Clean Sweep Live Auction on Wed. May 1st. Click to view the full inventory

DOTmed Home MRI Oncology Ultrasound Molecular Imaging X-Ray Cardiology Health IT Business Affairs
News Home Parts & Service Operating Room CT Women's Health Proton Therapy Endoscopy HTMs Pediatrics
Current Location:
> This Story

Log in or Register to rate this News Story
Forward Printable StoryPrint Comment




Business Affairs Homepage

Air medical transportation: How a 15-minute ride may cost $30,000, and how we can change it Reducing sky-high transport expenses

Canon's Vital Images wins DoD contract Maximum $100 million fixed‐price contract for radiology and imaging systems

Are you GDPR compliant? It's not just a question for EU-based companies Here are the top eight considerations

Security tightening at hospitals for patient safety A noticeable change is occurring at the front entrance to hospitals

Johnson & Johnson completes Auris Health deal The $3.4 billion acquisition could include additional payments up to $2.35 billion

Follow-up imaging study points to benefits of automated notification Raising the bar on manual callbacks

Change Healthcare files for IPO Could raise as much as $100 million, listing on Nasdaq

GE Healthcare IPO on hold as new deal takes spotlight Selling biopharma business to Danaher for over $21 billion

Asheville Radiology Association joins Strategic Radiology The latest expansion by the imaging coalition brings 43 new physicians to the table

Johnson & Johnson to acquire Auris Health for $3.4 billion With possible $2.35 billion added if certain milestones are hit

A new study says consolidation activities
like mergers do not improve quality
of care and may decrease
patient satisfaction

Mergers do nothing for quality of care, lower patient satisfaction, says study

by John R. Fischer , Staff Reporter
Providers and physician groups merge for a variety of reasons, from conserving costs to combining specialties, all undertaken with the assumption that it will improve patient care.

But do mergers actually benefit patients? A new study has found no improvement or decline in the quality of care – and actual decreases in patient satisfaction – provided by entities that combine with one another.

Story Continues Below Advertisement

RaySafe helps you avoid unnecessary radiation

RaySafe solutions are designed to minimize the need for user interaction, bringing unprecedented simplicity & usability to the X-ray room. We're committed to establishing a radiation safety culture wherever technicians & medical staff encounter radiation.

“Increased quality is used as an argument for integration with the expectation that it will decrease fragmentation and improve coordination of care. Unfortunately, we do not see evidence of this in our results,” co-author Marah Short, associate director of the Center for Health and Biosciences at Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy, told HCB News. “Across the 29 measures in our study, this type of integration is neither improving nor harming quality, overall.”

Evaluating data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ Hospital Compare database, Short and another co-author, Vivian Ho, the James A. Baker III Institute Chair in Health Economics and director of the center, used 29 data points and assessed 16 process of care to determine if increases in hospital market concentration or vertical integration between hospitals and physicians influence patient outcomes. Among these points were readmission rates; process of care measurements for how well a hospital provides care; and patient satisfaction scores.

Initially hypothesizing that better coordination among a primary care doctors, specialists and admitting and attending hospital physicians led to greater patient care, the two were surprised to find that the onset of vertical integration neither improved nor harmed quality of care.

“For the 16 processes of care examined, this could be, in part, due to the fact that these treatment standards are so widely accepted,” said Short. “Therefore, regardless of integration level, physicians want the best outcomes for patients and may adhere to common processes with or without hospital oversight.”

They also linked increased market concentration to lower levels of quality for patient satisfaction, chalking the matter up to less incentive among clinicians to keep patients happy, due to reductions in fear of or pressure from less competition.

Such a fact, they assert, may eventually negatively impact the quality of care provided to patients, but that further examination of patient experience is necessary.

“Further research is needed to determine how well better patient experience correlates with higher clinical quality. We have found that increased market concentration, which lowers competition, results in lower patient satisfaction," said Short. "And given the nature of these measures, there are those which may arguably directly affect quality of care, such as explaining medications or communicating well with patients. And if patient satisfaction does not correlate with higher clinical quality, better measures need to be developed and made available in terms that the average consumer can understand and utilize.”

The study was limited by the exclusion of certain outcomes, such as mortality and morbidity, as measures of quality. Patient satisfaction was assessed from surveys filled out by patients at the end of their hospital stay.

The findings were published in the journal, Medical Care Research and Review.

Business Affairs Homepage


Rey Barry


March 01, 2019 10:21

It's stunning to read a health merger story whose writer is unaware that increasing profit and cutting cost is behind mergers. Improving care is a very rare actual intent; increasing patient satisfaction is never one. The writer seems to base his understanding of motivation on media press releases. Beyond his apparent attention, newspaper financial pages and SEC filings open the window to the real reasons behind mergers and acquisitions. As always under capitalism, follow the money.

Log inor Register

to rate and post a comment

You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment

Increase Your
Brand Awareness
Auctions + Private Sales
Get The
Best Price
Buy Equipment/Parts
Find The
Lowest Price
Daily News
Read The
Latest News
Browse All
DOTmed Users
Ethics on DOTmed
View Our
Ethics Program
Gold Parts Vendor Program
Receive PH
Gold Service Dealer Program
Receive RFP/PS
Healthcare Providers
See all
HCP Tools
A Job
Parts Hunter +EasyPay
Get Parts
Recently Certified
View Recently
Certified Users
Recently Rated
View Recently
Certified Users
Rental Central
Rent Equipment
For Less
Sell Equipment/Parts
Get The
Most Money
Service Technicians Forum
Find Help
And Advice
Simple RFP
Get Equipment
Virtual Trade Show
Find Service
For Equipment
Access and use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions of our LEGAL NOTICE & PRIVACY NOTICE
Property of and Proprietary to DOTmed.com, Inc. Copyright ©2001-2019 DOTmed.com, Inc.