by
John R. Fischer, Senior Reporter | October 22, 2021
But another study in 2019 said that breast MR
may lead to unnecessary biopsies and found that while it found more breast cancers, breast MR combined with mammography showed no difference in distinguishing breast cancer from other findings (sensitivity) or ruling cancer out (specificity), compared to mammography alone. The combination also resulted in twice as many biopsies.
Breast MR also requires a lot of time to complete, though this has been partially remedied with the introduction of abbreviated breast MR. A group of South Korean researchers earlier this year found that using abbreviated breast MR
reduced scanning time from 30 minutes to 10 minutes and was able to reduce costs, while still efficiently identifying signs of cancer.
Ad Statistics
Times Displayed: 173813
Times Visited: 3176 For those who need to move fast and expand clinical capabilities -- and would love new equipment -- the uCT 550 Advance offers a new fully configured 80-slice CT in up to 2 weeks with routine maintenance and parts and Software Upgrades for Life™ included.
U.S. and German researchers found in 2020 that abbreviated MR
was better than digital breast tomosynthesis in detecting breast cancer. “Our study confirmed that AB-MR in women at average risk with dense breast tissue outperforms 3D mammography by a factor of 2.4 times in detecting women with breast cancer. And not only does it find more cancer, but it finds invasive and high-grade cancers not found on the 3D mammography,” Dr. Christopher Comstock, of MSK and the study’s lead author, told HCB News at the time.
The findings for the current study were published by Oxford University Press in the
Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
Back to HCB News