is there someone who encountered this kind of problem...
when i do fastcal an error message appears" fastcal error, please exit and retry". i dont know what happen. when i check the error log it only says the event router of the primary receivers are out of service.. i can do tube warm up but when i do scan a series of ring artifacts appears in the image.
Ook, sorry for not reading it on the original post. Well, if you already tried checked the cam boards and tried everything discussed in this post, then the only two others things i can think of is: 1st the collimator may have trouble, check that when you set up an aperture it is the actual one you choose, you can also try a series of scan with diferent aperture to check if the trouble is with one specific. 2nd it is most unlikely, but if the tube moved enough that when you take an exposure and the radiation doesn't cover the whole detector, you could have a similar error with the fastcal and could still do the warmup. Wish you luck, and plz, when you found the problem post the solution, thanks
what we did is we check the tube por and it pass. we already remove and check the collimator and visually check and put it back and realligned.i think it is good.by the way we are using a G5 collimator. Now we did a test using detailed calibration and test. we use the parameters air and 120kv.then choose different aperture starting from 1mm 3mm 5mm 7mm and 10mm.one by one it failed and it only shows an error of detailed calibration error. please help
is there an effect for IG board? before we change the IG board. we use the IG board coming from the ct scan hispeeed advantage touch screen type. we have a system which is octane and it is a ct/i ct scan...thanks
so it doesnt matter if i use the ig board of the rpig? because when i run the reconfig the ig board is a lower revision and the software it use is for rp type ctscan. so the problem is not coming from the ig board
Therapeutic Technologies closeout auctions take place on DOTmed.com. Bid today on 538 lots of medical equipment. Inspections may be done by appointment. Hours are Monday through Friday 9am-4pm Contact chrisnuytens1@gmail.com to schedule.
Marivic Mendoza
ge ct/i octane system
September 12, 2013 08:10
please help...
is there someone who encountered this kind of problem...
when i do fastcal an error message appears" fastcal error, please exit and retry". i dont know what happen. when i check the error log it only says the event router of the primary receivers are out of service.. i can do tube warm up but when i do scan a series of ring artifacts appears in the image.
thanks
to rate and post a comment
tj raw
re: ge ct/i octane system
September 12, 2013 12:24
Are you located in California?
to rate and post a comment
Raymundo Yamamoto
re: ge ct/i octane system
September 12, 2013 07:08
there is not enough information, could be many things, are the artifacts rings or streaks???
to rate and post a comment
Marivic Mendoza
re: re: ge ct/i octane system
September 16, 2013 08:31
the artifacts are series of rings
to rate and post a comment
Raymundo Yamamoto
re: re: re: ge ct/i octane system
September 16, 2013 07:16
Ook, sorry for not reading it on the original post. Well, if you already tried checked the cam boards and tried everything discussed in this post, then the only two others things i can think of is: 1st the collimator may have trouble, check that when you set up an aperture it is the actual one you choose, you can also try a series of scan with diferent aperture to check if the trouble is with one specific. 2nd it is most unlikely, but if the tube moved enough that when you take an exposure and the radiation doesn't cover the whole detector, you could have a similar error with the fastcal and could still do the warmup. Wish you luck, and plz, when you found the problem post the solution, thanks
to rate and post a comment
Marivic Mendoza
re: re: re: re: ge ct/i octane system
September 17, 2013 08:36
what we did is we check the tube por and it pass. we already remove and check the collimator and visually check and put it back and realligned.i think it is good.by the way we are using a G5 collimator. Now we did a test using detailed calibration and test. we use the parameters air and 120kv.then choose different aperture starting from 1mm 3mm 5mm 7mm and 10mm.one by one it failed and it only shows an error of detailed calibration error. please help
to rate and post a comment
Francesco Palmieri
re: ge ct/i octane system
September 12, 2013 07:09
check that there are no faults or channels cam defective
to rate and post a comment
marivic
re: re: ge ct/i octane system
September 16, 2013 08:32
i already check the cam boards using diagnostic scan and all of my boards has a correct graph using means and sd
to rate and post a comment
Mark Parris
re: ge ct/i octane system
September 12, 2013 09:44
I would go into service , diagnostics, run dastools. You can find results in cd /usr/g/service/state and more the dastools.hist file
to rate and post a comment
marivic
re: re: ge ct/i octane system
September 16, 2013 08:31
when i go tto this location it says that there is no file
to rate and post a comment
Mark Parris
re: re: ge ct/i octane system
September 16, 2013 07:20
Example.
localhost.localdomain 1% cd /usr/g/service/state
localhost.localdomain 2% ls
AlignStateFile CCal_small_2x0.625.sprp raw.760YD9.2006-6-13.izs rawa2.zslope.2008-4-21.izs raw.zslope.2012-12-3.izs
balNum CCal_small_4x0.625.sprp rawa1.760YD9.2006-4-27.izs rawa2.zslope.2009-2-20.izs raw.zslope.2012-6-4.izs
baseline.raw.760YD9.2006-4-26.izs CCal_small_4x1.25.sprp rawa1.760YD9.2006-6-13.izs rawa2.zslope.2009-8-20.izs raw.zslope.2013-6-3.izs
baseline.rawa1.760YD9.2006-4-26.izs CCal_small_4x2.50.sprp rawa1.zslope.2007-7-12.izs rawa2.zslope.2010-11-11.izs RotorUptime.csv
baseline.rawa1.zslope.2007-1-12.izs CCal_small_4x3.75.sprp rawa1.zslope.2008-10-20.izs rawa2.zslope.2010-5-14.izs sdas/
baseline.rawa2.760YD9.2006-4-26.izs CCal_small_8x1.25.sprp rawa1.zslope.2008-4-21.izs rawa2.zslope.2011-12-7.izs ssw.calreport.hist
baseline.rawa2.zslope.2007-1-12.izs CCal_small_8x2.50.sprp rawa1.zslope.2009-2-20.izs rawa2.zslope.2011-5-11.izs ssw.CollimatorTest.hist
baseline.raw.zslope.2007-1-12.izs cnvBrdId.cfg rawa1.zslope.2009-8-20.izs rawa2.zslope.2012-12-3.izs ssw.dastools_auto01.hist
CCal_large_16x0.625.sprp CollCalState rawa1.zslope.2010-11-11.izs rawa2.zslope.2012-6-4.izs ssw.dastools.hist
CCal_large_16x1.25.sprp config_tracker/ rawa1.zslope.2010-5-14.izs rawa2.zslope.2013-6-3.izs ssw.diagSession.hist
CCal_large_2x0.625.sprp CurrCfgInfo rawa1.zslope.2011-12-7.izs raw.zslope.2007-7-12.izs ssw.GenCal.hist
CCal_large_4x0.625.sprp CurrSysCfgInfo rawa1.zslope.2011-5-11.izs raw.zslope.2008-10-20.izs ssw.mylar_check.hist
CCal_large_4x1.25.sprp DasReportIndex* rawa1.zslope.2012-12-3.izs raw.zslope.2008-4-21.izs ssw.srv_activity.ref
CCal_large_4x2.50.sprp diag_playback_file.txt rawa1.zslope.2012-6-4.izs raw.zslope.2009-2-20.izs ssw.sysBalanceMon.hist
CCal_large_4x3.75.sprp image_analysis.log rawa1.zslope.2013-6-3.izs raw.zslope.2009-8-20.izs ssw.tracking.hist
CCal_large_8x1.25.sprp image_analysis_summary.txt rawa2.760YD9.2006-4-27.izs raw.zslope.2010-11-11.izs ssw.tube_align.hist
CCal_large_8x2.50.sprp mdas/ rawa2.760YD9.2006-6-13.izs raw.zslope.2010-5-14.izs TubeSpits.csv
CCal_small_16x0.625.sprp mdas16/ rawa2.zslope.2007-7-12.izs raw.zslope.2011-12-7.izs UsageAnalysis.csv
CCal_small_16x1.25.sprp raw.760YD9.2006-4-27.izs rawa2.zslope.2008-10-20.izs raw.zslope.2011-5-11.izs
localhost.localdomain 3%
to rate and post a comment
marivic
re: ge ct/i octane system
September 12, 2013 09:45
is there an effect for IG board? before we change the IG board. we use the IG board coming from the ct scan hispeeed advantage touch screen type. we have a system which is octane and it is a ct/i ct scan...thanks
to rate and post a comment
Kim Schofield
re: re: ge ct/i octane system
September 13, 2013 07:51
The IG's in the RPIG and the CT/i are the same.
to rate and post a comment
Marivic Mendoza
re: re: re: ge ct/i octane system
September 16, 2013 08:31
so it doesnt matter if i use the ig board of the rpig? because when i run the reconfig the ig board is a lower revision and the software it use is for rp type ctscan. so the problem is not coming from the ig board
to rate and post a comment