Current Location: DOTmed News > Industry Headlines > This Story

Log in or Register to rate this News Story
Forward Printable StoryPrint Comment


More Industry Headlines

Philips suspends CT and PET/CT production at Ohio facility Setback for customers and the company.

Varian's seven year patent dispute comes to an end Company will pay about $35 million.

FDA OKs GE's new CT scanner Ideal for challenging cases.

MRI technique can help treat concussion patients Measures white brain matter damage.

What's the big-picture impact of HIT on health care? Q&A with thought leader Bipin Thomas.

Special report: Contrast media One size does not fit all.

ABT's compact biomarker generator comes to Russia Ideal for the growing Russian market.

ClearMRI gets FDA clearance for MRI adaptor New option to extend the life of MRI systems.

Sebelius steps down from HHS post Sylvia Mathews Burwell to succeed Sebelius.

Physician payment data now available CMS releases records and AMA pushes back.

Industry: Medical device tax endangers 43,000 jobs

by Brendon Nafziger , DOTmed News Associate Editor
An industry-funded report says a 2.3 percent excise tax on medical device manufacturers set to go into effect in 2013 could endanger almost 43,000 U.S. jobs while making health care slightly more expensive to consumers.

In a report released Wednesday, the Advanced Medical Technology Association, a trade lobby, said the coming tax will cut into companies' revenues and force them to move manufacturing facilities offshore in order to escape the growing U.S. tax burden.

Story Continues Below Advertisement

Dunlee - Design, Manufacture & Distribution of CT & Rad X-Ray Products

Dunlee manufactures replacement tubes for more CT systems than any other company in the industry. Philips, GE, Picker, Shimadzu, Siemens, Elscint or Toshiba replacement tubes for all popular systems. Call 800.238.3780

"The device tax could cost thousands of jobs, depending on the cutback and what percent of the industry moves offshore," Diana Furchtgott-Roth, co-author of the report and a senior fellow with the Manhattan Institute, a New York-based think tank, told reporters on a call Wednesday. "We assume a loss of about 43,000 jobs in the medical device industry, if for example just 10 percent of manufacturers' activity moves offshore."

The group also warns that the tax could stifle U.S innovation and give a leg up to foreign competitors. Also, because the tax applies to revenue, and not profits, companies with smaller profit margins could be devastated, and end up owing Uncle Sam money despite operating at a loss.

The tax was included in the Affordable Care Act and is meant to raise $20 billion over the next decade to help pay for the costs of health reform -- that is, adding millions of new Americans to the insurance rolls. Earlier versions of the bill included a higher tax on device companies, but it was brought down for the final bill.

Direct-to-consumer and retail products like contact lenses are exempt from the tax, although it's unclear if it applies to home equipment, like motorized wheelchairs.

While the actual guidelines have to be finalized, the study, "Employment Effects of the New Excise Tax on the Medical Device Industry," tried to calculate the effect on employers when the tax comes online, from what's known now.

Naturally, when faced with the tax, companies will try to make up for it by raising prices and cutting costs. That is, part of the tax would be passed on to consumers: the researchers estimate after-tax prices for devices could rise about 1 percent. But also, companies could shift some amount of employment overseas.

The authors say under "reasonable assumptions" up to 10 percent of jobs could move abroad, resulting in U.S. job losses of 43,000 and labor compensation losses of about $3.5 billion.

In 2009, the domestic device manufacturing industry employed over 400,000 people, who earned about $33 billion in labor compensation, according to the study.

Continue reading Industry: Medical device tax endangers 43,000 jobs...
  Pages: 1 - 2 >>

Interested in Medical Industry News? Subscribe to DOTmed's weekly news email and always be informed. Click here, it takes just 30 seconds.

medical device tax
by Galen Hiveley on September 08, 2011
Leave it to our government. They've screwed up the health care
industry which is 1/6 of the nations GDP. They've thrown the
country into a depression and are too dumb to realize it. We need
to change Washington while there is still something left of the
country. 2012 is the earliest we can do it. We just all have to
hope there is something left of the country at that time and that
it can still be salvaged.

Obama Care, Med. Dev. Tax, All Around Killer
by Ted Huss on September 08, 2011
This is a healthcare plan with it's own virus. A plan that is
actually a parasite (kills its host).
Reforming healthcare is definitely needed, but this big
government solution is about as far from what will have a
positive effect for consumers, taxpayers and business as one can
get. My customers are really going to enjoy adding 2.3% to their
average sales taxes of 8-9.5%. Yeah, sure. Will they delay
purchases, do without? You bet. Just like you do if you are on a
limited budget and make choices at the market.

Excise/privilege tax on medical devices?
by Jeff Buske on September 10, 2011
An excise tax is a privilege tax on par with sales (also an
excise) taxes on staple food items levied by for example, Boulder
Colorado and other cities.  Twisted logic being eating and
medical devices/treatments are a privilege.  One more way to keep
people from getting fat or living to long to collect SS. 
Consider Dr. Ron Paul a medical Doc. not an attorney or
flip-flopper to restore common sense to DC.

P.S. You can avoid the tax and FDA approval cost by making
"non-medical" airport/security x-ray scanners. New systems can
still check you for kidney stones.

GE beat them to the punch!
by Jeff Buske on September 10, 2011
Brendon, perhaps moving companies out of the US was one purpose
of the tax part of the new "Jobs program?" GE x-ray/Med Systems
ironically is now moving to China, looks like they got a jump on
the competition.   RONPAUL2012

You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment

Access and use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions of our LEGAL NOTICE & PRIVACY NOTICE
Property of and Proprietary to, Inc. Copyright ©2001-2014, Inc.