Teleradiology: job-killer, or lifesaver?

Teleradiology: job-killer, or lifesaver?

by Nancy Ryerson, Staff Writer | December 30, 2013
A vRad teleradiologist
views images
From the December 2013 issue of HealthCare Business News magazine

When teleradiology companies first appeared back in the 1990s, they operated under cover of darkness. Like the Tooth Fairy spiriting away molars from beneath pillows, teleradiologists would read late-night studies and have them waiting for on-site radiologists first thing in the morning for a final read.

Today, it’s a very different scene. Teleradiologists now work during the day, and they’re generally based in the U.S. Hospitals task them with final reads, rather than preliminary, and a wide swath of specialists provide valuable reads from far away.

Telerad companies estimate that around 50 percent of hospitals are now using their service. The technology that allows for teleradiology — robust PACS, cloud storage and other image sharing techniques – is even more ubiquitous.

THE (LEADER) IN MEDICAL IMAGING TECHNOLOGY SINCE 1982. SALES-SERVICE-REPAIR

Special-Pricing Available on Medical Displays, Patient Monitors, Recorders, Printers, Media, Ultrasound Machines, and Cameras.This includes Top Brands such as SONY, BARCO, NDS, NEC, LG, EDAN, EIZO, ELO, FSN, PANASONIC, MITSUBISHI, OLYMPUS, & WIDE.

“In a way, teleradiology has really been adopted by all practices in the country,” said Ben Strong, medical director of Virtual Radiologic, or vRad, the largest radiology practice in the country. “They may not be using a third-party teleradiology vendor, but they understand the need to distribute studies digitally, and use it on a local and possibly regional basis.”

Despite its widespread use, teleradiology stills stirs up significant controversy in the radiology world. Some radiology groups have vowed to “take back the night” to regain lost ground. Meanwhile, teleradiology continues to widen its scope, connecting hospitals with specialists and offering the last word on studies.

Final answers
One of the main changes shaking up teleradiology, and the way it’s viewed, has been a shift from preliminary reads to final reads performed off-site. In 2007, CMS ruled that only radiology cases read in the U.S. could be billed for reimbursement. At the time, most teleradiologists were based internationally so they could read during daytime hours while it was night on the other side of the world. The cases they read were preliminary, to be looked over again in the morning by an on-site counterpart. As more teleradiology companies have hired U.S.-based radiologists, more have been able to offer final, billable reads.

“Preliminary reads will go the way of the dinosaurs in a few years as more and more cost pressures come down on hospitals,” says Paul Johnson, vice president of sales and marketing at Aris Radiology. Today, 80 percent of his company’s interpretations are final reads.

Johnson argues that preliminary reads are inefficient, and that teleradiologists, just like their on-site counterparts, can be trusted to provide reliable final looks. “There’s one big benefit of the preliminary reading process, and that comes in the fact that every study that’s re-read is a built-in quality assurance process. But it is inefficient,” says Johnson.

You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment