DOTmed Home MRI Oncology Ultrasound Molecular Imaging X-Ray Cardiology Health IT Business Affairs
News Home Parts & Service Operating Room CT Women's Health Proton Therapy Endoscopy HTMs Mobile Imaging
SEARCH
Current Location:
>
> This Story


Log in or Register to rate this News Story
Forward Printable StoryPrint Comment

 

Business Affairs Homepage

Sanford Health, Mid Dakota merger heads to court Would create a group with at least a 75 percent share of physician services

Siemens $300 million Walpole groundbreaking set for June 30 Expanding a key manufacturing and R&D facility

Philips to buy EEG technology manufacturer for approximately €32.9 million Company plans to establish new neurology portfolio

Global hospital bed market to surpass $6 billion by 2021 Automated beds becoming a popular choice

Physician groups line up in support of proposed tweaks to MIPS and APMs Giving providers more time to adjust to new requirements

Philips to shutter Dunlee parts facility in Illinois, move operations to Germany Says GTC replacement market in 'significant' decline

RaySearch inks OIS deal with the University of Wisconsin-Madison Planned launch in second half of 2017

Army to modernize battlefield radiography with Canon's mobile X-ray units DoD to invest in over 100 RadPRO1 SOLTUS 100M systems

Better design needed for reusable devices, experts say Addressing challenges of reprocessing and reducing HAIs at MD&M East in NYC

Survey finds radiologists want greater involvement in patient care Workload and time constraints stand in the way

J&J hip implant judgement slashed in half by judge

by Thomas Dworetzky , Contributing Reporter
The $1 billion December jury award over bad hip implants against Johnson & Johnson and subsidiary DePuy Orthopaedics has been slashed to $500 million by U.S. District Judge Ed Kinkeade in Dallas.

He stated in his final report that “although the jury awarded $84,000,000 in punitive damages from Defendant DePuy Orthopaedics Inc., and $84,000,000 in punitive damages from Defendant Johnson & Johnson, constitutional considerations limit the amount a plaintiff may recover in punitive damages."

Story Continues Below Advertisement

Four Ways a Point of Care Ecosystem Improves Patient Experiences

What impacts the patient experience? A lot of things. Most caregivers understand care interactions are important, but do you know how a point of care ecosystem can improve the patient experience? Click to learn more



The legal context, he observed, concerned a prior 2003 case (State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Campbell, 538 U.S. 408, 42), which held that “[f]ew awards exceeding a single-digit ratio between punitive and compensatory damages, to a significant degree, will satisfy due process...“

Kinkeade noted that in this ruling, “single-digit multipliers are more likely to comport with due process, while still achieving the State’s goals of deterrence and retribution.”

As a result he followed this consideration and reduced the punitive damages.

For plaintiff Marvin Andrews punitive damages were cut from $84 million against J&J and $84 million against DePuy to “$37,064,922.66 against Defendant DePuy Orthopaedics Inc., and $37,064,922.66 against Defendant Johnson & Johnson.”

The court also rendered a judgment for Elizabeth Andrews “for punitive damages in the amount of $125,000 against Defendant DePuy Orthopaedics Inc., and $125,000 against Defendant Johnson & Johnson.”

The decision will lower the awards for all plaintiffs who are in California, in similar fashion.

The implants led to tissue death, bone erosion and other injuries they attributed to design flaws, according to Reuters.

The metal-on-metal devices were touted as lasting longer than ones made with ceramics or plastic. Sales were halted in 2013, and at that time J&J and DePuy settled over 7,000 lawsuits for about $2.5 billion.

In December 2016, a federal jury in Dallas returned the $1 billion decision.

The suit was filed on behalf of six people who got the devices, according to lead plaintiff attorney Mark Lanier of the Lanier Law Firm in Houston

"Once again, a jury has listened to the testimony of both sides, and returned a verdict affirming what we've known all along: a responsible company would settle these cases and take care of their injured consumers, rather than forcing them through expensive and vexatious litigation just to delay justice," said Lanier at the time. "This jury spoke loud and clear, and I hope J&J will finally listen."
  Pages: 1 - 2 >>

Business Affairs Homepage


You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment

Advertise
Increase Your
Brand Awareness
Auctions + Private Sales
Get The
Best Price
Buy Equipment/Parts
Find The
Lowest Price
Daily News
Read The
Latest News
Directory
Browse All
DOTmed Users
Ethics on DOTmed
View Our
Ethics Program
Gold Parts Vendor Program
Receive PH
Requests
Gold Service Dealer Program
Receive RFP/PS
Requests
Healthcare Providers
See all
HCP Tools
Jobs/Training
Find/Fill
A Job
Parts Hunter +EasyPay
Get Parts
Quotes
Recently Certified
View Recently
Certified Users
Recently Rated
View Recently
Certified Users
Rental Central
Rent Equipment
For Less
Sell Equipment/Parts
Get The
Most Money
Service Technicians Forum
Find Help
And Advice
Simple RFP
Get Equipment
Quotes
Virtual Trade Show
Find Service
For Equipment
Access and use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions of our LEGAL NOTICE & PRIVACY NOTICE
Property of and Proprietary to DOTmed.com, Inc. Copyright ©2001-2017 DOTmed.com, Inc.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED