DOTmed Home MRI Oncology Ultrasound Molecular Imaging X-Ray Cardiology Health IT Business Affairs
News Home Parts & Service Operating Room CT Women's Health Proton Therapy Endoscopy HTMs Mobile Imaging
Current Location:
> This Story

starstarstarstarstar (1)
Log in or Register to rate this News Story
Forward Printable StoryPrint Comment



Parts And Service Homepage

Biomedical perspectives: Q&A with Andrew Rich Discussing the ways biomedical engineering is evolving and the advantages major hospitals have when negotiating with OEMs

Chronos Imaging sells 100th CT X-ray tube in under three months Moving quickly after acquiring the former Dunlee CT tube facility from Philips

Experts talk third-party service and other HTM issues at AAMI A call for smarter collaboration and a level playing field in the equipment service industry

Glassbeam unveils AI anomaly detection for imaging modality maintenance Allowing better awareness for tube temperature, waterflow changes

Lessons from the frontlines of install/deinstall projects Moving imaging equipment in and out of the facility is a massive job

Richardson unveils replacement tube for Toshiba CT systems The ALTA750 is compatible with wide range of scanners

FDA report opposes regulating third-party servicers Evidence for public health concern deemed 'not sufficient'

Planning a better future for OEMs and ISOs Can they co-exist and thrive in the Age of Accelerations?

The time is now for HTM departments to shed legacy CMMS for cloud-based EAM solutions Asset management in the era of digital transformation

New MR 'glove' brings hand joint movement into focus High-impedance coils woven into cotton may have other applications too

What's happening with the MITA service standard?

An editorial by Robert Kerwin

On January 12, 2018, the Medical Imaging Technology Association (MITA), a division of the National Electrical Manufacturers Association, held a conference call of the canvass group (including independent servicers) and observers.

The purpose of the meeting was to review the results of the first ballot on the proposed MITA American National Standard for Servicing of Medical Imaging Devices. After eight months of standards committee meetings, the MITA canvass group members had failed to approve the standard. All the OEMS had voted to accept the standard. Virtually all the ISOs and the HTM professionals had voted in the negative. The required percentage of canvass group members necessary to approve the proposed standard (67 percent) was not achieved.

Story Continues Below Advertisement


Special-Pricing Available on Medical Displays, Patient Monitors, Recorders, Printers, Media, Ultrasound Machines, and Cameras.This includes Top Brands such as SONY, BARCO, NDS, NEC, LG, EDAN, EIZO, ELO, FSN, PANASONIC, MITSUBISHI, OLYMPUS, & WIDE.

Some sought a more comprehensive quality management system that covered all medical equipment, not just imaging equipment. Some thought that the source document should not be the manufacturer regulation, 21 CFR 820, but rather ISO 9001:2015 or ISO 13485:2016.

IAMERS submitted a comment to the effect that it believed the draft failed to address patient safety responsibilities of the manufacturer to cooperate in providing access to service keys, passwords and training. With the current MITA draft largely based on the quality management system regulation of manufacturers, 21 CFR 820, IAMERS was concerned that it would have the practical effect of excluding some servicers from complying, as the sections pertaining to, among other things, training, testing and equipment maintenance could not be met without addressing manufacturer responsibilities for cooperation.

During the January 2018 call, further input was solicited by MITA as to the reasons for the negative vote and where to go from here. ACCE noted that the current draft limits itself to medical imaging equipment. ACCE advised the call participants that in their view any QMS standard should be applied to servicers of all types of medical equipment. ACCE also restated its concern that the current draft was largely based on a QMS regulation tailored for manufacturers.

One canvass member suggested that MITA might not be the best facilitator for a standard as that member felt there was too much distrust, and suspicion that this could be an effort to protect a revenue stream and not really an initiative to improve safety.

Citing the example of NEMA/MITA XR-29 standard, which was incorporated into P.L. 113-93, I expressed concern that there might be an effort to incorporate the servicing standard into upcoming legislation. MITA advised that this was not their current intent but acknowledged that the MITA draft standard had been provided to certain Congressional staff who had expressed an interest in receiving it.
  Pages: 1 - 2 >>

Parts And Service Homepage

You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment

Increase Your
Brand Awareness
Auctions + Private Sales
Get The
Best Price
Buy Equipment/Parts
Find The
Lowest Price
Daily News
Read The
Latest News
Browse All
DOTmed Users
Ethics on DOTmed
View Our
Ethics Program
Gold Parts Vendor Program
Receive PH
Gold Service Dealer Program
Receive RFP/PS
Healthcare Providers
See all
HCP Tools
A Job
Parts Hunter +EasyPay
Get Parts
Recently Certified
View Recently
Certified Users
Recently Rated
View Recently
Certified Users
Rental Central
Rent Equipment
For Less
Sell Equipment/Parts
Get The
Most Money
Service Technicians Forum
Find Help
And Advice
Simple RFP
Get Equipment
Virtual Trade Show
Find Service
For Equipment
Access and use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions of our LEGAL NOTICE & PRIVACY NOTICE
Property of and Proprietary to, Inc. Copyright ©2001-2018, Inc.