RSNA and ACR to establish clinical data registry for 3D printing
Current Location:
> This Story

Log in or Register to rate this News Story
Forward Printable StoryPrint Comment




U.S. Healthcare Homepage

ONC takes aim at data sharing and interoperability The 21st Century Cures Act is about more than just medical research

Half of US hospital leaders surveyed are unfamiliar with premise of AI Less than a quarter are currently seeking to implement it

Law to reduce unneeded Medicare CT, MR exams delayed by Trump administration Overuse penalties stalled until 2022 or 2023: Kaiser Health News

MD Anderson to expand proton therapy center with $159 million project Increases accessibility to higher number of patients

NY law requires coverage for medically necessary mammo for women under 40 More than 12,000 younger women diagnosed with breast cancer annually

Siemens diagnostics president to step down, new board member appointed CEO Bernd Montag will assume responsibility of the business unit

US Court of Appeals rejects Hologic petition to revisit patent invalidation Regards case against Minerva Surgical's Endometrial Ablation System

Hospital M&A revenue rose to $11.3 billion in Q2 this year Atrium Health acquiring Wake Forest Baptist Health was most notable

New bill calls for changing reimbursement for radiopharmaceuticals Aims for greater patient access to nuclear medicine exams

Siemens forms $113 million alliance with UM System and MU Health Care The 10-year partnership will focus on improved care delivery and research

RSNA and ACR are establishing a
clinical data registry for 3D printing

RSNA and ACR to establish clinical data registry for 3D printing

by John R. Fischer , Staff Reporter
The Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) and the American College of Radiology have set to work establishing a new medical 3D printing clinical data registry.

The registry will act as a resource, offering information on 3D printing at the point of clinical care to help providers learn about the clinical value of the practice, the different technologies necessary for generating physical models from medical images, and the complexity of the models.

Story Continues Below Advertisement

New & Refurbished C-Arm Systems. Call 702.384.0085 Today!

KenQuest provides all major brands of surgical c-arms (new and refurbished) and carries a large inventory for purchase or rent. With over 20 years in the medical equipment business we can help you fulfill your equipment needs

"The registry is slated to be one of several successful ACR-based registries. Institutions will be provided the opportunity to participate in the registry, after which they will be provided credentials similar to other registries," Frank Rybicki, chair of the ACR Committee on Appropriateness Criteria and founding chair of the RSNA SIG, told HCB News. "There are no limitations on institutions who provide data; the goal is to have high quality data that drives value of the collective technologies. The registry is an academic program and is designed to gather data for publications to be submitted with future billing codes."

While the use of 3D printing has been proposed to address numerous clinical indications, it is this diversity that has made it difficult to pin down its clinical value for decision-making and an understanding of how to use the technology appropriately.

Recent efforts to change this include the release of four new Category III Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for the creation of 3D anatomical models and anatomic guides. RSNA and ACR seek for the registry to provide data that can be used to meet these requirements, with the ACR’s National Radiology Data Registry (NRDR) system hosting it. NRDR is home to six registries compiled from more than 6,500 participant sites and over 150 million cumulative cases.

Specialists expected to benefit from the registry include, but are not limited to, oncologists, radiation therapy doctors, oncology surgeons, orthopedic surgeons, craniomaxillofacial surgeons, cardiovascular surgeons, interventional radiologists and cardiologists.

"The challenge for any registry is quality data and measurable outcomes. There is data, mostly anecdotal, that 3D printing enables procedures that would otherwise not be possible. There is also secondary evidence that 3D printing adds extraordinary value," said Rybicki, adding that, "the main tip for participants is commitment. Entering data into a registry takes time and effort. Care providers do it, but success will rely on communication of how and why the registry exists. With good communication, we can get the buy-in from 3D printing practices to seek and enter the data needed."

Information about the registry, including how to participate, will be posted to the NRDR website as it becomes available.

Support was provided by Dr. Jane Matsumoto, Mr. Andy Christensen, Dr. Kenneth Wang, Dr. Leonid Chepelev, Dr. Edward Quigley, Dr. Justin Ryan and Dr. Nicole Wake, as well as financially by industry partners Formlabs, HP, Materialise and Stratasys.

A joint ACR-RSNA committee will govern the registry, with a pilot intended for the fall of 2019.

U.S. Healthcare Homepage

You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment