DOTmed Home MRI Oncology Ultrasound Molecular Imaging X-Ray Cardiology Health IT Business Affairs
News Home Parts & Service Operating Room CT Women's Health Proton Therapy Endoscopy HTMs Mobile Imaging
SEARCH
Current Location:
>
> This Story


Log in or Register to rate this News Story
Forward Printable StoryPrint Comment
advertisement

 

advertisement

 

Women's Health Homepage

Putting the patient at the center of breast care Insights from Agnes Berzsenyi, president and CEO of GE Healthcare Women’s Health

Beyond detection: How DBT utilization rates impact facility benchmarks New evidence suggests 3D mammo could be as beneficial to providers as it is to patients

Merit Medical Systems closes acquisition of Cianna Medical Deal worth $135 million with possible additional incentivized payments

Remembering Dr. Nancy Cappello A patient advocate and champion of breast density awareness has passed away, but not without leaving her mark on the world

Screenings reduce risk of breast cancer death by 47-60 percent: study New research confirms what most physicians have long believed

Could a new technique make ultrasound interpretation easier? Enhanced contrast, considers intensity and duration of echoes

DBT detects 34 percent more cancers than 2D mammo Increased recall rate should not be a concern, expert says

Are women at low risk undergoing unneeded imaging due to dense breasts? Breast density notification laws may have unintended consequences

Is AI a match for manual interpretation of breast density? Study equates algorithm to experienced mammographer

Etta Pisano American College of Radiology names chief research officer

Mammography recall rate of 12-14 percent may be optimal: study

by John W. Mitchell , Senior Correspondent
The long-standing issue of the optimal number of mammography recalls just got stirred up again with the publication of a new study published this month in the American Journal of Roentgenology.

A research team from several hospitals in the Chicago area have pegged the ideal recall rate at 12 to 14 percent, or the "sweet spot."

Story Continues Below Advertisement

Click to visit GE Healthcare Service Shop for ultrasound probe solutions

Get reliable ultrasound probe replacements, faster repair, and service coverage you can count on with GE Healthcare. Service Shop gives customers on-demand access to over 100 OEM new, used, and refurbished probe replacements.



According to the study, this rate "suggests that the mean recall recommendation by the Breast Cancer Screening Consortium (BCSC) (10%) may be too low." The BCSC 10 percent rate was set in a 2007 published study, which also asserted that "at a recall rate of 12.3%, the estimated AW/ACD...suggests little benefit for any higher recall rate."

"I have been conducting medical outcome audits since beginning my breast imaging career in 1999...," Dr. Paula Grabler, lead author and medical director at Rush Oak Park Hospital told HCB News. "From conducting the audits it became clear to me that the national recommended guidelines for recall and cancer detection rates may not reflect optimal performance in detecting early stage breast cancers."

The study reviewed 984 screen-detected cancers from a total of 188,959 digital screening mammograms generated by 19 breast radiologists. A total of 75 annual calculated recall rates by radiologists were analyzed at less than 10, 10 to 12, 12 to 14 and higher than 14 percent rate. The researchers were then able to arrive at a statistically significant difference at the 12-14 percent recall rate, which associated with finding the most breast cancer.

"The findings were not a surprise. They confirmed my informal observations," said Grabler. "I think the jury is still out on the reaction to this study. Some of my colleagues in Chicago have expressed gratitude that this study supports recall rates higher than those currently recommended."

According to the study, in the past, critics have speculated that the higher cancer detection rates generated by the higher recall rates may be due to the detection of "insignificant" cancers which do no progress to invasive types of cancer. However, the study found no difference between these less serious cancers for each recall subgroup.

Grabler acknowledged the study has limitations.

"What I consider most important is that breast imagers use their medical outcome audit to evaluate their work and assess if there is a need for change and what those changes may be. Simply increasing recall rates will not necessarily result in increased cancer detections rates," she said.

Graber also noted that the role of 3D mammography/tomosynthesis in decreasing recall rates without decreasing cancer detection rates is important. This was not an area addressed in the study, but she said is currently being explored in the literature.

Women's Health Homepage


You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment

Advertise
Increase Your
Brand Awareness
Auctions + Private Sales
Get The
Best Price
Buy Equipment/Parts
Find The
Lowest Price
Daily News
Read The
Latest News
Directory
Browse All
DOTmed Users
Ethics on DOTmed
View Our
Ethics Program
Gold Parts Vendor Program
Receive PH
Requests
Gold Service Dealer Program
Receive RFP/PS
Requests
Healthcare Providers
See all
HCP Tools
Jobs/Training
Find/Fill
A Job
Parts Hunter +EasyPay
Get Parts
Quotes
Recently Certified
View Recently
Certified Users
Recently Rated
View Recently
Certified Users
Rental Central
Rent Equipment
For Less
Sell Equipment/Parts
Get The
Most Money
Service Technicians Forum
Find Help
And Advice
Simple RFP
Get Equipment
Quotes
Virtual Trade Show
Find Service
For Equipment
Access and use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions of our LEGAL NOTICE & PRIVACY NOTICE
Property of and Proprietary to DOTmed.com, Inc. Copyright ©2001-2018 DOTmed.com, Inc.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED