dismiss

Clean Sweep Live Auction on Wed. February 27th. Click to view the full inventory

DOTmed Home MRI Oncology Ultrasound Molecular Imaging X-Ray Cardiology Health IT Business Affairs
News Home Parts & Service Operating Room CT Women's Health Proton Therapy Endoscopy HTMs Mobile Imaging
SEARCH
Current Location:
>
> This Story


Log in or Register to rate this News Story
Forward Printable StoryPrint Comment
advertisement

 

advertisement

 

Rad Oncology Homepage

Canon adds radiation oncology functioning to Aquilion CTs Can be shared between radiology and radiation oncology departments

Philips and MIM Software collab to streamline radiotherapy treatment planning Integrate portfolios of CT, MR and software solutions

ZAP Surgical launches radiosurgery platform for treating brain tumors Lowers cost of SRS with self-shielding technology

First Southeast Asian proton therapy center opens in India Will treat more than 3 million Indians with cancer, and other SE Asian populations

FDA clears MIM SurePlan molecular radiotherapy software Can measure the absorbed dose from MRT for individual patients

Addressing the radiation-related cancer risk of obese patients A complex problem and a call for better dose optimization

Mevion to install PT system at Mercy Hospital St. Louis Equipped with HYPERSCAN technology

GE and VUMC partner to make cancer immunotherapy safer and more precise Five-year collab will yield new AI apps and PET tracers

Proton therapy pioneer James M. Slater dies at 89 Oversaw creation of the world's first proton treatment center

UK and US researchers develop AI models for evaluating emotional burden of cancer More clearly assesses reduction in quality of life

An Oklahoma court has awarded
more than $25,000 to the family of
a cancer patient who died after her
insurance provider wouldn't cover her
proton beam therapy

Patient denied proton therapy dies, family received $25 million in court

by John R. Fischer , Staff Reporter
An Oklahoma court has awarded more than $25 million to the family of a cancer patient who died after being denied coverage by her insurance provider for proton beam therapy (PBT), despite its recommendation by her physicians.

The case surrounding the death of Orrana Cunningham, who was diagnosed with stage 4 nasopharyngeal cancer near her brain stem, has stirred conversation around proton therapy coverage for patients with certain forms of cancer.

Story Continues Below Advertisement

Servicing GE Nuclear Medicine equipment with OEM trained engineers

We offer full service contracts, PM contracts, rapid response, time and material,camera relocation. Nuclear medicine equipment service provider since 1975. Click or call now for more information 800 96 NUMED



“Nasopharyngeal cancer is a good example of a rare form of cancer which may be better treated with proton beam therapy and without resulting in harmful side effects,” Professor Karol Sikora, chief medical officer at the Rutherford Cancer Centre South Wales, which just this year became the first clinic in the U.K. to provide high energy PBT, said in a statement.

Cunningham was recommended in 2014 to undergo PBT by her doctors, who saw the treatment as more effective than radiotherapy for treating the form of cancer she had, compared to radiotherapy, due to its ability to target and eliminate tumors with a minimal damage to surrounding healthy tissue, thereby creating a lower risk for incurring harmful side effects.

Her insurance provider, however, refused to cover the cost, viewing the treatment as “experimental”. Cunningham and her husband attempted to raise funds for the procedure themselves but Cunningham died before they could, in May 2015.

Based on testimonies from proton and radiation-oncology experts, the jury determined proton therapy not to be an experimental treatment, but one that has been verified as efficient and was medically necessary for Cunningham.

Despite being used for decades throughout the U.S., proton therapy is relatively new, with the first center dedicated to its use opening in the early 2000s. Since then, 26 centers have opened up throughout the country but are still limited in providing such treatment to patients due to insurance providers not willing to cover the medical expenses involved with it, based on a lack of understanding around its use.

This lack of awareness also expands outside the medical field, a recent example being Tennessee Governor Bill Haslam’s (R.) decision to veto a bill that would have made coverage for proton therapy mandatory under state employee insurance plans.

Dr. Justin E. Bekelman says refusals of coverage such as this are harmful not just in clinical settings but in trials as well, preventing patients from participating in randomized studies that could potentially generate greater awareness of the benefits of such procedures.

“While coverage policy is an important tool that can reduce inappropriate use of medical technologies, it can also create barriers to evidence development,” Bekelman, an associate professor of Radiation Oncology and Medical Ethics and Health Policy and senior fellow at the Leonard Davis Institute for Health Economics at the University of Pennsylvania’s Perelman School of Medicine, told HCB News in an op-ed.

Rad Oncology Homepage


You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment

Advertise
Increase Your
Brand Awareness
Auctions + Private Sales
Get The
Best Price
Buy Equipment/Parts
Find The
Lowest Price
Daily News
Read The
Latest News
Directory
Browse All
DOTmed Users
Ethics on DOTmed
View Our
Ethics Program
Gold Parts Vendor Program
Receive PH
Requests
Gold Service Dealer Program
Receive RFP/PS
Requests
Healthcare Providers
See all
HCP Tools
Jobs/Training
Find/Fill
A Job
Parts Hunter +EasyPay
Get Parts
Quotes
Recently Certified
View Recently
Certified Users
Recently Rated
View Recently
Certified Users
Rental Central
Rent Equipment
For Less
Sell Equipment/Parts
Get The
Most Money
Service Technicians Forum
Find Help
And Advice
Simple RFP
Get Equipment
Quotes
Virtual Trade Show
Find Service
For Equipment
Access and use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions of our LEGAL NOTICE & PRIVACY NOTICE
Property of and Proprietary to DOTmed.com, Inc. Copyright ©2001-2019 DOTmed.com, Inc.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED