DOTmed Home MRI Oncology Ultrasound Molecular Imaging X-Ray Cardiology Health IT Business Affairs
News Home Parts & Service Operating Room CT Women's Health Proton Therapy Endoscopy HTMs Mobile Imaging
Current Location:
> This Story

Log in or Register to rate this News Story
Forward Printable StoryPrint Comment




More Industry Headlines

Total-body PET scanner produces landmark human images First ever simultaneously captured 3-D image of the entire human body

The new face of Congress: How the midterm elections will reshape the healthcare legislation landscape

South African NTP Radioisotopes facility re-opens following year-long closure Will help alleviate worldwide shortages of Mo-99 and other isotopes

Google to reabsorb AI enterprise, DeepMind Will make its Stream app an AI assistant for doctors and nurses

Medical charities do measurable good in the world A look at some organizations bringing goods and services where they are needed most

High-deductible plans stressing patient imaging utilization, payments Addressing the misleading cost information available online

CT colonography potentially less expensive than optical colonoscopy: study Found to save between 22 and 50 percent in costs

Rad rooms get more complex while detectors lighten up A look around the industry at the latest radiology tools entering the market

Merit Medical Systems closes acquisition of Cianna Medical Deal worth $135 million with possible additional incentivized payments

TIAA Bank acquires $1.5 billion portfolio from GE Capital's HEF business Portfolio of healthcare equipment leases and loans

Dave Fisher,
executive director of MITA

MITA says super committee's proposed imaging cuts threaten technology, patients

by Diana Bradley , Staff Writer
In the run up to the Nov. 23 deficit reduction deadline, the Medical Imaging & Technology Alliance, a lobby for medical imaging equipment manufactures, is concerned about repercussions from the congressional "super committee's" proposed medical imaging cuts.

Although $1.2 - 1.5 trillion must be sliced off the national budget, this would be the eighth instance in six years that medical imaging funds have felt the chop. Reimbursements for many imaging procedures have substantially deteriorated over the years, according to Dave Fisher, executive director of MITA. And this is not only affecting the medical imaging technology industry, but also the patients.

Story Continues Below Advertisement


Special-Pricing Available on Medical Displays, Patient Monitors, Recorders, Printers, Media, Ultrasound Machines, and Cameras.This includes Top Brands such as SONY, BARCO, NDS, NEC, LG, EDAN, EIZO, ELO, FSN, PANASONIC, MITSUBISHI, OLYMPUS, & WIDE.

"Because imaging reimbursements have declined precipitously, the market for imaging products has also declined and as a result, new technologies are not reaching patients as quickly as they could," said Fisher. "Medical imaging is now one of the slowest growing components of the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule."

Medical imaging developments "changed the face of clinical medicine" during the last millennium, reported The New England Journal of Medicine. However, 2009 marked the first drop in Medicare advanced imaging volumes in eleven years, according to a recent report released by the Access to Medical Imaging Coalition and conducted by The Moran Group. In that same time period, Medicare spending on advanced imaging increased by 1.2 percent, compared with a 2.6 percent growth for all Medicare physician-provided services. The report noted that a 0.1 percent drop in volumes for advanced procedures is coupled with a 7.1 percent volume decline for all imaging -- this is due, in part, to cuts.

Medical imaging cuts threaten access to early detection of cancers and heart disease, taking the devices away from physicians who depend on them to diagnose and treat patients. Furthermore, the medical imaging industry's life-saving technologies support thousands of middle-class American jobs, according to a Powell Tate press release. These jobs could be negatively impacted by the proposed cuts.

In light of these downward trends, current law assumes advanced diagnostic imaging equipment is utilized 75 percent of the workweek, with payments priced accordingly. The proposal's aim is to reduce Medicare payments by increasing this assumption to 80 percent in 2012 and 90 percent in 2013. Fisher believes the super committee's logic lies with recalling growth rates in imaging reimbursements from the early part of the last decade.

"Policymakers are not factoring in flat or declining growth rates in recent years," he said.

Countless advocates agree that ramifications for these medical imaging cuts are daunting, including 22 patient and provider groups and ten members of Congress.

"We are already seeing changes in the medical imaging marketplace," said Fisher. "Additional cuts will only exacerbate that problem."


You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment

Increase Your
Brand Awareness
Auctions + Private Sales
Get The
Best Price
Buy Equipment/Parts
Find The
Lowest Price
Daily News
Read The
Latest News
Browse All
DOTmed Users
Ethics on DOTmed
View Our
Ethics Program
Gold Parts Vendor Program
Receive PH
Gold Service Dealer Program
Receive RFP/PS
Healthcare Providers
See all
HCP Tools
A Job
Parts Hunter +EasyPay
Get Parts
Recently Certified
View Recently
Certified Users
Recently Rated
View Recently
Certified Users
Rental Central
Rent Equipment
For Less
Sell Equipment/Parts
Get The
Most Money
Service Technicians Forum
Find Help
And Advice
Simple RFP
Get Equipment
Virtual Trade Show
Find Service
For Equipment
Access and use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions of our LEGAL NOTICE & PRIVACY NOTICE
Property of and Proprietary to, Inc. Copyright ©2001-2018, Inc.