DOTmed Home MRI Oncology Ultrasound Molecular Imaging X-Ray Cardiology Health IT Business Affairs
News Home Parts & Service Operating Room CT Women's Health Proton Therapy Endoscopy HTMs Mobile Imaging
Current Location:
> This Story

Log in or Register to rate this News Story
Forward Printable StoryPrint Comment


More Industry Headlines

Canon elaborates on financial goals with Toshiba Medical in the fold 'Launching into the global health marker ... in one fell swoop'

Sectra report addresses value of machine learning in radiology Concept of automatic characterization and scoring of lesions has great support

SuperSonic Imagine introduces Aixplorer Ultimate ultrasound system Enhances possibility of detecting breast and liver diseases

REMSA and Flirtey to launch first U.S. emergency drone delivery program Getting AEDs to patients ASAP

Philips scores FDA clearance for small parts ultrasound imaging solution Available for EPIQ 7 and 5 and Affiniti 70 systems

What’s new in MR scanners and coils? A review of new innovations arriving on market

Soccer club PSV Eindhoven utilizes Philips Lumify portable ultrasound Assesses injuries of players immediately at the point of care

NuVasive files lawsuit against former vice chairman Alleges breach of fiduciary duties and violation of contractual obligations

Faxitron scores FDA clearance for its VersaVision digital specimen radiography system Detector enables five times more geometric magnification

Former Cleveland Clinic Innovations director pleads guilty to fraud Scheme cost the institution over $2.7 million

IRS issues regs on $20 billion medical device tax

by Brendon Nafziger , DOTmed News Associate Editor
The medical device industry continues to bang the drum over a $20 billion excise tax it says will eat into profits and drive jobs overseas, as the Internal Revenue Service releases proposed regulations for implementing the tax.

On Friday, the Internal Revenue Service issued its proposed rules for the 2.3 percent tax on manufacturers and device importers, which Stephen Ubl, president of the Advanced Medical Technology Association, an industry lobby, called an "anti-competitive, job-killing tax."

Story Continues Below Advertisement

Inspiring a Better Healthcare System- We are the new Change Healthcare

Last spring the majority of McKesson Technology Solutions and Change Healthcare came together, forming a new health IT company with one focus - inspiring a better healthcare system. Click above to learn more.

"The anticipated tax has already forced companies to lay off workers and to reduce critical R&D that will help drive the next wave of treatments and cures," he said in a statement, calling on Congress and the Obama administration to repeal the tax.

The tax, which goes into effect next year, was included in the Affordable Care Act and is meant to raise $20 billion over the next decade to help pay for the costs of health reform -- that is, adding millions of new Americans to the insurance rolls. Earlier versions of the bill included a higher tax on device companies, but it was brought down for the final bill.

The IRS' proposed regulations are aimed partly at clearing up any confusion about what constitutes a "taxable" medical device, largely arguing that devices are subject to the tax if they fall within the Food and Drug Administration's domain and are human-use products.

For instance, the proposed regulations say human devices used in veterinary medicine are taxable, although purely veterinary products are not. Investigational devices, on the other hand, which have not been cleared by the FDA for typical marketing, are not taxable.

One sticky point has been over what counts as a "consumer" medical item, such as eyeglasses, contact lenses and hearing aids, which are specifically excluded from the tax. In its proposals, the IRS offered some "non-exclusive" guidelines as to what constitutes such a product, such as whether it needs to be operated by a medical professional or demands a large, upfront investment out of the financial reach of the ordinary American. The agency is also putting forth a safe harbor provision that includes devices, such as those contained within an FDA database for over-the-counter tests, that are exempt.

IRS is accepting comments on the proposals until May 7, and is holding a public hearing on the issue May 16.



Wayne Horsman

Tax Policy

February 10, 2012 09:16

It has been my understanding that one of the goals of government taxation policy is to reduce something that is undesirable (alcohol, cigarettes, pollution, etc.). In other words, tax it more if you want less of it. Are medical devices undesirable? -- A "targeted tax" (ie: gas tax to pay for roads) is more of a "user fee" than a tax. It is intended to generate revenue to pay for a government expense caused by a particular set of users. Is this tax intended to pay the cost of running the device portion of the FDA?

Log inor Register

to rate and post a comment

You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment

Increase Your
Brand Awareness
Auctions + Private Sales
Get The
Best Price
Buy Equipment/Parts
Find The
Lowest Price
Daily News
Read The
Latest News
Browse All
DOTmed Users
Ethics on DOTmed
View Our
Ethics Program
Gold Parts Vendor Program
Receive PH
Gold Service Dealer Program
Receive RFP/PS
Healthcare Providers
See all
HCP Tools
A Job
Parts Hunter +EasyPay
Get Parts
Recently Certified
View Recently
Certified Users
Recently Rated
View Recently
Certified Users
Rental Central
Rent Equipment
For Less
Sell Equipment/Parts
Get The
Most Money
Service Technicians Forum
Find Help
And Advice
Simple RFP
Get Equipment
Virtual Trade Show
Find Service
For Equipment
Access and use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions of our LEGAL NOTICE & PRIVACY NOTICE
Property of and Proprietary to, Inc. Copyright ©2001-2017, Inc.