While the CsI detector is a major part of this equation, the software of the vendor you choose has great influence on the final image, as well.

The investment mindset
So, is there any reason not to switch to DR? That comes down to really one thing: upfront cost.
While cost is always a concern, it is important to consider upgrading to DR as an investment. As mentioned earlier, saved time can directly translate into money saved, usually due to the ability to perform a greater number of exams each day.

There is also the cost of maintaining CR cassettes to consider. Because the processor disassembles and reassembles CR cassettes with each use, this results in inevitable--and not insignificant--wear and tear. Remember, the DR panel requires no manual processing.

Avoid reimbursement reduction
Finally, there is the upcoming Medicare reimbursement reduction slated to begin in this year for facilities that have not made the switch to DR.

As part of an initiative to encourage U.S. healthcare providers to adopt DR, Medicare began reducing payments for analog x-ray exams in 2017. This year, even sites using CR will begin to see reimbursement fall—first by seven percent for five years, and then by ten percent.

Changing from CR to DR is a decision every radiology department must consider, eventually, if they haven’t already. At a certain level, the question isn’t as much if, but when, and understanding the differences between CR and DR and even amongst differing DR systems is vital.

About the Author: Marshall Smith is a Clinical Specialist with Novarad Corporation. As a healthcare professional in the field of radiology with over ten years of experience, Marshall has experience in radiology department management and PACS administration. He graduated Magna Cum Laude from Weber State University with Bachelor’s Degree in Advanced Radiologic Science. He is a certified Radiology Technologist (R)(CT) and an active member of the American Society of Radiologic Technologists (ASRT).

Back to HCB News

X-Ray Homepage