dismiss

Mark your calendars: the next Clean Sweep Live Auction will be on Thursday, January 25th--Click to view the full catalogue

DOTmed Home MRI Oncology Ultrasound Molecular Imaging X-Ray Cardiology Health IT Business Affairs
News Home Parts & Service Operating Room CT Women's Health Proton Therapy Endoscopy HTMs Mobile Imaging
SEARCH
Current Location:
>
> This Story


Log in or Register to rate this News Story
Forward Printable StoryPrint Comment

 

 

More Industry Headlines

Donald Trump had a CT scan, here's what we learned President deemed healthy despite presence of heart disease

Bupa and HealthTap build personalized health records with AI Enhances quality, speed and convenience of care available

3D Systems and Stryker to enhance personalized surgical planning together Develop virtual surgical planning and anatomical models

Lower costs and rapid care for cardiology patients tied to eConsults May save payors more than $400 per patient

Burnout, depression continue to plague U.S. physicians New report highlights the growing burden of bureaucratic tasks on provider health

Cloud-based medical imaging informatics market to reach $830.5 million by 2021 Driven by need for cost-effective and flexible solutions

Allegheny Health Network first in Penn. to use Synaptive's robotic surgery system Specifically for cranial and spinal procedures

Hit with $6.2 billion charge, GE considering major shake-ups CEO Flannery 'deeply disappointed' and weighing all options

Ultrasound-based technology may be able to treat cancer Can it replace radiotherapy one day?

RaySearch to supply TPS for Japanese carbon ion therapy facility First RayStation carbon ion installation in Japan

The Supreme Court, the Lexmark case and implications for the health care industry

By Dan Vukelich
From the August 2017 issue of DOTmed HealthCare Business News magazine

Patent exhaustion, secondary markets, right to repair.

These elements were at play in the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Impression Products vs. Lexmark. At stake was the right of the plaintiff, Impression Products, to resell Lexmark printer cartridges. But as many media outlets have subsequently reported, the case was about so much more than printer cartridges, with far-reaching implications as printer giant Lexmark attempted to – as one media outlet reported – “crush printer reseller Impression Products.”

Story Continues Below Advertisement

Streamline Your Radiology Workflow with RamSoft's PowerServer RIS/PACS

The PowerServer RIS/PACS is a single database application, essential to reducing redundant work, limiting manual data entry, and increasing consistency throughout healthcare practices. Click to learn how it will help you improve patient care and more.



At the heart of the case is the right of consumers (and businesses) to own the goods outright that they purchase, protected by the first sale doctrine which limits the patent rights of the manufacturer. These elements have 150 years of standing and help to keep in check the threat of monopoly by the product makers. The underpinnings of modern-day commerce can be found in these doctrines that allow for consumers to own what they buy outright, and to trade and resell and repair what they own.

Essentially a power grab in the works, Lexmark was attempting to extend its patent rights post the sale of the printer cartridge. If successful in court, this had the potential to give manufacturers control over their products, through patent claims and litigation, well after their products were sold and Lexmark has been paid its price by the purchaser.

When the Association of Medical Device Reprocessors (AMDR), the global trade association representing the interests of commercial medical device reprocessing and remanufacturing companies, learned of the court rulings leading up to the U.S. Supreme Court case, we took action. AMDR joined advocacy groups, nonprofits and many leading technology companies and filed an amicus curiae (friend of the court) brief in support of Impression Products to underscore the importance of the long-standing ”first sale” doctrine at issue in this case.

In its brief, AMDR highlighted that, for over 150 years, the law has encouraged the right of consumers to reprocess, repair, recycle or resell their property as they see fit.

AMDR believes we have a duty and obligation to promote the safety, savings and sustainability benefits brought to health care by the medical device reprocessing industry, and we could not overlook any prospective threat to the industry or to our health care partners, so we filed the brief with the court.

AMDR members have been selling safe, lower-cost, FDA-regulated, reprocessed medical devices for 20 years. In addition to relying on FDA requirements, we’ve relied on the long-standing first sale doctrine to remanufacture medical devices that help reduce waste and that cost up to 40 percent less than original devices.

Ultimately, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Impression Products, and reasserted the first sale doctrine and patent exhaustion.
  Pages: 1 - 2 >>

Related:


You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment

Advertise
Increase Your
Brand Awareness
Auctions + Private Sales
Get The
Best Price
Buy Equipment/Parts
Find The
Lowest Price
Daily News
Read The
Latest News
Directory
Browse All
DOTmed Users
Ethics on DOTmed
View Our
Ethics Program
Gold Parts Vendor Program
Receive PH
Requests
Gold Service Dealer Program
Receive RFP/PS
Requests
Healthcare Providers
See all
HCP Tools
Jobs/Training
Find/Fill
A Job
Parts Hunter +EasyPay
Get Parts
Quotes
Recently Certified
View Recently
Certified Users
Recently Rated
View Recently
Certified Users
Rental Central
Rent Equipment
For Less
Sell Equipment/Parts
Get The
Most Money
Service Technicians Forum
Find Help
And Advice
Simple RFP
Get Equipment
Quotes
Virtual Trade Show
Find Service
For Equipment
Access and use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions of our LEGAL NOTICE & PRIVACY NOTICE
Property of and Proprietary to DOTmed.com, Inc. Copyright ©2001-2018 DOTmed.com, Inc.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED