by John R. Fischer
, Senior Reporter | March 30, 2020
The Department of Justice has accused Anthem of knowingly submitting inaccurate medical codes in exchange for higher payments for its Medicare Advantage plans.
The Department of Justice is taking Anthem to court in what is one of the largest Medicare Advantage fraud lawsuits to date.
The U.S. agency has accused the healthcare insurer of intentionally submitting inaccurate medical codes to the federal government to receive higher payments in return for its Medicare Advantage plans — payments funded by millions of dollars in taxes. Anthem denies any wrongdoing.
“We are confident that our health plans and associates have complied with Medicare Advantage regulations, including those set forth by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), and we intend to vigorously defend our Medicare risk adjustment practices,” the insurer told HCB News in an email. “The government is trying to hold Anthem and other Medicare Advantage plans to payment standards that CMS does not apply to original Medicare, and those inconsistent standards violate the law.”
Reveal Mobi Pro integrates the Reveal 35C detector with SpectralDR technology into a modern mobile X-ray solution. Mobi Pro allows for simultaneous acquisition of conventional & dual-energy images with a single exposure. Contact us for a demo at no cost.
The allegations according to the lawsuit
are purported to have taken place between early 2014 and early 2018, and concern Anthem’s use of “risk adjustment”, a practice in which Medicare Advantage companies assign scores to their members based on the health conditions they have.
Higher risk scores for a patient demand higher payments from the federal government to companies that insure him or her. Insurers must review patient medical charts to verify health conditions and delete any inaccurate diagnoses. A deletion requires companies to pay back the federal government for funds provided to it for the condition in question.
The DOJ alleges that Anthem only focused on finding “all possible new revenue-generating codes” and knowingly ignored all erroneous diagnoses. Among its evidence is a case from 2015 involving a member who had active lung cancer. It says that Anthem did not substantiate the diagnosis and instead of deleting it, added another three codes that led to a $7,000 overpayment for the member for that year.
The fraud, according to the suit, involved the use of a “retrospective chart review” program in which a hired vendor would review medical records from providers for services they provided to beneficiaries enrolled in Anthem’s Part C plans, and identify all the diagnosis codes supported by the records.
“This process was ‘retrospective’ because it typically occurred at least several months after Anthem had submitted to CMS the diagnosis codes reported by providers,” wrote the agency in its suit. “Anthem knew that the results of chart review could indicate whether or not the diagnosis codes Anthem previously submitted to CMS were accurate. More specifically, Anthem knew that the diagnosis codes it previously submitted to CMS, but which could not be substantiated by Anthem’s retrospective chart review, had likely been reported inaccurately... Anthem used chart reviews only to submit additional diagnosis codes to CMS, while turning a blind eye to negative results where chart reviews could not substantiate the diagnosis codes that Anthem had previously submitted to CMS.”
Anthem counters that the suit is one of many attempts to hold it and other insurers to a standard on risk adjustment practices, without providing clear guidelines.
“Where regulations have not been clear, Anthem has been transparent with CMS about its business practices and good faith efforts to comply with program rules,” it said in its emailed statement. “We think the agency should update regulations if it would like to change how it reimburses plans for services delivered.”
Until now, the DOJ has not filed a lawsuit against a major player, according to news outlet Axios
, which reports that allegations of fraud like this continue to be made against insurers of the program. The result of this case could have significant consequences for Medicare Advantage, which continues to enroll seniors and people with disabilities at high rates.