DOTmed Home MRI Oncology Ultrasound Molecular Imaging X-Ray Cardiology Health IT Business Affairs
News Home Parts & Service Operating Room CT Women's Health Proton Therapy Endoscopy HTMs Mobile Imaging
SEARCH
Current Location:
>
> This Story


Log in or Register to rate this News Story
Forward Printable StoryPrint Comment

 

 

Oncology Homepage

Survey finds most patients prefer annual mammograms Challenges the USPSTF's recommendations

Carestream Health now shipping MyVue Center Self-Service Kiosk Provides patients with access to imaging exam records quicker

MEVION S250i Proton Therapy System scores CE mark First European installation to be in Netherlands

Researchers develop CT system for imaging extremely small objects Generates high-resolution 3-D images

RaySearch enters boron neutron capture therapy field Will add BNCT as a radiotherapy modality through alliance with Neutron Therapeutics

Can theranostics be the key to completely curing colorectal cancer? Preclinical trials yield promising results

Varian to install ProBeam at Penn Medicine and new hospital in China The 'latest proof of growing worldwide interest' in proton therapy

At PTCOG, research points to a need for greater access to proton therapy Pediatric patients face delays in insurance coverage

Karen Horton John Hopkins names director of department of radiology and radiological science

Proton therapy trumps IMRT for prostate cancer: study Research points to higher survival rates and fewer complications

Breast density and mammographic sensitivity have a strong linear correlation

by Christina Hwang , Contributing Reporter
A linear relationship between breast density and mammographic sensitivity was further evaluated by research published in the American Journal of Roentgenology.

A team from Elizabeth Wende Breast Care (EWBC) conducted a study over a four year time period, collecting the information of 771 patients with breast cancer. Breast density was measured using the American College of Radiology’s BI-RADS density categories. VolparaDensity, a software tool that generates a breast density percentage and a Volpara Density Grade — similar to the BI-RADS categories — was also used to assess breast density.

Story Continues Below Advertisement

Ask Any Woman. She Wants a Better Breast Imaging Experience.

SoftVue Can Bring It. In today's healthcare environment, a positive patient experience is central in providing excellent patient care. This is where SoftVue comes in - click to read more>>>



When using the BI-RADS categories to classify breast density as almost entirely fatty, scattered density, heterogeneously dense, and extremely dense, the researchers found that mammographic sensitivity was 82 percent, 90 percent, 84 percent and 66 percent, respectively.

According to the researchers, the linear relationship between mammographic sensitivity and breast density was more apparent when using the Volpara Density Grade than when using the BI-RADS categories. Using VolparaDensity categories, the mammographic sensitivity was 95 percent, 89 percent, 83 percent and 65 percent.

“The visual assessment of determining BI-RADS categories tends to be subjective from radiologist to radiologist and less reproducible depending on the experience of the radiologist, volume of interpretation by the radiologist, prior mammogram density assignment – and is much less consistent,” Dr. Stamatia Destounis, Elizabeth Wende Breast Care, clinical professor, University of Rochester School of Medicine & Dentistry, told HCB News.

Results from the study showed that denser breasts were associated with the risk of being diagnosed with an interval cancer, a cancer that is not detected by screening but possibly palpated by the patient or her physician.

“Prior studies have detected higher rates of missed cancers in the denser breast tissue leading to higher numbers of interval cancers, but also higher breast cancer detection rates in denser breasts,” Destounis said.

Within each density category, the researchers also discovered there was a wide range of mammographic sensitivity. For example, women who were categorized in the “low” Volpara Density Grade category four had a sensitivity of 72 percent, and women in the “high” category four had a sensitivity of 58 percent.

According to Destounis, these results suggest that some women with dense breasts may still have an acceptable level of sensitivity and additional screening is unnecessary. Instead of giving women a density score, the patient could be given the average sensitivity for women in the same breast density, so she could make a more educated decision on whether or not she needs additional screening.

“Correct assessment of a woman’s breast density is important, as it can help to appropriately determine who may benefit most from adjunct screening, such as screening ultrasound,” said Destounis. “This is ever the more important as more states adopt density notification legislation, and demand increases for additional screening services.”

Oncology Homepage


You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment

Advertise
Increase Your
Brand Awareness
Auctions + Private Sales
Get The
Best Price
Buy Equipment/Parts
Find The
Lowest Price
Daily News
Read The
Latest News
Directory
Browse All
DOTmed Users
Ethics on DOTmed
View Our
Ethics Program
Gold Parts Vendor Program
Receive PH
Requests
Gold Service Dealer Program
Receive RFP/PS
Requests
Healthcare Providers
See all
HCP Tools
Jobs/Training
Find/Fill
A Job
Parts Hunter +EasyPay
Get Parts
Quotes
Recently Certified
View Recently
Certified Users
Recently Rated
View Recently
Certified Users
Rental Central
Rent Equipment
For Less
Sell Equipment/Parts
Get The
Most Money
Service Technicians Forum
Find Help
And Advice
Simple RFP
Get Equipment
Quotes
Virtual Trade Show
Find Service
For Equipment
Access and use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions of our LEGAL NOTICE & PRIVACY NOTICE
Property of and Proprietary to DOTmed.com, Inc. Copyright ©2001-2017 DOTmed.com, Inc.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED