This Thursday, Jan 25th is our next Clean Sweep Live Auction: Click to view the full catalogue and pre-bid now

DOTmed Home MRI Oncology Ultrasound Molecular Imaging X-Ray Cardiology Health IT Business Affairs
News Home Parts & Service Operating Room CT Women's Health Proton Therapy Endoscopy HTMs Mobile Imaging
Current Location:
> This Story

Log in or Register to rate this News Story
Forward Printable StoryPrint Comment



MRI Homepage

Researchers develop PET tracer that can measure damage caused by MS Offers advantages not found with conventional MR

CMS may reimburse MR with cardiac implants beyond 'MR-friendly' Shift attributed to mounting evidence of scan safety

Engineering solution reduces MR production and scanning costs Could cut cost of MR analysis in half

FDA gives nod to MR-conditional labeling for Abbott ICD and CRT-D Labeling will reduce anxiety for patients who need scanning

New technique may pave way toward much lower-cost MR technology Eliminates need for superconducting magnets

Asia-Pacific imaging market to grow at a CAGR of 10 percent through 2021 Technological advancement is one of the main drivers

MR replaces biopsy in kidney cancer assessment Involves multiparametric MR protocols

The five biggest MR stories of 2017 Ultrahigh-powered magnets, a new gold standard in radiotherapy and the Chuck Norris effect on gadolinium

Older pacemakers still safe in MR New findings suggest CMS should change policy to cover these scans

Anatomage launches Anatomage Cloud for medical image sharing Response to rising number of specialists using cone beam CT imaging

Michigan appeals court case could test lay-ownership of MR facility laws

by Thomas Dworetzky , Contributing Reporter
A Michigan MR facility that is for-profit and its non-physician owner are in court, in a case that brings the question of physician-only ownership to the legal forefront.

Late last year Judge Daniel O'Brien of Oakland County Circuit Court made a determination that Oakland MRI could be run as an LLC and that owner Susan Swider did not, in fact, have to be a doctor.

Story Continues Below Advertisement

CT, MRI, NM, SPECT/CT, PET & PET/CT service, refurbished systems and parts

Accelerate your ROI with our Black Diamond Certified refurbished systems. One year warranty - ISO 13485 Certified - FDA registered - Over 65k parts in inventory

But that ruling was met with disagreement in both the health care and legal arenas.

"If you are a lay, for-profit corporation, you cannot employ physicians to furnish medical services," Mark Kopson, chair of the health care practice at Plunkett Cooney in Bloomfield Hills told Crain's Detroit Business. "The public policy behind the prohibition against the corporate practice of medicine is to prevent profit motives of for-profit corporations from affecting how medical care is delivered."

The case is now in the Appeals Court.

The case, which could be heard this year or early in 2018, would provide an opportunity for the appeals court to state that lay ownership is legal if real doctors perform medical services.

Kopson noted such a ruling could represent "a de facto acknowledgment of changes in the health care industry over the past 40 years."

When the appeal was launched in January, attorney Christine Derdarian, on behalf of the Michigan Radiological Society, stated that, "the trial court failed to reference the correct statutes and erred in its conclusion, an interpretation that resulted in a clear abuse of discretion."

The problem, which is “nationwide,” she advised, is that ownership is not considered when granting a Certificate of Need (CON). "It determines whether there is a market need, do they have proper equipment and the location for the service."

Oakland MRI's lawyer Chris Cataldo, of Jaffe Raitt Heuer & Weiss, argued that the facility was formed legally.

"The court ruled with us," he explained to Crain's. "The statutes are crystal clear on corporate practice, and we are right. If they don't like it, they should be talking with the Legislature seeking to change state law or taking it up with the CON Commission, not with my client."

Crain's estimates that there could be 500 lay-owned medical companies in Michigan alone. This number suggests that a ruling against the facility might lead to significant legal changes in Michigan – and perhaps throughout the country.

Back to HCB News
  Pages: 1

MRI Homepage

You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment

Increase Your
Brand Awareness
Auctions + Private Sales
Get The
Best Price
Buy Equipment/Parts
Find The
Lowest Price
Daily News
Read The
Latest News
Browse All
DOTmed Users
Ethics on DOTmed
View Our
Ethics Program
Gold Parts Vendor Program
Receive PH
Gold Service Dealer Program
Receive RFP/PS
Healthcare Providers
See all
HCP Tools
A Job
Parts Hunter +EasyPay
Get Parts
Recently Certified
View Recently
Certified Users
Recently Rated
View Recently
Certified Users
Rental Central
Rent Equipment
For Less
Sell Equipment/Parts
Get The
Most Money
Service Technicians Forum
Find Help
And Advice
Simple RFP
Get Equipment
Virtual Trade Show
Find Service
For Equipment
Access and use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions of our LEGAL NOTICE & PRIVACY NOTICE
Property of and Proprietary to DOTmed.com, Inc. Copyright ©2001-2018 DOTmed.com, Inc.