DOTmed Home MRI Oncology Ultrasound Molecular Imaging X-Ray Cardiology Health IT Business Affairs
News Home Parts & Service Operating Room CT Women's Health Proton Therapy Endoscopy HTMs Mobile Imaging
SEARCH
Current Location:
>
> This Story


Log in or Register to rate this News Story
Forward Printable StoryPrint Comment
advertisement

 

advertisement

 

MRI Homepage

13-year-old creates algorithm to target pancreas during MR radiotherapy Bringing AI to a difficult cancer

Surgeons can 'listen' to brain during tumor removal with new technique Can predict likely outcome of removing certain brain tissue

GE to provide training to at least 140 Kenyan radiographers Partnering with Society of Radiography in Kenya

James Alecxih ViewRay appoints chief commercial officer

IMRIS and Siemens take on growing hybrid OR neurosurgical market together Support sales for MR, CT and angiography

Le Bonheur Children's Hospital first to install Triux neo MEG system Assesses neurological conditions with functional brain imaging

FDA okays Insightec's MR-guided focused ultrasound with Siemens scanners Using Exablate Neuro for treating essential tremor

The MR patient experience Technologists, effective distractions and advanced MR tech are improving patient comfort

When it comes to MR safety, make sure the right hearing protection doesn’t fall on deaf ears Understanding the dangers of ear damage during scans, and what can be done about it

NIH grants over $1 million to development of non-contrast imaging approaches Will be used to diagnose peripheral arterial disease

A Michigan health system decreased
its waiting time for breast MRs
from 101 to 5 days

How to lower breast MR wait times from 101 days to five

by John R. Fischer , Staff Reporter
Imaging providers seeking to slash waiting times for specialized MR procedures may want to take a cue from the University of Michigan’s health system, which managed to lower its breast MR waiting time from 101 days to five.

The reduction stems from a quality improvement (QI) initiative conducted between December 2014 and March 2016 that examined waiting periods for breast MR scans as well as scheduling grids and staff models. The researchers concluded that the imaging backlog was primarily driven by two factors: a deficiency in the number of trained technologists and the need for radiologist supervision.

Story Continues Below Advertisement

THE (LEADER) IN MEDICAL IMAGING TECHNOLOGY SINCE 1982. SALES-SERVICE-REPAIR

Special-Pricing Available on Medical Displays, Patient Monitors, Recorders, Printers, Media, Ultrasound Machines, and Cameras.This includes Top Brands such as SONY, BARCO, NDS, NEC, LG, EDAN, EIZO, ELO, FSN, PANASONIC, MITSUBISHI, OLYMPUS, & WIDE.



“When a specialized examination is being initiated, radiologists and MR administration should establish institutional criteria for technologist didactic learning, the length of supervised scanning, and the minimum number of supervised MR examinations performed prior to independent scanning,” Colleen H. Neal, a clinical associate professor of radiology at Michigan Medicine and the lead author of the study, told HCB News.

A total of 798 breast MR exams were conducted during the study, with researchers increasing the number of MR technologists qualified to perform exams from three to seven by training four trainees based on a checklist concerning pre-scan requirements, within-scan requirements, and documentation requirements.

Following a series of reviews and ten supervised scans, trainees were able to independently perform exams, eliminating the need for radiologists to be present, while still maintaining image quality and service.

Following one month after training commenced, the facility was able to schedule exams on weekends, when personnel were unavailable. After eight additional months the facility accommodated exams after 5 AM on weekdays.

These changes increased breast MR volume from 23 to 50 per month and decreased wait times by an average of 96 days.

Many regions of the U.S. witnessed a 16-fold increase in volume for breast MR scans between 2000 and 2011, with the University of Michigan experiencing a similar jump by 2014.

Scanning this growing patient population is hindered in certain states where providers require government-issued certificates of need for access to MR scanners, as well as complex imaging studies that require the presence of multiple specialized personnel.

“I would advise radiologists to involve the MR administration and lead technologists early in the process in order to engage the entire team,” Neal said. “Training additional technologists in a specialized MR examination will take time, so patience and persistence are necessary.”

The study was published in the Journal of the American College of Radiology.

MRI Homepage


You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment

Advertise
Increase Your
Brand Awareness
Auctions + Private Sales
Get The
Best Price
Buy Equipment/Parts
Find The
Lowest Price
Daily News
Read The
Latest News
Directory
Browse All
DOTmed Users
Ethics on DOTmed
View Our
Ethics Program
Gold Parts Vendor Program
Receive PH
Requests
Gold Service Dealer Program
Receive RFP/PS
Requests
Healthcare Providers
See all
HCP Tools
Jobs/Training
Find/Fill
A Job
Parts Hunter +EasyPay
Get Parts
Quotes
Recently Certified
View Recently
Certified Users
Recently Rated
View Recently
Certified Users
Rental Central
Rent Equipment
For Less
Sell Equipment/Parts
Get The
Most Money
Service Technicians Forum
Find Help
And Advice
Simple RFP
Get Equipment
Quotes
Virtual Trade Show
Find Service
For Equipment
Access and use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions of our LEGAL NOTICE & PRIVACY NOTICE
Property of and Proprietary to DOTmed.com, Inc. Copyright ©2001-2018 DOTmed.com, Inc.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED