtual Trade Show
Find Service
For Equipment
Access and use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions of our LEGAL NOTICE & PRIVACY NOTICE
Property of and Proprietary to DOTmed.com, Inc. Copyright ©2001-2016 DOTmed.com, Inc.