DOTmed Home MRI Oncology Ultrasound Molecular Imaging X-Ray Cardiology Health IT Business Affairs
News Home Parts & Service Operating Room CT Women's Health Proton Therapy Endoscopy HTMs Pediatrics
SEARCH
Current Location:
>
> This Story

starstarstarstarstar (1)
Log in or Register to rate this News Story
Forward Printable StoryPrint Comment
advertisement

 

advertisement

 

Business Affairs Homepage

Installing and removing imaging equipment is no small task Expert insights on how project management is evolving

GE likely to hold onto NY digital X-ray detector manufacturing plant — for now New York State facility employs 125 workers

Ohio radiology services president indicted in Medicare scam Charged for services never provided and received nearly $2 million

Getting ahead of the digital health avalanche How can a health system know which innovative tools are worth its time?

Half of radiologists have net worth of $2 million or more New survey analyzed responses from over 20,000 physicians in over 30 specialties

Varian to acquire Cancer Treatment Services International for $283 million Enables production of multidisciplinary solutions

FBI opens probe into alleged kickbacks by healthcare OEMs in Brazil Accused of making bribes to sell medical equipment

icometrix raises $18 million in funding Will help with deployment of icobrain software in Europe

Q&A with Michael Darling, VP Supply Chain, St. Luke’s Health System Discussing the clinical integration of supply chain

Consolidation, consumerism and telehealth are the top three industry trends for 2019 According to a wide sampling of 1,000 healthcare stakeholders

At RSNA 2017 Canon and Toshiba
exhibited side by side

Canon, Toshiba each hit with $2.5 million fine over acquisition deal

by Thomas Dworetzky , Contributing Reporter
More fallout from the controversial $6.1 billion Canon-Toshiba deal.

The two companies have agreed to pay $2.5 million each to settle federal charges that they violated premerger notification and waiting period requirements of the Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) Act with the unusual nature of the 2016 transaction in which Canon acquired Toshiba Medical Systems (TMSC).

Story Continues Below Advertisement

RaySafe helps you avoid unnecessary radiation

RaySafe solutions are designed to minimize the need for user interaction, bringing unprecedented simplicity & usability to the X-ray room. We're committed to establishing a radiation safety culture wherever technicians & medical staff encounter radiation.



“The prior notice provisions of the HSR Act are designed to allow the agencies to analyze a proposed transaction before it is consummated to determine whether it will harm competition,” Bruce Hoffman, Director of the Federal Trade Commission’s Bureau of Competition, said in a DOJ statement about the agreement, noting that, “deliberately structuring a transaction to avoid or delay HSR filing undermines the efficacy of the premerger notification process, regardless of whether the parties’ motives for doing so in a particular case were anticompetitive. We will be vigilant in seeking relief against attempts to circumvent the HSR Act’s filing requirements.”

The complaint and proposed final judgment have been filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia and now await, after a 60-day public comment period, final court approval.

The settlement also requires that the companies put in place HSR compliance programs and agree to inspection and reporting requirements.

In the complaint, DOJ alleged that the two firms “devised a scheme to avoid” waiting period requirements and that the arrangement “had no purpose” beyond enabling the deal to close before March 31, 2016.

“Canon and Toshiba structured their transaction for the purpose of avoiding the HSR Act’s requirements,” noted Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim of the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division. “An acquiring person may not enlist a third party to make an acquisition on its behalf to evade the HSR Act.”

The DOJ complaint alleged that the impetus behind the maneuverings stemmed from “long-running financial irregularities at Toshiba,” which exploded into public view in 2015, and that these revelations, in turn, necessitated that Toshiba “shore up its financial statement,” which it had to do by recognizing the sale proceeds from the deal “by the end of its 2015 fiscal year on March 31, 2016.”

The complaint further claimed that both companies, by their “own admission,” acknowledged the problem. “It simply was not possible to complete a significant acquisition of TMSC voting securities before the end of Toshiba’s fiscal year due to the review periods under various merger control laws.”
  Pages: 1 - 2 >>

Business Affairs Homepage


You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment

Advertise
Increase Your
Brand Awareness
Auctions + Private Sales
Get The
Best Price
Buy Equipment/Parts
Find The
Lowest Price
Daily News
Read The
Latest News
Directory
Browse All
DOTmed Users
Ethics on DOTmed
View Our
Ethics Program
Gold Parts Vendor Program
Receive PH
Requests
Gold Service Dealer Program
Receive RFP/PS
Requests
Healthcare Providers
See all
HCP Tools
Jobs/Training
Find/Fill
A Job
Parts Hunter +EasyPay
Get Parts
Quotes
Recently Certified
View Recently
Certified Users
Recently Rated
View Recently
Certified Users
Rental Central
Rent Equipment
For Less
Sell Equipment/Parts
Get The
Most Money
Service Technicians Forum
Find Help
And Advice
Simple RFP
Get Equipment
Quotes
Virtual Trade Show
Find Service
For Equipment
Access and use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions of our LEGAL NOTICE & PRIVACY NOTICE
Property of and Proprietary to DOTmed.com, Inc. Copyright ©2001-2019 DOTmed.com, Inc.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED