DOTmed Home MRI Oncology Ultrasound Molecular Imaging X-Ray Cardiology Health IT Business Affairs
News Home Parts & Service Operating Room CT Women's Health Proton Therapy Endoscopy HTMs Pediatrics
Current Location:
> This Story

Log in or Register to rate this News Story
Forward Printable StoryPrint Comment




Women's Health Homepage

Breast MR for cancer survivors may result in unnecessary biopsies No difference in sensitivity compared to mammography alone

One-third of breast cancer patients not aware of minimal scarring surgery Remote incisions can avert physical and psychological impacts of scarring

American Society of Breast Surgeons proposes new screening guidelines ACR voices support for new approach, which is based on individual patient risk

Q&A with Danilo Gennari Discussing what DeHCA Light & Sound brings to breast cancer diagnoses

Latest ACP mammo guidelines elicit strong opposition Experts say findings could lead to 10,000 more breast cancer deaths annually

Study supports 3D mammography for older women, contrary to USPTSF recommendation New data sheds light on risk-benefit ratio of screening older patients

FDA proposes changes to mammography regulations First agency efforts to 'modernize' breast screening in over two decades

Volpara and GE expand breast density software partnership GE will become global distributor of VolparaDensity software

Not all breast density laws are created equally Research shows that the wording of some notifications result in supplemental testing, others don't

3D mammography helps avoid unnecessary breast biopsies, says study 33 percent difference in biopsy rate compared to standard mammography

But patients may still opt for it

Study finds 3D simulation doesn't improve breast augmentation outcomes

by Lauren Dubinsky , Senior Reporter
Many women opt for 3D image simulation to plan their breast augmentation surgery, but does it actually make a difference? A new study published in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery found that it doesn’t.

“Essentially, the 3D simulation is an effective visual communicator, and a visual depiction of a surgical outcome is more informative we think, than saying ‘C cup,’ ‘D cup,’ ‘much larger’ or ‘a little larger,’” Dr. Terence Myckatyn of the Washington University School of Medicine, told HCB News. “Also, it provides a pretty accurate facsimile of how things will look — good or bad.”

Story Continues Below Advertisement

Servicing GE Nuclear Medicine equipment with OEM trained engineers

We offer full service contracts, PM contracts, rapid response, time and material,camera relocation. Nuclear medicine equipment service provider since 1975. Click or call now for more information 800 96 NUMED

For this technique, the surgeon uses digital photos and imaging software to generate a 3D simulation of what the patient’s breasts will look like after surgery. But since surgeons already achieve excellent cosmetic results with conventional tissue planning techniques, 3D image simulation might not be necessary.

For the study, Myckatyn and his team evaluated 23 women &mdash 10 were randomly assigned to receive 3D simulation and 13 to receive tissue-based planning. However, after the first few months all of the women wanted 3D simulation, presumably due to an increase in awareness from the internet and word of mouth.

The patients filled out a standard questionnaire called the BREAST-Q to evaluate their satisfaction level and various domains of quality of life. The researchers also obtained a detailed set of mammometric measurements to evaluate objective results.

The questionnaire revealed that breast augmentation led to significant improvements in satisfaction with breasts, sexual well-being and psychosocial outcomes. But the use of 3D simulation didn’t appear to contribute to these positive outcomes.

In addition, the mammometric measurements were comparable between the two groups. There was also no significant difference in the volume of implants chosen by women who received 3D simulation from those who received tissue-based planning.

Myckatyn did not investigate why 3D simulation appears to have no effect on patient outcomes, but he speculates that a concept called post-decisional dissonance could be the reason. That concept involves the patient convincing themselves that the decision they made was the right one.

Another reason would be the fact that the BREAST-Q questionnaire isn’t sensitive enough to pick up modest differences between patients. It might not be able to distinguish patients who are "very happy" from those who are "extremely happy".

“It should be noted, though, that while 3D simulation may not have improved patient reported outcomes in our study, there was little doubt that when patients knew they had access to this technology, they were likely to seek it out,” Myckatyn concluded. “Certainly we have had many patients who sought out practices, such as ours, because we have this technology.”

Women's Health Homepage

You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment

Increase Your
Brand Awareness
Auctions + Private Sales
Get The
Best Price
Buy Equipment/Parts
Find The
Lowest Price
Daily News
Read The
Latest News
Browse All
DOTmed Users
Ethics on DOTmed
View Our
Ethics Program
Gold Parts Vendor Program
Receive PH
Gold Service Dealer Program
Receive RFP/PS
Healthcare Providers
See all
HCP Tools
A Job
Parts Hunter +EasyPay
Get Parts
Recently Certified
View Recently
Certified Users
Recently Rated
View Recently
Certified Users
Rental Central
Rent Equipment
For Less
Sell Equipment/Parts
Get The
Most Money
Service Technicians Forum
Find Help
And Advice
Simple RFP
Get Equipment
Virtual Trade Show
Find Service
For Equipment
Access and use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions of our LEGAL NOTICE & PRIVACY NOTICE
Property of and Proprietary to, Inc. Copyright ©2001-2019, Inc.