DOTmed Home MRI Oncology Ultrasound Molecular Imaging X-Ray Cardiology Health IT Business Affairs
News Home Parts & Service Operating Room CT Women's Health Proton Therapy Endoscopy HTMs Mobile Imaging
SEARCH
Current Location:
>
> This Story


Log in or Register to rate this News Story
Forward Printable StoryPrint Comment

 

X-Ray Homepage

Shared Imaging provides mobile imaging systems to Kelsey-Seybold Clinic for monthly fee "Functional service" business model

Study suggests classifying Traumatic Brain Injury with new CT scoring systems 'Stockholm' and 'Helsinki' CT scores best for predicting patient outcomes

Proactive monitoring of imaging devices has far-reaching benefits Insights from UnityPoint Health on the value of CT and MR certainty

How is XR-29 impacting hospitals and their CT service agreements? Many facilities face choices and there's no single right answer

X-ray detectors projected to be worth over $3 billion by 2020 Flat panel detectors are fueling the market

Yale researchers develop SPECT/CT tracer to risk-stratify patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm Preclinical studies show promise

Cinematic rendering generates photorealistic images using CT and MR data May improve physician-patient communication

Connected radiology devices can maximize uptime How the radiology suite is discovering the benefits of internet connectivity

Samsung's upgraded BodyTom Elite CT scores FDA clearance Previous generation introduced six years ago

X-ray imaging may predict bunion recurrence after surgery Might also help develop new guidelines

CT said to be 'effective gatekeeper' for coronary angiography

by Thomas Dworetzky , Contributing Reporter
A new study has shown that computed tomography may prove a relatively safe approach to making a diagnosis of patients presenting with atypical angina or chest pain before performing invasive coronary angiography.

“CT increased the diagnostic yield and was a safe gatekeeper for coronary angiography, with no increase in long-term events,” Marc Dewey, Heisenberg professor of radiology at the Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Humboldt-Universität and Freie Universität zu Berlin in Germany and colleagues reported in the British Medical Journal.

Story Continues Below Advertisement

InfoView - Asset management simplified

Now, there's a powerful asset management tool that helps you effectively manage, monitor and control your clinical assets with improved financial and operational performance. InfoView - helping hospitals make better decisions. Click to learn more>>>



The found that “the length of stay was shortened by 22.9 hours with CT, and patients preferred noninvasive testing.”

A total of 340 female patients with suspected coronary artery disease and a clinical indication for coronary angiography on the basis of atypical angina or chest pain took part in the randomized study – 167 received CT and 172, coronary angiography.

“Cardiac CT reduced the need for coronary angiography from 100 percent to 14 percent,” the researchers reported. Coronary angiography did provide significantly more information needed to make a diagnosis – 75 percent, versus just 15 percent for CT.

Major procedural complications were rare and not significantly different between approaches. Exposure to radiation was also similar.

The patients were followed for an average of 3.3 years and both groups experienced similar rates of subsequent adverse cardiovascular episodes – seven for the CT group, six for the coronary angiography group.

There are advantages to using the more invasive approach, according to the authors. For one thing, it permits the “final diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease.”

It also allows for treatment and diagnosis during the same procedure as stenting may be done, and planning for future artery bypass grafting.

That said, they conclude that “the greatest clinical value of cardiac CT may be its ability to reliably rule out obstructive coronary artery disease” in these patients with atypical presentation and “a low-to-intermediate pretest probability of disease.”

An earlier study in the U.S. found that “CT did not improve clinical outcomes compared with functional testing.”

“In symptomatic patients with suspected chronic arterial disease, who required noninvasive testing, a strategy of initial computed tomographic angiography, as compared with functional testing, did not improve clinical outcomes over a median follow-up of two years,” researchers reported in the New England Journal of Medicine.

In the Scottish Computed Tomography of the Heart trial in rapid access chest pain clinics, however, CT appeared to “possibly” reduce myocardial infarction on follow-up, as reported in the Lancet.

“CT may also lead to fewer angina symptoms, downstream testing, and costs, while increasing exposure to radiation in patients with stable angina compared with functional testing,” according to the Scottish study.

X-Ray Homepage


You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment

Advertise
Increase Your
Brand Awareness
Auctions + Private Sales
Get The
Best Price
Buy Equipment/Parts
Find The
Lowest Price
Daily News
Read The
Latest News
Directory
Browse All
DOTmed Users
Ethics on DOTmed
View Our
Ethics Program
Gold Parts Vendor Program
Receive PH
Requests
Gold Service Dealer Program
Receive RFP/PS
Requests
Healthcare Providers
See all
HCP Tools
Jobs/Training
Find/Fill
A Job
Parts Hunter +EasyPay
Get Parts
Quotes
Recently Certified
View Recently
Certified Users
Recently Rated
View Recently
Certified Users
Rental Central
Rent Equipment
For Less
Sell Equipment/Parts
Get The
Most Money
Service Technicians Forum
Find Help
And Advice
Simple RFP
Get Equipment
Quotes
Virtual Trade Show
Find Service
For Equipment
Access and use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions of our LEGAL NOTICE & PRIVACY NOTICE
Property of and Proprietary to DOTmed.com, Inc. Copyright ©2001-2017 DOTmed.com, Inc.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED