Silicon Valley investor paints dire picture for future of radiologists

Huge Two-Day Clean Sweep Auction July 24-25th. Click Here to Bid!

advertisement
Current Location:
>
> This Story

starstarstarstarstar (1)
Log in or Register to rate this News Story
Forward Printable StoryPrint Comment
advertisement

 

advertisement

 

Business Affairs Homepage

With stock value up 51 percent, is Mindray too pricey? Valuation has recently soared to $29 billion

Some medical devices exempted from China tariffs Among the recently announced, 110 exemptions

Noritsu acquires R&F Imaging Systems Expands R&F presence from regional to national scale

Consumer experience is top priority for 69 percent of US hospitals: survey Trend reflects growing patient burden in paying for services

Canon hit with $32 million fine by EU for Toshiba deal Used tactic dubbed 'warehousing' to get around filing requirements

Getting to 'yes' in enterprise imaging Tackling common problems on the road to more efficient radiology at SIIM

Bracco Imaging to acquire Blue Earth Diagnostics for $450 million Will gain rights over Axumin

IBM to pay $14.8 million to settle Maryland false claims allegations Settlement revolved around the 2011 acquisition by IBM of Cúram Software

Change Healthcare's IPO now heading beyond $1 billion Offering 49 million shares at $19 each

Installing and removing imaging equipment is no small task Expert insights on how project management is evolving

Silicon Valley investor paints dire picture for future of radiologists

by Thomas Dworetzky , Contributing Reporter
“Any radiologist who plans to practice in 10 years will be killing patients every day,” Silicon Valley investor and Sun Microsystems founder Vinod Khosla told the audience during his keynote talk at the recent Creative Destruction Lab’s Super Session in Toronto.

The long-time AI promoter was making the point he has been espousing for years, namely that due to advances in in artificial intelligence, software will be so effective in the near future that there will be no need for human image interpretation, according to TechCrunch.

Story Continues Below Advertisement

Servicing GE Nuclear Medicine equipment with OEM trained engineers

We offer full service contracts, PM contracts, rapid response, time and material,camera relocation. Nuclear medicine equipment service provider since 1975. Click or call now for more information 800 96 NUMED



“Radiologists are toast,” he told the audience, adding that radiology “shouldn’t be a job,” and that as AI advances continue, humans who continue to diagnose from imaging will “be causing deaths, because [they] choose to practice.”

His position is not new — he has been making the case in public statements since early 2017 — at which time he stated that he thought some types of physicians, including oncologists, could be “obsolete” in five years.

At this most recent address, Khosla said that he now felt the timeline would be more like 15 years.

For long-term AI watchers and medical professionals alike, the timeline for such AI revolutions are not just ambitious, they have a history of repeatedly slipping off into the future.

For some observers, such as computer scientist Geoffrey Hinton, the 5-year prediction was also compelling back in 2016.

“I think if you work as a radiologist, you’re like the coyote that’s already over the edge of the cliff, that hasn’t yet looked down, so doesn’t realize there’s no ground underneath him,” the British-Canadian said in a 2016 video screened at the SIIM-NYMIIS Regional Meeting in New York City in 2017, adding that, “people should stop training radiologists now. It’s just completely obvious that within five years, deep learning is going to do a lot better than radiologists because it’s going be able to get a lot more experience.”

It would seem that despite significant investments and efforts to replace people with machines, calls for the demise of human specialists remain premature.

Back in 2018, for example, the ambitious Watson Health project faced criticism, especially when a Stat article reported on internal company documents said to show “multiple examples” of treatment recommendations that were wrong or unsafe.
  Pages: 1 - 2 >>

Business Affairs Homepage


You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment