Clean Sweep Live Auction on Thur. March 28th. Click to view the full inventory

DOTmed Home MRI Oncology Ultrasound Molecular Imaging X-Ray Cardiology Health IT Business Affairs
News Home Parts & Service Operating Room CT Women's Health Proton Therapy Endoscopy HTMs Mobile Imaging
Current Location:
> This Story

Log in or Register to rate this News Story
Forward Printable StoryPrint Comment



Parts And Service Homepage

GE sued for allegedly 'freezing-out' ISOs in anesthesia equipment maintenance Lawsuit claims monopolistic practices

MITA publishes QMS standard for servicing of imaging devices First standard dedicated to servicing of medical imaging devices

Varex Imaging and H+P Advanced Technology to build carbon nanotube company Expect to see products come out in two-to-three years

Varex Imaging expands service offering to Europe, releases new tube and detector line at ECR Provide technical and logistical support for installations

Probo Medical acquires Trisonics Now offers an extensive ultrasound service division

MITA's remanufacturing white paper recalls 'Groundhog Day' movie: IAMERS A call for forward thinking and community awareness

MITA proposes framework for defining 'service' versus 'remanufacturing' Also points to the need for quality management systems to be implemented

Is there life after EOL for medical imaging equipment? Ken Hable of Technical Prospects discusses why the concept of 'end of life' is a falsehood

FDA extends deadline for device servicing docket comments One more month for equipment stakeholders to make their voices heard

Merry X-Ray acquires Conquest Imaging Ultrasound repair leader joins growing imaging ISO

Nonresident medical device sellers operating in CA may face fines with few options for compliance

An editorial by Robert J. Kerwin

In California, the Board of Pharmacy, which regulates matters pertaining to wholesaling of medical devices, is requiring sellers of medical devices who do not reside in California (“nonresident wholesalers”) to have a wholesalers’ license from their home state or else be subjected to a fine for conducting business in California without an appropriate license. This, despite the fact that many states do not issue medical device wholesalers’ licenses.

Story Continues Below Advertisement

RaySafe helps you avoid unnecessary radiation

RaySafe solutions are designed to minimize the need for user interaction, bringing unprecedented simplicity & usability to the X-ray room. We're committed to establishing a radiation safety culture wherever technicians & medical staff encounter radiation.

Subdivision (h) of section 4161 of the California Business and Professions Code provides that “a nonresident wholesaler ... shall at all times maintain a valid unexpired license ... to conduct the business of the wholesaler ... in compliance with the laws of the state in which it is a resident.”

IAMERS has raised concerns directly with the CA Board of Pharmacy about this practice because in many instances it is impossible to obtain a home state license if the home state does not have a wholesale licensing procedure. Although there are over 30 states with no specific "wholesaler" licensing program, the board has declined to suspend this practice of fining nonresident sellers of medical equipment for failing to meet the out-of-state wholesaler requirements.

The net effect of this California enforcement policy, if it continues to require a home state wholesaler’s license, is that many medical device companies that have a principal place of business in a state other than California may be found in violation of applicable CA Board of Pharmacy regulations. When IAMERS raised this concern to the CA Board of Pharmacy, IAMERS was initially told that it was best for medical device companies to lobby their home state legislatures to seek implementation of a home state wholesale licensing program.

Such a recommendation, for a variety of reasons, is not really workable, or something which could be recommended. A subsequent conference with the CA Board of Pharmacy's executive director did not result in any relief.

Though not directly suggested, some sellers have begun to consider whether opening an office in California is a viable alternative, given the potential for multiple fines.

Could a regulation of this type (for which no alternative compliance solution is apparently possible) be inconsistent with the Commerce Clause which has long been interpreted to preclude states from passing legislation that discriminates against or excessively burdens interstate commerce?

Robert J. Kerwin
We are hopeful that our concerns are misplaced, but nonresident medical device sellers should be aware of the CA Bureau of Pharmacy’s Out-of-State Wholesaler Requirements.

About the author: Robert J. Kerwin is general counsel for IAMERS, the International Association of Medical Equipment Remarketers and Servicers.

Parts And Service Homepage

You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment

Increase Your
Brand Awareness
Auctions + Private Sales
Get The
Best Price
Buy Equipment/Parts
Find The
Lowest Price
Daily News
Read The
Latest News
Browse All
DOTmed Users
Ethics on DOTmed
View Our
Ethics Program
Gold Parts Vendor Program
Receive PH
Gold Service Dealer Program
Receive RFP/PS
Healthcare Providers
See all
HCP Tools
A Job
Parts Hunter +EasyPay
Get Parts
Recently Certified
View Recently
Certified Users
Recently Rated
View Recently
Certified Users
Rental Central
Rent Equipment
For Less
Sell Equipment/Parts
Get The
Most Money
Service Technicians Forum
Find Help
And Advice
Simple RFP
Get Equipment
Virtual Trade Show
Find Service
For Equipment
Access and use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions of our LEGAL NOTICE & PRIVACY NOTICE
Property of and Proprietary to DOTmed.com, Inc. Copyright ©2001-2019 DOTmed.com, Inc.