Over 1650 Total Lots Up For Auction at Five Locations - NJ Cleansweep 05/07, NJ Cleansweep 05/08, CA 05/09, CO 05/12, PA 05/15

Top 10 CT stories of the year

by Gus Iversen, Editor in Chief | December 14, 2022
CT X-Ray
From the November 2022 issue of HealthCare Business News magazine


EDs see jump in chest, abdominopelvic CT scans for trauma-related injuries

In August, researchers showed that chest and abdominopelvic CT scans rose among commercially insured patients for trauma-related ED visits between 2011 and 2018.

stats
DOTmed text ad

We repair MRI Coils, RF amplifiers, Gradient Amplifiers and Injectors.

MIT labs, experts in Multi-Vendor component level repair of: MRI Coils, RF amplifiers, Gradient Amplifiers Contrast Media Injectors. System repairs, sub-assembly repairs, component level repairs, refurbish/calibrate. info@mitlabsusa.com/+1 (305) 470-8013

stats

The largest gains were seen for single-encounter thoracabdominopelvic CT exams, which increased from 3.4 to 9.8 (1.16 per year) per 1,000 trauma-related ED encounters; and for minor injuries, which went from 1.1 to 4.6 (1.18).

This has raised concerns about higher costs and the detection of incidental findings. “Further investigation is warranted to explore the potential benefit of single-encounter thoracabdominopelvic CT examinations in patients with minor injuries, as well as strategies to optimize order appropriateness,” wrote first author Dr. Ninad Salastekar, from the department of radiology and imaging sciences at Emory University School of Medicine, in a statement.

Salastekar and his team studied trauma-related ED encounters recorded in national claims that they extracted from the IBM MarketScan Commercial Database. ED encounters were organized using the Injury Severity Score (minor, intermediate, major) through the International Classification of Diseases codes. They assessed chest CT, abdominopelvic CT and single-encounter thoracoabdominopelvic CT.

Intermediate and major injury CT scans also rose, from 6.4 to 16.4 (1.16); and 99.6 to 179.9 (1.08), respectively.

The study was published in the American Journal of Roentgenology.

You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment