This Thursday, Jan 25th is our next Clean Sweep Live Auction: Click to view the full catalogue and pre-bid now

DOTmed Home MRI Oncology Ultrasound Molecular Imaging X-Ray Cardiology Health IT Business Affairs
News Home Parts & Service Operating Room CT Women's Health Proton Therapy Endoscopy HTMs Mobile Imaging
Current Location:
> This Story

Log in or Register to rate this News Story
Forward Printable StoryPrint Comment



More Industry Headlines

Does health care hold the key to IBM's market comeback? With stock values a mere shadow of their former glory, Big Blue seeks redemption in health IT

Medical device industry praises Congressional delay of medical device tax Suspended for another two years

Securing your health data in 2018 Should your patients trust you with their data?

EMR default prescription setting could help curb the U.S. opioid crisis 30 tablets are often given when only 10-12 are needed

One-of-a-kind TTE cardiac imaging probe invented to better train cardiologists A safe and realistic simulator

Higher breast cancer screening rates seen after copayments were eliminated, research shows ACA opposition could threaten these trends

Health care’s paperwork problem: sacrificing patients for paperwork Pediatricians are among the biggest victims of excessive paperwork

Canon to step up payoff of Toshiba Medical deal debt Setting aside $1.79 billion to double its repayments in 2018

Change Healthcare acquires NDSC Enables delivery of medical guidelines through EHRs to the point of care

Donald Trump had a CT scan, here's what we learned President deemed healthy, despite presence of heart disease

Could save firms millions

FDA proposing new fast track for medical device approval

by Thomas Dworetzky , Contributing Reporter
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is proposing a “fast track” for certain medical devices, as well as cuts to the safety data needed for agency approval.

It is the agency's “intention to propose an alternate approach to the traditional 510(k) clearance process, which will involve the use of modern, science-based, consensus standards and FDA-developed performance criteria as the comparator for device review for certain well-understood technologies,” FDA commissioner Dr. Scott Gottlieb wrote in the official FDA blog.

Story Continues Below Advertisement

OR Tables, Treatment/GYN/Uro Chairs, Transport Stretchers, Hospital/ICU Bed

iMS combines the superior service of Oakworks Medical and advanced manufacturing technology of FAMED Medical Solutions. The goal of iMS, "Connecting Art and Medical Science" goes way beyond product with exceptional CareLink service. Contact us today!

At present, he pointed out, the agency compares new devices to prior ones, called predicates, that can be as much as 40 years old. In order for a new device to gain 510(k) clearance it must have moderate risk and be “substantially equivalent” to one that already exists.

Basically, the new alternative to predicates makes them replaceable by a different approach that uses benchmarks of performance standards and guidance documents — the plan, according to Reuters, would be voluntary.

“Today, in new draft guidance on the Least Burdensome Provisions, FDA defines least burdensome to be the 'minimum amount of information necessary to adequately address a regulatory question or issue through the most efficient manner at the right time.' The new draft guidance also explains FDA’s regulatory approach and delineates guiding principles that we propose to apply across the total product life cycle — beyond what Congress has required — including all device-related applications and interactions with the medical device industry,” Gottlieb wrote in the agency blog post.

The alternative path could save firms millions of dollars and save substantial time in bringing new products to market.

The approach also supports President Trump's call to slash regulations and has garnered support from makers.

Industry group AdvaMed “commends FDA’s commitment to promoting patient access to medical technologies through innovative regulatory pathways,” its spokeswoman Janet Trunzo told Reuters.

Gottlieb also addressed the issue of high-risk products and stated that the agency would look to speed up their approval as well — and plans to issue new guidance that will lay out “how certain issues could be ultimately resolved in the postmarket setting, rather than the premarket setting, to allow patients to gain faster access to potentially lifesaving devices.”

Dr. Rita Redberg, a cardiologist at the University of California San Francisco and editor of JAMA Internal Medicine, raised concerns to the news agency, however, arguing that the moves could put safety issues from premarket to postmarket — and possibly risk patients' health.

“When we use devices on patients without clinical studies first, the patients effectively become the trial and the insurers become the funder of the device trial,” she advised.

Others in the health care community also chimed in about the potential easing of premarket testing.

“I see a potentially huge problem in moving more risk to the post-approval setting,” said Areta Kupchyk, a partner at Foley Hoag and former associate chief counsel at the FDA. “It’s very difficult once a product has been approved to pull it back.”


You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment

Increase Your
Brand Awareness
Auctions + Private Sales
Get The
Best Price
Buy Equipment/Parts
Find The
Lowest Price
Daily News
Read The
Latest News
Browse All
DOTmed Users
Ethics on DOTmed
View Our
Ethics Program
Gold Parts Vendor Program
Receive PH
Gold Service Dealer Program
Receive RFP/PS
Healthcare Providers
See all
HCP Tools
A Job
Parts Hunter +EasyPay
Get Parts
Recently Certified
View Recently
Certified Users
Recently Rated
View Recently
Certified Users
Rental Central
Rent Equipment
For Less
Sell Equipment/Parts
Get The
Most Money
Service Technicians Forum
Find Help
And Advice
Simple RFP
Get Equipment
Virtual Trade Show
Find Service
For Equipment
Access and use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions of our LEGAL NOTICE & PRIVACY NOTICE
Property of and Proprietary to DOTmed.com, Inc. Copyright ©2001-2018 DOTmed.com, Inc.