Law to reduce unneeded Medicare CT, MR exams delayed by Trump administration
Current Location:
> This Story

Log in or Register to rate this News Story
Forward Printable StoryPrint Comment




U.S. Healthcare Homepage

ONC takes aim at data sharing and interoperability The 21st Century Cures Act is about more than just medical research

RSNA and ACR to establish clinical data registry for 3D printing Demonstrating clinical value of 3D printing and best use of the technology

Half of US hospital leaders surveyed are unfamiliar with premise of AI Less than a quarter are currently seeking to implement it

MD Anderson to expand proton therapy center with $159 million project Increases accessibility to higher number of patients

NY law requires coverage for medically necessary mammo for women under 40 More than 12,000 younger women diagnosed with breast cancer annually

Siemens diagnostics president to step down, new board member appointed CEO Bernd Montag will assume responsibility of the business unit

US Court of Appeals rejects Hologic petition to revisit patent invalidation Regards case against Minerva Surgical's Endometrial Ablation System

Hospital M&A revenue rose to $11.3 billion in Q2 this year Atrium Health acquiring Wake Forest Baptist Health was most notable

New bill calls for changing reimbursement for radiopharmaceuticals Aims for greater patient access to nuclear medicine exams

Siemens forms $113 million alliance with UM System and MU Health Care The 10-year partnership will focus on improved care delivery and research

Law to reduce unneeded Medicare CT, MR exams delayed by Trump administration

by Thomas Dworetzky , Contributing Reporter
The Protecting Access to Medicare Act, law since 2014, is being delayed by the Trump administration, according to a Kaiser Health News report via NPR.

Federal officials “have yet to implement” the law, which covers such diagnostic procedures as CT, PET, nuclear medicine and MR, according to Kaiser Health News (KHN). They have now pushed the start date to January 2020 — from 2018 — and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services is making the first year one of "testing," so the agency will still cover scans even if doctors don't check the guidelines first. Plans now call for determining overuse penalties sometime in the 2022-2023 range, said the news service.

Story Continues Below Advertisement


Special-Pricing Available on Medical Displays, Patient Monitors, Recorders, Printers, Media, Ultrasound Machines, and Cameras.This includes Top Brands such as SONY, BARCO, NDS, NEC, LG, EDAN, EIZO, ELO, FSN, PANASONIC, MITSUBISHI, OLYMPUS, & WIDE.

The law requires practitioners ordering “advanced diagnostic imaging service” for a Medicare patient to consult with a qualified Clinical Decision Support Mechanism — or guidelines — with the aim of cutting down on unneeded tests that can waste money and harm patients. Those who over-order could face penalties.

Critics worry such delays will mean Medicare pays millions for unneeded tests and patients get hit with unnecessary radiation.

"These delays mean that many more inappropriate imaging procedures will be performed, wasting financial resources and subjecting patients to services they do not need," Gary Young, director of the Northeastern University Center for Health Policy and Healthcare Research in Boston, told the news service, noting that, "If this program were implemented stringently, you would certainly reduce inappropriate imaging to some degree."

The law zeros in on testing with fee-for-service Medicare patients — health insurers have already been balking at paying for such tests without some form of preauthorization.

"CMS expects to learn more about the prevalence of imaging orders identified as 'not appropriate' under this program when we begin to identify outlier ordering professionals," a CMS spokeswoman told KHN.

The focus of the use of guidelines is on non-workflow disrupting tests, so patients in the emergency room and hospital aren't part of the program. CMS is focusing guideline-use on situations typically involving less time-critical testing, such as for headaches, heart disease, and back, neck, and shoulder pain.

Some complain that the law is overreaching and burdensome.
  Pages: 1 - 2 >>

U.S. Healthcare Homepage

You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment