DOTmed Home MRI Oncology Ultrasound Molecular Imaging X-Ray Cardiology Health IT Business Affairs
News Home Parts & Service Operating Room CT Women's Health Proton Therapy Endoscopy HTMs Mobile Imaging
SEARCH
Current Location:
>
> This Story


Log in or Register to rate this News Story
Forward Printable StoryPrint Comment

 

 

Molecular Imaging Homepage

SNMMI Exhibitor's Guide A few of the companies you'll want to visit with on the show floor

Q&A with Dr. Satoshi Minoshima, incoming President of SNMMI Find out what to expect at the big event and over the next year

Bruker unveils ParaVision 360 and AVANCE NEO solutions at ISMRM ParaVision 360 now provides preclinical imaging for MR and PET/MR

In PET and SPECT, getting more sensitive and working smarter A look at the newest systems on the market

IBA to install second US-based Cyclone 70 system in Arizona Supply medical isotopes for diagnosis and treatment of critical diseases

A new role for PET in interventional procedures Potential benefits to bringing portable PET imaging to the clinical marketplace

New model boosts flow efficiency of particle accelerators May lead to smaller accelerators, easier to operate at reduced costs

Are bundled payments hurting nuclear medicine access and innovation? An issue of 'supplies' versus 'drugs'

Henri Becquerel and the origins of radioactivity How Röntgen's discovery of the X-ray quickly influenced another scientist

Gordon Gunnlaugsson SHINE Appoints new member to board of directors

NOPR and others urge CMS to reconsider NaF PET coverage

by John R. Fischer , Staff Reporter
Patients prescribed a PET scan with 18F-sodium fluoride will still have to dip into their own pockets following the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ rejection of a request to reconsider covering the contrast agent.

Written and signed by the National Oncologic PET Registry (NOPR) working group, the request called for CMS to reevaluate its National Coverage Determination for NaF PET on the basis that the substance provided more appropriate forms of care to patients.

Story Continues Below Advertisement

Servicing GE Nuclear Medicine equipment with OEM trained engineers

We offer full service contracts, PM contracts, rapid response, time and material,camera relocation. Nuclear medicine equipment service provider since 1975. Click or call now for more information 800 96 NUMED



"The NOPR data clearly show that use of NaF PET led to more appropriate care for many cancer patients. We urge CMS to reconsider coverage for these potentially lifesaving and life-improving exams," NOPR principal investigator Dr. Bruce Hillner, said in a statement.

Following its closure of NOPR in December 2017, CMS chose to restrict reimbursements for the use of NAF PET in detecting cancerous bone metastases, asserting that such scans are “not reasonable and necessary to diagnose or treat an illness or injury or to improve the functioning of a malformed body member,” in a memo.

The agency agreed to continue reimbursing NaF-18 PET with evidence development programs for 24 months as it awaited the publication of evidence in The Journal of Nuclear Medicine, the findings of which ultimately supported the notion that the contrast agent offers more appropriate palliative and curative care in patient management.

The peer-review journal also approved of its use in 2016 as part of a pilot study that associated it with better clinical outcomes and patient survival.

Backing the NOPR proposal is the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, which made its own recommendations to CMS about the agent in March, along with The World Molecular Imaging Society (WMIS) and the American College of Radiology.

All three collaborated with CMS and NOPR upon its launch in 2011 to collect clinical utility data supporting the use of NaF-18 PET. NOPR used applied these findings to more than 65,000 scans it performed on Medicare beneficiaries in that time.

Despite the recommendations and evidence, CMS declined the NOPR request, citing the information provided as insufficient.

"Many seniors may ultimately receive care that is not as effective or helpful as it could be if CMS does not reconsider Medicare coverage for NaF PET,” NOPR co-chair Dr. Anthony Shields said in a statement. “This is a step backward in care for these patients. We urge CMS to reconsider coverage so that these seniors can have access to care that can better help them.”

WMIS, ACR and SNMMI will continue to collaborate with CMS to establish Medicare coverage and access for patients to NaF PET.

Molecular Imaging Homepage


You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment

Advertise
Increase Your
Brand Awareness
Auctions + Private Sales
Get The
Best Price
Buy Equipment/Parts
Find The
Lowest Price
Daily News
Read The
Latest News
Directory
Browse All
DOTmed Users
Ethics on DOTmed
View Our
Ethics Program
Gold Parts Vendor Program
Receive PH
Requests
Gold Service Dealer Program
Receive RFP/PS
Requests
Healthcare Providers
See all
HCP Tools
Jobs/Training
Find/Fill
A Job
Parts Hunter +EasyPay
Get Parts
Quotes
Recently Certified
View Recently
Certified Users
Recently Rated
View Recently
Certified Users
Rental Central
Rent Equipment
For Less
Sell Equipment/Parts
Get The
Most Money
Service Technicians Forum
Find Help
And Advice
Simple RFP
Get Equipment
Quotes
Virtual Trade Show
Find Service
For Equipment
Access and use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions of our LEGAL NOTICE & PRIVACY NOTICE
Property of and Proprietary to DOTmed.com, Inc. Copyright ©2001-2018 DOTmed.com, Inc.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED