Clean Sweep Live Auction on Thur. March 28th. Click to view the full inventory

DOTmed Home MRI Oncology Ultrasound Molecular Imaging X-Ray Cardiology Health IT Business Affairs
News Home Parts & Service Operating Room CT Women's Health Proton Therapy Endoscopy HTMs Mobile Imaging
Current Location:
> This Story

Log in or Register to rate this News Story
Forward Printable StoryPrint Comment



Business Affairs Homepage

Change Healthcare files for IPO Could raise as much as $100 million, listing on Nasdaq

Mergers do nothing for quality of care, lower patient satisfaction, says study Based on 29 data points and the assessment of 16 processes of care

GE Healthcare IPO on hold as new deal takes spotlight Selling biopharma business to Danaher for over $21 billion

Asheville Radiology Association joins Strategic Radiology The latest expansion by the imaging coalition brings 43 new physicians to the table

Johnson & Johnson to acquire Auris Health for $3.4 billion With possible $2.35 billion added if certain milestones are hit

Maybe competition is good for what 'ails' hospitals Mergers may be good for business, but what about patients?

Frost & Sullivan outline 10 growth factors for precision imaging market Market predicted to be more than $8 billion by 2027

RadNet buys Kern Radiology The Bakersfield, California imaging group includes four offices

More of GE healthcare unit could be on block: CEO CEO Culp speaks in post-earnings call after company exceeds Q4 expectations

Philips, Lunit, Vuno in healthcare AI deal Forging partnerships to advance AI applications

Despite added AI costs, there are likely benefits for radiologists

by John W. Mitchell , Senior Correspondent
A just-published paper delves into the uncertainties of how AI overhead costs will change imaging medical economics, but there may be a silver lining — especially for radiologists in private practice who rely on the professional payment component.

“When we look at it (AI), we don’t necessarily look at if we can get more done faster. If I can get my same volume of work done instead of in a ten-hour day, in a nine-hour day, that gives me another hour I can work with patients, the hospitals, and administrators to further patient care and actually achieve better outcomes," Dr. Kurt Schoppe, the author and chair of the Reimbursement Committee of the American College of Radiology Economics Commission told HCB News.

Story Continues Below Advertisement

RaySafe helps you avoid unnecessary radiation

RaySafe solutions are designed to minimize the need for user interaction, bringing unprecedented simplicity & usability to the X-ray room. We're committed to establishing a radiation safety culture wherever technicians & medical staff encounter radiation.

Schoppe, who is also a practicing radiologist in a large North Texas private practice, just published his paper, “Artificial Intelligence: Who Pays and How”, in the recent issue of the Journal of the American College of Radiology.

To be sure, there are real challenges around how the incremental costs of AI development will impact the imaging specialty, AI vendors, and payers. While AI costs – and even efficiencies – are likely to be disruptive, the rise of AI in radiology is inevitable, according to Schoppe.

As reported numerous times recently by HCB News, big data, machine AI learning has already demonstrated it can often read images more efficiently than humans. But for radiologists, this means they will get more time – and enjoyment, according to Shoppe – back in their practice. This is because radiologists will be relieved of many repetitive and mundane reading tasks.

However, one of the big questions he asks is: how will such efficiencies be reflected in payment policies to radiologists?

“For artificial intelligence, there may not be a physician work component, so the RUC and Medicare likely won't acknowledge the technical component of the reimbursement," Schoppe explained. “This is why vendors need to understand the nuance here, because it affects how they calculate potential returns on investment.”

It could be that AI development costs cannot be recouped; it might just be a cost of doing business in the future. But the trade-off may come in lower malpractice costs, lower dose, and improved quality metrics, Schoppe said. Another issue is how will AI costs and efficiencies fit into the drive toward value-based healthcare delivery and payments? Such questions need to be parsed out ahead of time, Schoppe maintained.

“AI is different in a lot of ways,” he said. “We’re adding a new cost into the system that must be accounted for. I’m a militant pragmatist – we have to wade through the hype (of AI).”

Business Affairs Homepage

You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment

Increase Your
Brand Awareness
Auctions + Private Sales
Get The
Best Price
Buy Equipment/Parts
Find The
Lowest Price
Daily News
Read The
Latest News
Browse All
DOTmed Users
Ethics on DOTmed
View Our
Ethics Program
Gold Parts Vendor Program
Receive PH
Gold Service Dealer Program
Receive RFP/PS
Healthcare Providers
See all
HCP Tools
A Job
Parts Hunter +EasyPay
Get Parts
Recently Certified
View Recently
Certified Users
Recently Rated
View Recently
Certified Users
Rental Central
Rent Equipment
For Less
Sell Equipment/Parts
Get The
Most Money
Service Technicians Forum
Find Help
And Advice
Simple RFP
Get Equipment
Virtual Trade Show
Find Service
For Equipment
Access and use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions of our LEGAL NOTICE & PRIVACY NOTICE
Property of and Proprietary to DOTmed.com, Inc. Copyright ©2001-2019 DOTmed.com, Inc.