dismiss

Clean Sweep Live Auction on Wed. May 1st. Click to view the full inventory

DOTmed Home MRI Oncology Ultrasound Molecular Imaging X-Ray Cardiology Health IT Business Affairs
News Home Parts & Service Operating Room CT Women's Health Proton Therapy Endoscopy HTMs Pediatrics
SEARCH
Current Location:
>
> This Story


Log in or Register to rate this News Story
Forward Printable StoryPrint Comment
advertisement

 

advertisement

 

Rad Oncology Homepage

Fivefold difference found in Medicaid reimbursements for radiotherapy May limit access to healthcare, especially in rural areas

Trends in radiation oncology workforce potentially threaten rural patients, says study More radiation oncologists leaving, fewer coming in to rural areas

Varian showcases first preclinical findings of Flash therapy trial Reductions in radiation lung fibrosis and dermatitis

Female oncologists submit fewer charges, paid less than male Study bases findings on Medicare records

Four considerations before embarking on a carbon therapy center The next frontier in improving cancer care

New approach identifies lung cancer patients most likely to respond to chemotherapy Combines radiomics and CT image assessment

Q&A with Scott Warwick, executive director of the National Association for Proton Therapy Find out what to expect at the year's biggest proton therapy industry event

Aussies and Americans develop 3D models for assessing impacts of radiotherapy Test different levels and types of radiation

Law in Ontario prevents cremation of brachytherapy patients Experts call for eliminating the law, as it deters patients from lifesaving treatment

IBA tech plays first-time role in flash therapy demonstration Supports eventual integration of flash as clinical treatment

CMS plans to implement an alternative
mandatory payment model for radiation
oncology

CMS to unveil mandatory payment model for radiation oncology

by John R. Fischer , Staff Reporter
In the next few weeks, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) plans to implement an alternative mandatory payment model for radiation oncology.

The idea for the new model, announced this week, ties in with the government's assessment of bundled payments rather than separate ones for individual services and procedures, and partially stems from the success of the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement model (BPCI) in several common inpatient episodes, including joint replacement and pneumonia. HHS' recently launched version, BPCI Advanced, currently consists of more than 1,000 participants that are receiving episode-based payments for over 30 clinical areas.

Story Continues Below Advertisement

Servicing GE Nuclear Medicine equipment with OEM trained engineers

We offer full service contracts, PM contracts, rapid response, time and material,camera relocation. Nuclear medicine equipment service provider since 1975. Click or call now for more information 800 96 NUMED



Though participation is voluntary, Secretary of Health and Human Services Alex Azar says the implementation of a mandatory model is essential for determining which approach provides the most savings and greatest quality of care.

“Real experimentation with episodic bundles requires a willingness to try mandatory models,” he said Thursday in a speech at the Patient-Centered Primary Care Collaborative conference in Washington, D.C. “We know they are the most effective way to know whether these bundles can successfully save money and improve quality.”

Such experimentation is part an aim to create a simplified system that tamps down regulations, such as staffing ratio requirements and the burdensome task of individually reimbursing for each procedure or prescription, and focus more on pursuing optimal outcomes, with HHS planning to work with a variety of stakeholders to achieve these objectives. It has already started with the recent launch of a mandatory Medicare Part B model that seeks to reduce spending on drugs issued in hospitals and doctor's offices, and align U.S. payments for pharmaceuticals with those of other countries.

Though a majority of oncologists advocate for an alternative payment model, particularly due to the shift toward value-based care, many oppose the establishment of mandatory ones, seeing them as downside risks that subject Medicare patients to untested approaches with unknown results following treatment, all for the sake of lowering healthcare costs. They also argue that such models lack enough evidence to prove their worth.

While expressing its concern over this detail, the American Society for Radiation Oncology applauded Azar and CMS for the development of a radiation oncology alternative payment model (RO-APM), offering its expertise and support in the creation and implementation of one.
  Pages: 1 - 2 >>

Rad Oncology Homepage


You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment

Advertise
Increase Your
Brand Awareness
Auctions + Private Sales
Get The
Best Price
Buy Equipment/Parts
Find The
Lowest Price
Daily News
Read The
Latest News
Directory
Browse All
DOTmed Users
Ethics on DOTmed
View Our
Ethics Program
Gold Parts Vendor Program
Receive PH
Requests
Gold Service Dealer Program
Receive RFP/PS
Requests
Healthcare Providers
See all
HCP Tools
Jobs/Training
Find/Fill
A Job
Parts Hunter +EasyPay
Get Parts
Quotes
Recently Certified
View Recently
Certified Users
Recently Rated
View Recently
Certified Users
Rental Central
Rent Equipment
For Less
Sell Equipment/Parts
Get The
Most Money
Service Technicians Forum
Find Help
And Advice
Simple RFP
Get Equipment
Quotes
Virtual Trade Show
Find Service
For Equipment
Access and use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions of our LEGAL NOTICE & PRIVACY NOTICE
Property of and Proprietary to DOTmed.com, Inc. Copyright ©2001-2019 DOTmed.com, Inc.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED