dismiss

Come visit us at Booth 901 at AHRMM in Washington, DC
Mark your calendars! On August 2nd is our upcoming LIVE Clean Sweep Auction

DOTmed Home MRI Oncology Ultrasound Molecular Imaging X-Ray Cardiology Health IT Business Affairs
News Home Parts & Service Operating Room CT Women's Health Proton Therapy Endoscopy HTMs Mobile Imaging
SEARCH
Current Location:
>
> This Story


Log in or Register to rate this News Story
Forward Printable StoryPrint Comment

 

More Industry Headlines

Research team develops surgical glue that's visible with CT, X-ray and ultrasound Viable alternative to surgical staples

Medic Vision receives U.S. patent for XR-29 Dose-Check system 'Fully expects' imaging service providers to respect its patent rights

GE Healthcare, Jefferson Health partner for $1 billion in efficiencies Eight-year deal will put over 100 GE staffers into 13 network hospitals

PET scans could improve dementia diagnosis in two-thirds of patients 'A swift and accurate diagnosis has a huge impact on access to Alzheimer's treatments.'

ECRI launches its ValuVu product evaluation workflow platform Designed for supply chain and value analysis professionals

Mayo launches new $1.5 billion integrated Epic EHR system Customized to 'specific needs of Mayo Clinic patients and staff'

Philips acquires ultrasound software company TomTec Third deal in the past thirty days

fMR imaging reveals how well PTSD patients will respond to therapy Paving the way to more personalized treatment

New payment models and consumer trends put spotlight on patient satisfaction Providers need a better understanding of patient satisfaction: Study

IAMERS partners with AAMI to enhance best practices New quality management systems will take aim at cybersecurity

A thermography chest
image. (Credit: FDA)

FDA warns women about mammography 'alternative'

by Brendon Nafziger , DOTmed News Associate Editor
The Food and Drug Administration has warned women to be wary of an infrared-imaging technique some websites tout as a "radiation-free" alternative to mammography.

The agency told consumers Thursday that a technique that uses infrared imaging to measure heat and blood flow, called thermography, should not be used in place of mammography for cancer screening or diagnosis.

Story Continues Below Advertisement

The (#1 Resource) for Medical Imaging and Peripherals. Call 1-949-273-8000

As a Master Distributor for major brands Barco, Philips, and Sony, we offer custom imaging solutions. With our renowned OEM Solutions and Service/Repair Center, Ampronix is a one-stop shop for HD Medical LCD Displays--Printers--Recorders--4K Cameras



The agency also said this year alone it had already sent a trio of warning letters to those whom the agency said promoted the "inappropriate use" of the technology. Recipients of the letters include a manufacturer of a thermography device, a natural health website and a California breast imaging center, the agency said.

The agency said some thermography promoters claimed thermography could diagnose breast cancer by itself or even catch pre-cancerous growths years before mammography would discover them. Neither claim is supported by scientific evidence, the FDA said.

"While there is plenty of evidence that mammography is effective in breast cancer detection, there is simply no evidence that thermography can take its place," Dr. Helen Barr, director of the Division of Mammography Quality and Radiation Programs in the FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health, said in a statement.

Thermography uses an infrared camera to measure differences in temperature, producing an infrared image familiar to anyone who has seen the movie "Predator." The FDA has cleared thermography devices for use as an adjunct to other technologies but not for use by itself to diagnose or screen for cancer.

Writing about the misleading promotional claims surrounding thermography on the Science-Based Medicine blog last year, Dr. David Gorski, a cancer surgeon, said the idea behind thermography is that potentially dangerous tumors need to be fed by new blood vessels, which result in increased blood flow and thus, increased heat. Also, breast cancers have increased metabolic activity and inflammation, which could also lead to higher heat.

But Gorski and other imaging and cancer experts say the studies so far done on the technology since the first thermography scan in 1956 are not convincing.

"It's unreliable, and it doesn't provide much in the way of anatomic information that allows a better localization of the breast cancers it does find," Gorski wrote last year.

Both the American College of Radiology and the Society of Breast Imaging have issued statements saying they don't support using the device even as an adjunct to mammography, saying that the research on the technology -- mostly decades old -- hasn't shown it to be effective.

"The position of the American College of Radiology is that thermography has not been demonstrated to have value as a screening, diagnostic or adjunctive imaging tool," the group said in a statement this week. "We are pleased that the FDA has taken this step to clarify its view on thermography."

In a message posted to its website, SBI said most research on thermogaphy has not been done on women who would make up a screening population, nor have researchers compared the modality to mammography with technologies proven to increase diagnostic accuracy, such as ultrasound, breast MRI or nuclear medicine.

Related:


(313)
(16)
(5)

Jose Morillo

A SAFE ALTERNATIVE IS URGENT

June 09, 2011 03:39

I had serviced these machines, I has place my hand under the compressor device and test in my hand the pressure women support on her bust.. It's like a teenager step on your hand. Radiation itself mean a big problem due each bust receive two shoots each year. If termal imaging can solve the problem, a comparative study can probe it in few years. IT MUST BE INVESTIGATE!. High resolution ecógraphy, MRI, blood testing, etc. No option must be subestimated! perhaps to blend two or more of those exams and correlationate results can aid to avoid or reduce the needed of mammographies.

I think is cheaper than develope a new tecnology and faster try to apply well known technologies than wait for a new one.

Log inor Register

to rate and post a comment

You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment

Advertise
Increase Your
Brand Awareness
Auctions + Private Sales
Get The
Best Price
Buy Equipment/Parts
Find The
Lowest Price
Daily News
Read The
Latest News
Directory
Browse All
DOTmed Users
Ethics on DOTmed
View Our
Ethics Program
Gold Parts Vendor Program
Receive PH
Requests
Gold Service Dealer Program
Receive RFP/PS
Requests
Healthcare Providers
See all
HCP Tools
Jobs/Training
Find/Fill
A Job
Parts Hunter +EasyPay
Get Parts
Quotes
Recently Certified
View Recently
Certified Users
Recently Rated
View Recently
Certified Users
Rental Central
Rent Equipment
For Less
Sell Equipment/Parts
Get The
Most Money
Service Technicians Forum
Find Help
And Advice
Simple RFP
Get Equipment
Quotes
Virtual Trade Show
Find Service
For Equipment
Access and use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions of our LEGAL NOTICE & PRIVACY NOTICE
Property of and Proprietary to DOTmed.com, Inc. Copyright ©2001-2017 DOTmed.com, Inc.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED