dismiss

Clean Sweep Live Auction on Thur. March 28th. Click to view the full inventory

DOTmed Home MRI Oncology Ultrasound Molecular Imaging X-Ray Cardiology Health IT Business Affairs
News Home Parts & Service Operating Room CT Women's Health Proton Therapy Endoscopy HTMs Mobile Imaging
SEARCH
Current Location:
>
> This Story


Log in or Register to rate this News Story
Forward Printable StoryPrint Comment
advertisement

 

 

X-Ray Homepage

3D mammography helps avoid unnecessary breast biopsies, says study 33 percent difference in biopsy rate compared to standard mammography

New approach identifies lung cancer patients most likely to respond to chemotherapy Combines radiomics and CT image assessment

National Mobile X-ray acquires MMDS Mobile X-ray Expands reach deeper in southeastern US

BSWH to install Glassbeam's CLEAN blueprint to leverage machine uptime Will include integrated CMMS software by EQ2

Level Ex releases interventional cardiac video game, Cardio Ex Over 35 levels that test cognitive, spatial reasoning and decision-making skills

Machine learning reduces false positives for lung cancer in low-dose CT False positives occur at rate of 96 percent

Siemens to unveil its SOMATOM go.Top Cardiovascular Edition CT at ACC 19 Ideal for the cardiovascular outpatient setting

Varex Imaging and H+P Advanced Technology to build carbon nanotube company Expect to see products come out in two-to-three years

Hitachi unveils new CT and ultrasound solutions at ECR Standard version of SCENARIA VIEW and three new Arietta ultrasound solutions

Canon showcases CT image reconstruction tech and software upgrade at ECR Removing noise while preserving signals

Radiologists trail only primary care in number of diagnosis-related lawsuits

by John W. Mitchell , Senior Correspondent
A recently released medical claims data report found that 80 percent of radiology malpractice claims involve the misinterpretation of a "clinical test."

Further, about 28 percent of the radiology claims involve a death, while about 46 percent involve a "grave," "permanent significant" or “permanent” injury. The Red Signal Report was released recently by Coverys, a medical and liability insurance company.

Story Continues Below Advertisement

RaySafe helps you avoid unnecessary radiation

RaySafe solutions are designed to minimize the need for user interaction, bringing unprecedented simplicity & usability to the X-ray room. We're committed to establishing a radiation safety culture wherever technicians & medical staff encounter radiation.



“Errors in radiology are unfortunately common. These errors have severe and life-threatening effects on patients,” said Robert Hanscom, vice president of business analytics at Coverys. “We developed this report to illuminate warning signs and safety vulnerabilities within radiology practices, in the hope of educating providers and risk managers — ultimately improving patient safety.”

Roughly 15 percent of malpractice claims with a diagnosis-related allegation involve a radiologist, second only to general medicine providers, added Hanscom. Over 80 percent of claims are most often associated with a missed interpretation. The largest number of cases involve a missed or delayed diagnosis, especially related to cases of cancer.

Incidental findings "continue to be a major problem," according to Hanscom. While radiologists feel they are doing their jobs when reporting an incidental finding to an ordering specialist, the primary care doctor also needs to be notified. The report also found that lengthy radiology reports of the past "need to be made obsolete," replaced by standardized report templates, to help reduce variability in interpretation. Second reads on complex or critical cases are also recommended.

Hanscom also recommended that radiologists and risk managers pose four questions to assess if they have good risk protocols in place. These include:

  • Is there a closed-loop tracking system or process in place to identify outstanding test results and follow-up studies?

  • Is there a process for communicating test results during transitions of care between the inpatient and outpatient setting?

  • Are electronic health records with alert-based notification systems sending abnormal test results to both the ordering provider and primary care provider?

  • Are there criteria and processes in place to address the need to escalate and communicate the urgency of performing a recommended imaging study or intervention?

X-Ray Homepage


You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment

Advertise
Increase Your
Brand Awareness
Auctions + Private Sales
Get The
Best Price
Buy Equipment/Parts
Find The
Lowest Price
Daily News
Read The
Latest News
Directory
Browse All
DOTmed Users
Ethics on DOTmed
View Our
Ethics Program
Gold Parts Vendor Program
Receive PH
Requests
Gold Service Dealer Program
Receive RFP/PS
Requests
Healthcare Providers
See all
HCP Tools
Jobs/Training
Find/Fill
A Job
Parts Hunter +EasyPay
Get Parts
Quotes
Recently Certified
View Recently
Certified Users
Recently Rated
View Recently
Certified Users
Rental Central
Rent Equipment
For Less
Sell Equipment/Parts
Get The
Most Money
Service Technicians Forum
Find Help
And Advice
Simple RFP
Get Equipment
Quotes
Virtual Trade Show
Find Service
For Equipment
Access and use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions of our LEGAL NOTICE & PRIVACY NOTICE
Property of and Proprietary to DOTmed.com, Inc. Copyright ©2001-2019 DOTmed.com, Inc.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED