DOTmed Home MRI Oncology Ultrasound Molecular Imaging X-Ray Cardiology Health IT Business Affairs
News Home Parts & Service Operating Room CT Women's Health Proton Therapy Endoscopy HTMs Mobile Imaging
Current Location:
> This Story

Log in or Register to rate this News Story
Forward Printable StoryPrint Send us your Comments


More Industry Headlines

AHRA 2018 product showcase Some of the products and services on display at the event

AHRA 2018 exhibitors A few of the companies you won't want to miss in Orlando

Study: CT use possibly linked to higher risk for brain tumors Exudes greater amounts of radiation than other modalities

Low-risk patients subject to costly, unnecessary breast imaging, says study Ranges from $2,000 to $8,000, creates high-deductible burdens

Lumitron to develop laser-based X-ray systems with higher image resolution than CT Image resolution 100 times better than CT, 1000 times better than X-ray

Secondary image interpretations on the rise, says study Increasing demand among clinicians, greater acceptance by payors

A look back at the history of mammography Robert Salomon's 1913 research showed there were different types of breast cancer

RCM: The untapped potential for lab valuation Challenges abound in the lab market

ECRI to fill guidance void left by shutdown of NGC website Launching interim website with clinical practice guidelines this fall

Israel grants $33 milion to GE, Medtronic, Change Healthcare to boost R&D Bringing high-quality jobs and biotech innovation to the country

William R. Hendee
(Image courtesy the
American Association of
Physicists in Medicine)

Radiologists call for national plan to tackle medical imaging overuse

by Brendon Nafziger , DOTmed News Associate Editor
How are imaging exams like antibiotics? Both might get prescribed too often, ratcheting up health care costs.

Patient demand, lack of guideline awareness and even financial conflicts of interest have contributed to the growth of unnecessary medical imaging, a group of high-profile radiologists argue, and they think the profession should crack down on it.

In an article in the October issue of Radiology, a team of radiologists call for a national strategy to tackle medical imaging overuse, saying educating patients and referring physicians while developing intelligent ordering software could help curb the number of unnecessary studies performed.

The paper sums up the American Board of Radiology Foundation's two-day summit held in Washington, D.C. last August to discuss overuse of medical imaging.

One of the trickiest aspects of the problem is understanding exactly how much of a problem there really is.

"It's hard to get a handle on," William R. Hendee, co-author of the study and professor of radiology, radiation oncology and biophysics at Medical College of Wisconsin in Milwaukee, told DOTmed News.

Because negative findings are useful to rule out pathology and so much of care is personalized, it's tough to determine when an imaging study is truly unnecessary, unless it's obviously redundant - that is, a physician unwittingly orders a duplicate exam.

Still, Hendee said it is generally held that 25 to 50 percent of exams are medically unnecessary.

"But it's a soft number," Hendee acknowledges.

Regardless of the scope, the radiologists say curbing overuse of imaging can help with two important goals: reining in escalating health care costs and allaying fears of medical radiation from imaging creating the very cancer it's meant to discover.

According to the paper, health care spending is currently 16 percent of gross domestic product, but the Congressional Budget Office predicts that at the current rate, in five years it will be one-fifth of the GDP, and almost half by 2082.

While imaging certainly isn't solely to blame for health care's growing bite out of the national budget, its costs have grown at twice the rate of other health care technologies, such as drugs and lab tests, the paper's authors argue.

Perhaps more significantly, medicine is accounting for a growing proportion of the average American's yearly radiation exposure.

In 1980, medical radiation contributed to less than a quarter of the public's radiation exposure, according to the study. Now, it accounts for nearly half. While many of the imaging exams are performed on the elderly, who have less of a risk of dying from slow-growing cancers triggered by radiation exposure, the young are increasingly getting affected, too.
  Pages: 1 - 2 - 3 >>


Increase Your
Brand Awareness
Auctions + Private Sales
Get The
Best Price
Buy Equipment/Parts
Find The
Lowest Price
Daily News
Read The
Latest News
Browse All
DOTmed Users
Ethics on DOTmed
View Our
Ethics Program
Gold Parts Vendor Program
Receive PH
Gold Service Dealer Program
Receive RFP/PS
Healthcare Providers
See all
HCP Tools
A Job
Parts Hunter +EasyPay
Get Parts
Recently Certified
View Recently
Certified Users
Recently Rated
View Recently
Certified Users
Rental Central
Rent Equipment
For Less
Sell Equipment/Parts
Get The
Most Money
Service Technicians Forum
Find Help
And Advice
Simple RFP
Get Equipment
Virtual Trade Show
Find Service
For Equipment
Access and use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions of our LEGAL NOTICE & PRIVACY NOTICE
Property of and Proprietary to, Inc. Copyright ©2001-2018, Inc.