DOTmed Home MRI Oncology Ultrasound Molecular Imaging X-Ray Cardiology Health IT Business Affairs
News Home Parts & Service Operating Room CT Women's Health Proton Therapy Endoscopy HTMs Mobile Imaging
SEARCH
Current Location:
>
> This Story


Log in or Register to rate this News Story
Forward Printable StoryPrint Comment
advertisement

 

advertisement

 

CT Homepage

Hitachi unveils new CT scanner, Scenaria View 128, at RSNA Provides better workflow with SynergyDrive and large, 80 cm aperture

Spectrum Dynamics files lawsuit against GE Alleges theft of intellectual property regarding VERITON-CT

MaxQ AI rolling out machine learning application for intercranial hemorrhage Part of a 'three-pronged' platform to improve stroke treatment

University of Utah Health among first to leverage Philips Illumeo PACS with adaptive intelligence On display at RSNA

Siemens unveils syngo Virtual Cockpit software for CT, MR and PET at RSNA Offers remote expert technicians when needed

Glassbeam partners with EQ2 and RENOVO Extending reach to CMMS users; increasing uptime of ultrasound

FDA clears Icometrix's CT assessment tool for traumatic brain injuries Toward standardized interpretation of acute non-contrast scans

Five hot topics when managing lung screening program data These insights will help you avoid mistakes and get your program right the first time

CT colonography potentially less expensive than optical colonoscopy: study Found to save between 22 and 50 percent in costs

Why settle for less when you can have more with spectral CT? Dr. Amit Gupta describes the benefits that dual-energy spectral CT brings to radiology

Many fear an EPA proposed rule change
could weaken regulations around
radiation exposure

Could proposed EPA rule change lead to less stringent radiation exposure regulations?

by John R. Fischer , Staff Reporter
The Environmental Protection Agency has caused a commotion in the medical imaging community over proposed rule changes that some perceive as leading toward a weakening of regulations around radiation exposure.

The government agency is questioning current, decades-old guidelines based on the notion that any exposure to radiation places individuals at greater risk of developing cancer in their lifetime. The argument to revisit these guidelines is based on scientific outliers claiming that exposure to small doses of radiation can actually be good for humans.

Story Continues Below Advertisement

Dunlee announces the relaunch of DA135 CT/e, DA165NP and Akron tubes

Dunlee announces the return of the DA135 CT/e, DA165NP, S532B and S532Q(known as the Akron tubes) CT Replacement tubes, making its full portfolio of CT tubes for GE and Siemens CT scanners available once again.Click to learn more



The EPA's suggestion has been met with condemnation from numerous individuals and organizations that fear alterations may place medical workers as well as nuclear workers and others at risk of exposure to larger amounts in their environment.

“The American Society of Radiologic Technologists is committed to optimal patient care that includes a focus on protection from unnecessary medical radiation,” Greg Morrison, ASRT associate executive director, told HCB News. “We strongly oppose any measure that would weaken radiation protection measures for patients, radiologic technologists and all other healthcare workers.”

Medical and scientific communities currently operate under the linear no-threshold model, which claims that no threshold of risk-free radiation exposure exists. Supporters of the proposal claim the model is flawed and has led to unnecessary spending for managing exposure in accidents, at nuclear plants, in medical facilities and at other sites.

First introduced in April, the Strengthening Transparency in Regulatory Science proposal directs regulators to consider alternative scientific viewpoints when establishing or adhering to regulatory standards, including evaluating various threshold models across the range of exposures when in contact with dangerous substances.

Though it does not specifically mention radiation, many interpret its wording to include radiation protection standards. Edward Calabrese, a toxologist at the University of Massachusetts who supports the proposal, has called it “a major scientific step forward” that would save billions and have a positive impact on human health.

Echoing this sentiment was Brant Ulsh, a physicist with the California-based consulting firm M.H. Chew and Associates. “Right now we spend an enormous effort trying to minimize low doses” he told the Associated Press. “Instead, let’s spend the resources on minimizing the effect of a really big event.”
  Pages: 1 - 2 - 3 >>

CT Homepage


You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment

Advertise
Increase Your
Brand Awareness
Auctions + Private Sales
Get The
Best Price
Buy Equipment/Parts
Find The
Lowest Price
Daily News
Read The
Latest News
Directory
Browse All
DOTmed Users
Ethics on DOTmed
View Our
Ethics Program
Gold Parts Vendor Program
Receive PH
Requests
Gold Service Dealer Program
Receive RFP/PS
Requests
Healthcare Providers
See all
HCP Tools
Jobs/Training
Find/Fill
A Job
Parts Hunter +EasyPay
Get Parts
Quotes
Recently Certified
View Recently
Certified Users
Recently Rated
View Recently
Certified Users
Rental Central
Rent Equipment
For Less
Sell Equipment/Parts
Get The
Most Money
Service Technicians Forum
Find Help
And Advice
Simple RFP
Get Equipment
Quotes
Virtual Trade Show
Find Service
For Equipment
Access and use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions of our LEGAL NOTICE & PRIVACY NOTICE
Property of and Proprietary to DOTmed.com, Inc. Copyright ©2001-2018 DOTmed.com, Inc.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED