DOTmed Home MRI Oncology Ultrasound Molecular Imaging X-Ray Cardiology Health IT Business Affairs
News Home Parts & Service Operating Room CT Women's Health Proton Therapy Endoscopy HTMs Mobile Imaging
SEARCH
Current Location:
>
> This Story


Log in or Register to rate this News Story
Forward Printable StoryPrint Comment

 

Business Affairs Homepage

Olympus expands its EndoTherapy product line One new device and two business deals

UK has third lowest number of radiologists per population out of 31 EU countries Nearly two-thirds of posts remained unfilled for 12 months or longer in 2016

Survey finds medical devices not meeting provider expectations A call for higher-quality clinical evidence, flexible contract options and better customer service

European Society of Radiology calls for diagnostics to be better represented in value-based care Diagnosis 'is the basis for any treatment decision'

GE Healthcare receives Carequality certification Centricity customers can share data among multiple providers

Canon elaborates on financial goals with Toshiba Medical in the fold 'Launching into the global health market ... in one fell swoop'

Former Cleveland Clinic Innovations director pleads guilty to fraud Scheme cost the institution over $2.7 million

NuVasive files lawsuit against former vice chairman Alleges breach of fiduciary duties and violation of contractual obligations

Blue Earth Diagnostics inks Axumin deal with Seibersdorf Laboratories Manufacturing and distribution in certain European countries

Philips to halt production of external defibrillators in two U.S. facilities OEM looks ahead, calling consent decree 'consequence of past sins'

J&J hip implant judgement slashed in half by judge

by Thomas Dworetzky , Contributing Reporter
The $1 billion December jury award over bad hip implants against Johnson & Johnson and subsidiary DePuy Orthopaedics has been slashed to $500 million by U.S. District Judge Ed Kinkeade in Dallas.

He stated in his final report that “although the jury awarded $84,000,000 in punitive damages from Defendant DePuy Orthopaedics Inc., and $84,000,000 in punitive damages from Defendant Johnson & Johnson, constitutional considerations limit the amount a plaintiff may recover in punitive damages."

Story Continues Below Advertisement

qualiTEE - reliabiliTEE - repairabiliTEE - we guaranTEE

Bayer HealthCare Multi Vendor Service will repair your transducer with the same precision and care you provide to your patients. Now offering TotalREPAIR on 140 transducer models! Call us at 1-844-5100 or visit www.mvs.bayer.com to set up an order today.



The legal context, he observed, concerned a prior 2003 case (State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Campbell, 538 U.S. 408, 42), which held that “[f]ew awards exceeding a single-digit ratio between punitive and compensatory damages, to a significant degree, will satisfy due process...“

Kinkeade noted that in this ruling, “single-digit multipliers are more likely to comport with due process, while still achieving the State’s goals of deterrence and retribution.”

As a result he followed this consideration and reduced the punitive damages.

For plaintiff Marvin Andrews punitive damages were cut from $84 million against J&J and $84 million against DePuy to “$37,064,922.66 against Defendant DePuy Orthopaedics Inc., and $37,064,922.66 against Defendant Johnson & Johnson.”

The court also rendered a judgment for Elizabeth Andrews “for punitive damages in the amount of $125,000 against Defendant DePuy Orthopaedics Inc., and $125,000 against Defendant Johnson & Johnson.”

The decision will lower the awards for all plaintiffs who are in California, in similar fashion.

The implants led to tissue death, bone erosion and other injuries they attributed to design flaws, according to Reuters.

The metal-on-metal devices were touted as lasting longer than ones made with ceramics or plastic. Sales were halted in 2013, and at that time J&J and DePuy settled over 7,000 lawsuits for about $2.5 billion.

In December 2016, a federal jury in Dallas returned the $1 billion decision.

The suit was filed on behalf of six people who got the devices, according to lead plaintiff attorney Mark Lanier of the Lanier Law Firm in Houston

"Once again, a jury has listened to the testimony of both sides, and returned a verdict affirming what we've known all along: a responsible company would settle these cases and take care of their injured consumers, rather than forcing them through expensive and vexatious litigation just to delay justice," said Lanier at the time. "This jury spoke loud and clear, and I hope J&J will finally listen."
  Pages: 1 - 2 >>

Business Affairs Homepage


You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment

Advertise
Increase Your
Brand Awareness
Auctions + Private Sales
Get The
Best Price
Buy Equipment/Parts
Find The
Lowest Price
Daily News
Read The
Latest News
Directory
Browse All
DOTmed Users
Ethics on DOTmed
View Our
Ethics Program
Gold Parts Vendor Program
Receive PH
Requests
Gold Service Dealer Program
Receive RFP/PS
Requests
Healthcare Providers
See all
HCP Tools
Jobs/Training
Find/Fill
A Job
Parts Hunter +EasyPay
Get Parts
Quotes
Recently Certified
View Recently
Certified Users
Recently Rated
View Recently
Certified Users
Rental Central
Rent Equipment
For Less
Sell Equipment/Parts
Get The
Most Money
Service Technicians Forum
Find Help
And Advice
Simple RFP
Get Equipment
Quotes
Virtual Trade Show
Find Service
For Equipment
Access and use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions of our LEGAL NOTICE & PRIVACY NOTICE
Property of and Proprietary to DOTmed.com, Inc. Copyright ©2001-2017 DOTmed.com, Inc.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED