Pre-Bid now on over 2000 items...our LIVE Auction is happening November 2nd

Current Location:
> This Story

Log in or Register to rate this News Story
Forward Printable StoryPrint Comment

Never Miss a Story

Sign Up For Weekly Top Stories


More Industry Headlines

More children visiting ED for headaches — but fewer getting CT scans Medication is being prescribed more frequently

One third of breast cancer patients aren't receiving follow-up imaging exams Can more guidelines resolve the problem?

IBA showcases Cyclone KIUBE cyclotron at EANM Can generate up to 300 doses of FDG in 2 hours

The medical chiller owner’s survival guide ...Or, how not to lose your cool

WSU researchers develop way to detect cancer with an iPhone Eight-channel spectrometer shown to be 99 percent accurate

Researchers use MR to guide stem cell therapy for neurological disorders Provides the resolution that's needed

Alternative Mo-99 SPECT isotope in development Production on alternative metals could stabilize supply

Abbott in $1.2 billion deal to sell device businesses to Terumo Transaction depends on the completion of Abbott's St. Jude acquisition

With MR, researchers say they have found the root cause of depression Could lead to more effective treatments

Philips partners with FluoroPharma to enhance CardioPET tracer image quality: EANM Study data presented at EANM annual congress

Medical device tax repeal bill, take two

by Brendon Nafziger , DOTmed News Associate Editor
A Minnesota congressman is hoping the second time's a charm for a bill to repeal the medical device tax.

Rep. Erik Paulsen, a Republican, and his co-sponsor Rep. Ron Kind, a Wisconsin Democrat, introduced a bill Wednesday to repeal the 2.3 percent excise tax on medical devices that went into effect this year.

Story Continues Below Advertisement

Streamline Your Radiology Workflow with RamSoft's PowerServer RIS/PACS

The PowerServer RIS/PACS is a single database application, essential to reducing redundant work, limiting manual data entry, and increasing consistency throughout healthcare practices. Click to learn how it will help you improve patient care and more.

H.R. 523, or the Protect Medical Innovation Act, has 175 cosponsors, including 20 Democrats, according to the congressman's office. It was introduced a day after House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, a Virginia Republican, renewed calls to scrap the tax during a speech at the American Enterprise Institute.

The bill is something of a repeat of H.R. 436, which Paulsen introduced last Congress. It soared through the GOP-controlled House in a 270-146 vote, split largely down party lines, over the summer, but the Senate, held by Democrats, never considered the matter.

Will this time be different? Two senators from states with big medical device industries, Orrin Hatch, a Utah Republican, and Amy Klobuchar, a Minnesota Democrat, are introducing a companion Senate bill, probably on Thursday.

Sponsors for the Senate bill haven't been announced, but industry watchers are hoping for more cross-the-aisle support for both the House and Senate versions of the legislation.

"When Congressman Paulsen introduced his first bill, it began with almost exclusively Republican support," Brian Connell, the director of government relations for the Medical Imaging & Trade Alliance, an OEM group that supports the bill, told DOTmed News. "What we're excited about this time is we're starting from a place of bipartisanship."

The facts on the ground are also different. Paulsen's office said as the tax has already taken effect, reports of job losses are helping to push politicians from both parties to work toward repeal.

Although it's disputed what effect the tax has on jobs, the medical device sector in Minnesota, Klobuchar and Paulsen's home state, is facing a rash of layoffs. Minnesota Public Radio reported Tuesday that Boston Scientific, St. Jude and Medtronic all announced plans to cut some 800 jobs in the state last year. Last week, Boston Scientific also said it would cut up to 1,000 more jobs worldwide, according to MPR. It's not clear, of course, what effect, if any, the tax had on those planned job cuts, but they still sting, especially in a wobbly economy.

Nonetheless, getting Democrats on board for the repeal does have challenges. President Obama has already indicated he doesn't want repeal to go through. And last year, only 37 Democrats crossed the aisle to vote with Republicans on the House bill. However, in December, 18 Democratic senators did petition Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to delay implementing the tax, so repeal does have some support in the upper chambers.

Connell says in any case MITA hopes lawmakers will be listening to voices close to home.

"I think folks are starting to see the impact across communities in terms of how much their local device companies are paying (in taxes), and how they're mitigating that loss" in terms of cuts to R&D and hiring workers, he says.


Interested in Medical Industry News? Subscribe to DOTmed's weekly news email and always be informed. Click here, it takes just 30 seconds.

Sean Reilly

Bill Number

February 11, 2013 04:49

I believe the correct Bill number for the "Protect Medical Innovation Act of 2011" is H.R. 436, yes?

Log inor Register

to rate and post a comment

You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment

Increase Your
Brand Awareness
Auctions + Private Sales
Get The
Best Price
Buy Equipment/Parts
Find The
Lowest Price
Daily News
Read The
Latest News
Browse All
DOTmed Users
Ethics on DOTmed
View Our
Ethics Program
Gold Parts Vendor Program
Receive PH
Gold Service Dealer Program
Receive RFP/PS
Healthcare Providers
See all
HCP Tools
A Job
Parts Hunter +EasyPay
Get Parts
Recently Certified
View Recently
Certified Users
Recently Rated
View Recently
Certified Users
Rental Central
Rent Equipment
For Less
Sell Equipment/Parts
Get The
Most Money
Service Technicians Forum
Find Help
And Advice
Simple RFP
Get Equipment
Virtual Trade Show
Find Service
For Equipment
Access and use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions of our LEGAL NOTICE & PRIVACY NOTICE
Property of and Proprietary to DOTmed.com, Inc. Copyright ©2001-2016 DOTmed.com, Inc.