Over 1600 Total Lots Up For Auction at Four Locations - NJ Cleansweep 05/07, NJ Cleansweep 05/08, CA 05/09, CO 05/12

Imaging Alone Is Not Enough in Breast Cancer Detection

by Barbara Kram, Editor | March 08, 2006
Biopsies remain the most
effective technique when
mammography or a physical
examination reveals a
potential problem
Plymouth Meeting, Pa. -- Four common noninvasive diagnostic tests for breast cancer are not accurate enough to rule out breast cancer for women with abnormal findings from mammograms or physical examinations that are suggestive of breast cancer, according to a report from the U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) conducted by ECRI, a nonprofit health services research agency. ECRI's evidence report found that the diagnostic tests would miss four to nine percent of breast cancer cases for women with an average risk of the disease as compared to biopsy. The report was reviewed by distinguished breast cancer researchers, including radiologists, prior to publication.

ECRI, an Evidence-based Practice Center, produced the comparative-effectiveness report for AHRQ's new Effective Health Care Program. Publicly available on AHRQ's Web site at http://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/synthesize/reports/final.cfm, Effectiveness of Noninvasive Diagnostic Tests for Breast Abnormalities finds that each of the four tests--magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasonography, positron emission tomography (PET) scanning, and scintimammography--would miss cases of cancer if used alone to evaluate women with abnormal mammograms suggestive of breast cancer.

"So many women today undergo biopsies only to learn they do not have breast cancer. Hopefully, noninvasive tests can continue to improve so that in the future, there will be a viable alternative to biopsy," said AHRQ's director, Carolyn M. Clancy, M.D. "But early and accurate diagnosis of breast cancer is crucial, and at this time, biopsies remain the most effective technique when mammography or physical examination reveals a potential problem."
stats Advertisement
DOTmed text ad

Training and education based on your needs

Stay up to date with the latest training to fix, troubleshoot, and maintain your critical care devices. GE HealthCare offers multiple training formats to empower teams and expand knowledge, saving you time and money

stats
Mammography and physical examination are both used to detect the possibility of breast cancer. A woman with an abnormal mammogram or physical examination needs further confirmation to determine whether cancer is present. Currently, confirmation is sometimes recommended through a tissue biopsy, either by surgical excision or needle sampling. Only about one in five women currently getting a biopsy for an abnormal mammogram or breast examination has breast cancer. The need for confirmation of the mammogram means some 80 percent of women with an abnormal mammogram who undergo the biopsy procedure ultimately are found not to have cancer. Accurate noninvasive tests could reduce the number of women needing to undergo a biopsy.

A total of 81 studies met ECRI's inclusion criteria for the systematic review. Although all of the technologies evaluated could reduce the need for biopsy in women with abnormal mammogram findings who do not have cancer, each would miss some cancers. The four tests reviewed in the study, and their results, were: