The study, however, did identify a dip in the reporting of such events, with 170 submitted in 2009 and 104 in 2017, a possible reflection of greater focus in attention and resources on MR screening. Field says that greater transparency of device safety, backed by more focused attention and policy making around MR procedures, is essential to preventing the occurrence of screening and adverse MR events.

“The increasing number and variety of internal medical devices, non-medical objects, and medical equipment makes determination of MR compatibility an ongoing challenge,” said Field. “Development and implementation of thoughtful policies are important to support continued enforcement of MR safety protocols. Careful and conscientious attention to MR screening can prevent injuries and save lives.”


The study was limited due to the data submitted through the PA-PSRS being subject to individual and facility reporting practices, which vary in quality and quantity of narrative details, frequency in reporting and designation of harmful scores. Other limitations included analysts use of search terms specific to MR screening; the need to interpret narrative details to categorize the zone of the event; and event descriptions not always including enough details to determine the outcomes for events “reaching” the patient, such as in the case of delayed diagnoses; further imaging, increased length of stay, or additional healthcare costs.

The findings were published in the journal Advisory.

Back to HCB News

MRI Homepage